Skinfan56 Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 just saw on NFL network calais campbell ran a 5.03...this might ensure he's there when we pick, but its also somewhat alarming to me...that's pretty slow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaught76 Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 I am liking the idea of Phillip Merling more and more at the 21st pick instead of Campbell, if he is there. I think I would take DT Balmer before Campbell with our pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nightbird Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 I doubt it will be an issue. How often during a game does a 280-pound DE take his pads off and run full speed ahead unimpeded for 40 yards? Where's the combine drill for "beating the tackle in front of you and obliterating the qb"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Grim_Reaper Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 I doubt it will be an issue.How often during a game does a 280-pound DE take his pads off and run full speed ahead unimpeded for 40 yards? Where's the combine drill for "beating the tackle in front of you and obliterating the qb"? EXACTLY:applause: . However his technique has also been questioned as well as his work ethic. I say go for Merling, Harvey or Groves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Lloyd Christmas Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 40 times for lineman are pretty stupid if you ask me. and nightbird is correct, when was the last time you saw a 280 pound lineman bolting around? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jnhay Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 5.03 sounds fast to me. I didn't see the other DE times though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Grim_Reaper Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 5.03 sounds fast to me. I didn't see the other DE times though. It isn't. Some DTs run faster than that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SittingBull Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 Can he do a backflip? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WVUforREDSKINS Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 It isn't. Some DTs run faster than that. Like who? I just wonder what Gilbert Brown ran. He had to be at least 8 seconds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CG Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 I haven't really been sold on this guy yet. He's a monster at what 6'8" ? but he didn't put up very impressive numbers in his college career. 13 Sacks in 26 games is decent but is that really that great? I dont know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaught76 Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 I doubt it will be an issue.How often during a game does a 280-pound DE take his pads off and run full speed ahead unimpeded for 40 yards? Where's the combine drill for "beating the tackle in front of you and obliterating the qb"? I agree with your comment, but there have been reports or posts that Campbell has poor technique and allows blockers to get under him and get to his legs a lot. Thus, if there was a "beating the tackle in front of you and oblirating the QB" drill, which I would love too see, Campbell would not have good results. As long as we draft the best football player to play DE, not the best athlete I will be happy. If Campbell is the best football player for us at 21, then so be it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiveStrongSkins Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 His first 10 yard increment split is the most important part. The QB is usually 7-8 yards away, its the initial burst that matters. Who cares he ran a 5.0. Maybe he was out of shape and slowed down after 30 yards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skeenzfan Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 40 times are overrated...most of the so called burners end up being average in the NFL. You NEVER run 40 yards in a straight line in your shorts without the fear of getting hit on Sundays. NEVER. Football speeds shows up on game film only. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jnhay Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 It isn't. Some DTs run faster than that. Meh. The distance to the QB is way less than 40 yards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Higgs44 Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 very disappointing... im officially off the bandwagon :laugh: Coincidentally, i found my new DE to snag...Jason Jones E.Mich 6'5" 275...ran a 4.77 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Portis4MVP2628 Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 I am beginning to think our 1st round pick will be a DT like balmer or WR like sweed, i really dont see us taking a DE with all of whats being said by zorn and cerrato they seem to like wilson and washington, and for some reason daniels too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Grim_Reaper Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 Like who? I just wonder what Gilbert Brown ran. He had to be at least 8 seconds. Dre Moore ran 4.88 and Laws ran 5.00 I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Never4get#21 Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 5.03 sounds fast to me. I didn't see the other DE times though. Are you kidding? the Tackles ran faster than that ...and he doesnt look to agile... . We need to stop looking at this kid and move on ......... Look at others like Harvey or Merling.... Watching also.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kiingspadee Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 I think for linemen they should have a different type of 40. more like how quick you can shed 10 blocks or something like that i dunno but a 40 is just overrated for linemen. they arent known for their speed yet their quickness and ability to get to the QB JIMHO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WVUforREDSKINS Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 Dre Moore ran 4.88 and Laws ran 5.00 I think. Well, I won't make a big deal out of a .03 sec difference. 4.88 is nice though. I agree 40 yd dash for lineman is retarted. I just want a phsyical guy with a quick burst off the ball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfbovey Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 very disappointing... im officially off the bandwagon :laugh: Coincidentally, i found my new DE to snag...Jason Jones E.Mich 6'5" 275...ran a 4.77 Yeah, but can he play football? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jnhay Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 Are you kidding? the Tackles ran faster than that ...and he doesnt look to agile... . We need to stop looking at this kid and move on ......... Look at others like Harvey or Merling.... Watching also.... So you think it's wise to base everything off the combine? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovetoaster Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 Dre Moore ran 4.88 and Laws ran 5.00 I think. Chris Long ran a 4.71 EDIT: Sorry, I forgot that the original question was about DT's running faster times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbnva Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 for perspective Andre Carter's 40 time was 4.84 that is .19 seconds faster than campbell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCchillin89 Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 You can't look too much into a DE's forty time. However, it would have really boosted his stock if he ran a fast one. This guy seems to have way too many flaws. He's really lanky, and blockers can always seem to get under him. He is a project, and with so much talent at 21, I could see us go with Merling or Groves or Harvey instead of campbell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.