steveo21 Posted November 7, 2007 Share Posted November 7, 2007 Jehovah's Witness mother dies after refusing blood November 5, 2007 A 22-year-old woman died within a few hours of giving birth to twins because, as a Jehovah's Witness, she was not allowed to accept a blood transfusion, it emerged today. Emma Gough suffered severe blood loss after giving birth to a boy and girl at the Royal Hospital in Shrewsbury ten days ago. Doctors and medics begged her 24-year-old husband, Anthony, and other relatives to overrule a form she had ticked insisting that she should not be given blood because of her faith. But the family refused to do so. Peter Welsh, the best man at the couple's wedding on a beach in Barbados two years ago, told The Sun newspaper: "Everyone is devastated by what has happened. We can't believe that she died after childbirth in this day and age, with all the technology there is. "What makes it even more sad is Emma had time to hold and start to bond with her twins before the complications set in." Terry Lovejoy, spokesman for Jehovah's Witnesses in Telford, said today that the local religious community had rallied round the bereaved family. He said: "We are supporting the family - they are going through a very difficult time and we understand their grief." A spokesman for the faith's central office in London said: "You don't find many Jehovah's Witnesses taking blood. If someone did they would be saying I don't really believe in the basic tenets of the faith." The biblical injunction against blood transfusions was comparable to the injunctions against adultery, he said. "You can't pick and choose," he said. Tom Taylor, Chief Executive of The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust said today: "We have offered our deepest condolences to the family, and our thoughts are with them at this difficult time." A spokeswoman from the British Medical Association told The Times: "It's a tragic case but its cut and dried from where we are standing. The doctors' hands are tried. Competent adults have the right to refuse any medical treatment even if that refusal results in permanent physical injury or death. I am sure the doctors will have done all they can do to try to persuade this woman or her family to allow the blood transfusion but you can't force someone to. To do so would be against the Human Rights Act." An inquest into the death has been opened and adjourned, according to the coroner's department in Shrewsbury. Jehovah's Witnesses, who espouse an early version of Christianity, are automatically declared outcasts from their faith if they take blood into the body, whether through the mouth or veins. They cite verses from the Old and New Testaments of the Bible to support their position, including Genesis 9 vs 3-4: "Every moving animal that is alive may serve as food for you. As in the case of green vegetation, I do give it all to you. Only flesh with its soul--its blood--you must not eat." Acts 15:28-29 says: "For the holy spirit and we ourselves have favoured adding no further burden to you, except these necessary things, to keep abstaining from things sacrificed to idols and from blood and from things strangled and from fornication. If you carefully keep yourselves from these things, you will prosper. Good health to you!" Transfusions of red blood cells, white blood cells, platelets and plasma are forbidden. In 2004 The Watchtower Society, the official body representing Jehovah's Witnesses, did however notify its members that fractions from each of these, including red blood cells without a membrane, can be used in medical procedures according to a Witness's own conscience. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article2809423.ece Poor kids. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 While I disagree with her choice I am glad that we still have the power of choice in such matters....We all have the right to be wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edgun88 Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 That is just sad. And ridiculous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ldysknzfn1 Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 Very sad indeed. But it's refreshing to see someone stand by their beliefs to that extent. Not sure I could do the same..Life is a precious gift. Jehovah Witnessess do hold their beliefs very near and dear. But I thought they had changed this particular no-no. Guess not. I thought they could accept blood products..like plasma and such... just not real blood.....maybe that doesn't do the same as whole blood tho. Not real sure about that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdamB Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 Very sad indeed. But it's refreshing to see someone stand by their beliefs to that extent. Not sure I could do the same..Life is a precious gift. Jehovah Witnessess do hold their beliefs very near and dear. But I thought they had changed this particular no-no. Guess not. I thought they could accept blood products..like plasma and such... just not real blood.....maybe that doesn't do the same as whole blood tho. Not real sure about that. They can accept some blood products, as well as bloodless procedures which have proven successful during surgery such as kidney transplants and are becoming more common in Europe. Which products they use is left up to the individual Witness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riggo-toni Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 While I disagree with her choice I am glad that we still have the power of choice in such matters....We all have the right to be wrong. Ditto. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xameil Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 While I disagree with her choice I am glad that we still have the power of choice in such matters....We all have the right to be wrong. yup and she'll never be wrong again... :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coooleeey Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 She is a fool. I don't feel like going on a rant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pjfootballer Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 I hope she'll have a good explaination when she meets Jahova, and he asks her why she let herself die instead of handing out leaflets door to door. She cut into his bidness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corcaigh Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 Her irrational belief caused her own death and terrible loss for her family. I don't see anything admirable in it at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chomerics Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 Dear husband, I died because I am a moron :doh: Hey, at least we have yet another Darwin award candidate :thumbsup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.