bubba9497 Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 I have been reading a great deal of Dallas and National media... as well as watching several "experts" on tv discuss the importance of Romo sits to pee's return.... I never knew one player controlled the ability of so many others.. 1. He will make TO great again, by getting him open downfield 2. Roy Williams II... see #1 3. MBII, he's gonna open up lanes for MBII, allowing to have huge games rushing 4. OL, he's supposed to help their blocking by not taking sacks 5. DL, he's somehow gonna to improve the run defense by staying on the field longer and scoring so much teams have to abandon the run 6. Secondary, teams having to pass equals more Ints 7. Coaches, he will save Wade's job, and helped Garrett discover new "things" in the offense they never saw before Also even though his finger has not completely healed and he will wear a split.... it will not hinder his passing, nor be a problem for the entire game... even though it is mid- November in DC at night, and he hasn't used his hand in game conditions, or for as long as a game lasts like he will for the first time since he broke it over a moth ago. Amazing Of course Portis being hurt is supposed to stop the Skins run game, prevent Campbell from passing, and hurt the defense so much they won't be able to stop the run or pass.... or maybe that was because of Romo sits to pee Also, I've learned if Dallas wins (2/3 of the experts picked them to) their playoff chances are strong at 6-4, but if the Redskins lose and are 6-4 and split the series with the pokes.... their playoffs chances are all but over. Again, ......Simply Amazing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighOnHendrix Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 Also, I've learned if Dallas wins (2/3 of the experts picked them to) their playoff chances are strong at 6-4, but if the Redskins lose and are 6-4 and split the series with the pokes.... their playoffs chances are all but over.Again, ......Simply Amazing It's also pretty ridiculous that Vegas has pegged us as underdogs - in our own house - against a team that we solidly beat earlier this year. And that was with Romo sits to pee. It's the same ol' thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 There are a ****load of members in the media who are praying for Dallas to get back into the playoff hunt and deliver on the expectations they all seemed to have for the Cowboys...and their short-lived infatuation with the Skins is pretty much over after seeing them get their asses handed to them by the Steelers. It's almost as if those "2/3rds" of the media said "Yep, the Skins are as medicore as I predicted they would be back in August, and Dallas will show that they're every bit as good as I predicted them to be back in August as well. Just you wait."... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HapHaszard Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 It's almost as if those "2/3rds" of the media said "Yep, the Skins are as medicore as I predicted they would be back in August, and Dallas will show that they're every bit as good as I predicted them to be back in August as well. Just you wait."... But..... But..... they are Pundunce's and we are not, we are just the rabble that buy their periodicals, read their wise articles, and hang on to their every word. My god man get a grip, remember who you are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tr1 Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 The Romo sits to pee hype has returned. Only a few short weeks ago, all pukeville was down on him for his turnovers. Now, pinkie-boy will lead the charge... Hey, this is great. The more pressure on the pukes, the more likely they fold like a cheap suit. Nothing will be better than putting an end to the pukes' season at FedEX. Be afraid, puke fans. Be afraid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoony Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 Most of it is well deserved. Romo sits to pee is that good. Yes, he will make TO and RW a downfield threat again. Johnson? Not so much. Yes, he is able to feel pressure, and shift/move within the pocket and make plays with his feet. Johnson? No. Yes, he will force opposing teams safeties to respect the deep stuff, and not crowd the line of scrimmage to plug running lanes. I'm not sure why it would kill the two of you to admit that he is one of the elite QB's in the game. Sure the Cowboys aren't without flaw, but this is a 5-11 team with Brad Johnson or Brooks Bollinger. With Romo sits to pee, it's a 10-6 team. Does that make you less of a fan to admit it or something? :whoknows: I just have a hard time believing that anyone who has ever watched him play could say he's not good? *******? Yes. ****head? Yes. Little *****? Absolutely. But "not good"? Preposterous. I know one thing- if there was one player in the entire NFC East I could make go away it would be Tony Romo sits to pee. And it wouldn't even be a close decision. ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oldfan Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 I know one thing- if there was one player in the entire NFC East I could make go away it would be Tony Romo sits to pee. And it wouldn't even be a close decision.... Yeah, but why should we listen to you? Your record of picking hotshot QBs includes Brunell with the Skins... and you predicted Michael Vick would make Atlanta a perennial winner, didn't you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeMarco Murray 29 Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 It's Dallas. You know we are like the Yankees, Notre Dame etc. They want any reason to see us win. Simple as that. Romo sits to pee provides hope ... we find out tomorrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeMarco Murray 29 Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 Also, I've learned if Dallas wins (2/3 of the experts picked them to) their playoff chances are strong at 6-4, but if the Redskins lose and are 6-4 and split the series with the pokes.... their playoffs chances are all but over. You know they have been writing the Cowboys playoff chances off since St.Louis. I agree. We would be 6-4 in the thick of it. We have not been out of the race at all this year. The media is wrong for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tr1 Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 I just have a hard time believing that anyone who has ever watched him play could say he's not good? Never said he wasn't good. He's just an average NFL qb (which, by definition means you're good.) But, Parcells saw what a lot of us see in this guy...he's careless with the ball. And in the NFL that's what gets coaches fired. And, frankly, his o-line is as responsible for his numbers as he is. You may notice that the o-line isn't playing well this year...and neither is Romo sits to pee. He's not Brady...he's Danny White. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scyber Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 It's also pretty ridiculous that Vegas has pegged us as underdogs - in our own house - against a team that we solidly beat earlier this year. And that was with Romo sits to pee. It's the same ol' thing. Remember that vegas lines do not reflect who the "experts" think is the better team. Rather they are designed to get 50% of the betters to bet on each side of the line. Basically the vegas line is a measure of what the public thinks of the teams, not what experts do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 Most of it is well deserved. Romo sits to pee is that good.Yes, he will make TO and RW a downfield threat again. Johnson? Not so much. Yes, he is able to feel pressure, and shift/move within the pocket and make plays with his feet. Johnson? No. Yes, he will force opposing teams safeties to respect the deep stuff, and not crowd the line of scrimmage to plug running lanes. I'm not sure why it would kill the two of you to admit that he is one of the elite QB's in the game. Sure the Cowboys aren't without flaw, but this is a 5-11 team with Brad Johnson or Brooks Bollinger. With Romo sits to pee, it's a 10-6 team. Does that make you less of a fan to admit it or something? :whoknows: I just have a hard time believing that anyone who has ever watched him play could say he's not good? *******? Yes. ****head? Yes. Little *****? Absolutely. But "not good"? Preposterous. I know one thing- if there was one player in the entire NFC East I could make go away it would be Tony Romo sits to pee. And it wouldn't even be a close decision. ... Um, had anyone said Romo sits to pee was "not good" on the thread? Because if not, I'm not sure who or what you're arguing against lol... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted November 15, 2008 Author Share Posted November 15, 2008 I'm not sure why it would kill the two of you to admit that he is one of the elite QB's in the game. Sure the Cowboys aren't without flaw, but this is a 5-11 team with Brad Johnson or Brooks Bollinger. With Romo sits to pee, it's a 10-6 team. Does that make you less of a fan to admit it or something? :whoknows: I just have a hard time believing that anyone who has ever watched him play could say he's not good? *******? Yes. ****head? Yes. Little *****? Absolutely. But "not good"? Preposterous. ... where have I ever said he wasn't "good"? (However I do say he isn't the end all to be all at QB, you and others think). besides you completely MISSED the point.... this isn't about basing Romo sits to pee, this is about the absurd notion Romo sits to pee cures all, that the others aren't responsible for there failures, that the media keeps harping about. he's not going to get TO open... he can get him the ball deeper and faster than BJ, but TO still has to beat Springs/Rogers on his own. Romo sits to pee hasn't helped Barber get yards against the Skins before.... why now? His ability to avoid a rush equals fewer sacks, but that's not because the OL is blocking better.... he got hurt because he was getting pummeled by the Cards DL. and no matter how you want to spin it, he's not gonna fix a poor defense.... no matter what the offense does.... he isn't going to make a tackle, or help get the defense off the field one snap sooner can the Pokes win Sunday... yes Do their chances improve with Romo sits to pee back... yes, greatly Does he cure all of the pokes problems? uh NO.... they were there before he got hurt, after he got hurt, and will still be there upon his return Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoony Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 Fine- we'll argue semantics then. How anyone can say he's not one of the leagues most dangerous QB's is beyond me. And Oldfan- funny stuff coming from a Pat Ramsey ball-washer. ..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oldfan Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 How anyone can say he's not one of the leagues most dangerous QB's is beyond me.. But he's dangerous to both sides. That's what others are trying to tell you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigMike619 Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 Fine- we'll argue semantics then.How anyone can say he's not one of the leagues most dangerous QB's is beyond me. And Oldfan- funny stuff coming from a Pat Ramsey ball-washer. ..... I will say that he is a good QB. But he is dangerous to his own team as well. INTs, fumbles, etc. He has a knack for letting teams back in to big games just as much as he does making great plays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted November 15, 2008 Author Share Posted November 15, 2008 Fine- we'll argue semantics then. How anyone can say he's not one of the leagues most dangerous QB's is beyond me ..... that's for another thread..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger.Staubach Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 and no matter how you want to spin it, he's not gonna fix a poor defense.... no matter what the offense does.... he isn't going to make a tackle, or help get the defense off the field one snap sooner I absolutely disagree with this statement. I think that our defense has played REALLY well the last few weeks. Since Romo sits to pee has been out, our offenses inability to maintain any type of ball control has severely impacted the play of our defense. Our players have been getting tired early in the third quarter. Romo sits to pee gives us the opportunity to convert third downs and rest the defense. Brad Johnson gave us....well...nothing. for the record, I do agree with the theme of the original post. There are a lot of problem with the Cowboys right now and I don't think that Romo sits to pee can/will fix them. As a team, we lack professionalism and strong mental character. On a side note, I think that the Felix injury hurts us almost as much as the Romo sits to pee injury. He's been HUGE for us. Barber isn't an every down back and the injury to Felix has definitely been felt... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigMike619 Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 I cant lie Roger, when I saw that Felix was out I got a little bit excited. not for the injury because I never wish ill upon a man, but because I know he is dangerous and helps bring the RB game closer to an even plane again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TSO Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 ............. I know one thing- if there was one player in the entire NFC East I could make go away it would be Tony Romo sits to pee. And it wouldn't even be a close decision. ... I would have to go with Brian Westbrook. If it's one player, he's the guy who causes the most damage alone. Tony Romo sits to pee? Nah. He's good, arguably very good... but he's not the single most dangerous weapon in our division. The Cowboys got so many weapons surrounding him, and if those were taken away, he'd be extemely average. Donovan Mcnabb plays better with average talent around him than Romo sits to pee. What does Romo sits to pee do when TO is out? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 Fine- we'll argue semantics then.How anyone can say he's not one of the leagues most dangerous QB's is beyond me. And Oldfan- funny stuff coming from a Pat Ramsey ball-washer. ..... bubba's point, though, was that Romo sits to pee is nowhere near good enough to solve the Cowboys' ills...**** that, NO QB is that good. And especially not a QB who chokes in big games and turns the ball over as much as Romo sits to pee does. Is it THAT important in your mind that Romo sits to pee be acknowledged as one of the league's "most dangerous QBs" that you'd rather argue that than the actual topic of the thread? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 I cant lie Roger, when I saw that Felix was out I got a little bit excited. not for the injury because I never wish ill upon a man, but because I know he is dangerous and helps bring the RB game closer to an even plane again. Yeah, I was ever-so-slightly happy to hear Felix wouldn't be playing Sunday as well lol... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bacon Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 What does Romo sits to pee do when TO is out? 7/16 86 yards 0 TDs 1 INT -December 30, 2007 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeHateMe Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 It's also pretty ridiculous that Vegas has pegged us as underdogs - in our own house - against a team that we solidly beat earlier this year. And that was with Romo sits to pee. It's the same ol' thing. Vegas may have set the initial line, but the public didn't change it. Although I can see it closing at or near a pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoony Posted November 16, 2008 Share Posted November 16, 2008 Most of it is well deserved. Romo sits to pee is that good.Yes, he will make TO and RW a downfield threat again. Johnson? Not so much. Yes, he is able to feel pressure, and shift/move within the pocket and make plays with his feet. Johnson? No. Yes, he will force opposing teams safeties to respect the deep stuff, and not crowd the line of scrimmage to plug running lanes. I'm not sure why it would kill the two of you to admit that he is one of the elite QB's in the game. Sure the Cowboys aren't without flaw, but this is a 5-11 team with Brad Johnson or Brooks Bollinger. With Romo sits to pee, it's a 10-6 team. Does that make you less of a fan to admit it or something? :whoknows: I just have a hard time believing that anyone who has ever watched him play could say he's not good? *******? Yes. ****head? Yes. Little *****? Absolutely. But "not good"? Preposterous. I know one thing- if there was one player in the entire NFC East I could make go away it would be Tony Romo sits to pee. And it wouldn't even be a close decision. ... And Bubba, I addressed your OP Yes, he forces the safeties back. (helps run game) Yes, he is ellusive in the pocket and can extend plays (helps pass protection) Yes, TO and RW are 5x the threat with Romo sits to pee behind center than they are with Bollinger or Johnson. Didn't I already type that? lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.