EnFoRcEr_uPu Posted September 4, 2007 Share Posted September 4, 2007 http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/powerRankings 23 Redskins "One team’s problem is another team’s solution. Though the Jets didn’t want to give 34-year-old Pete Kendall a new contract, Washington was more than happy to grant the 11-year veteran a $1 million raise. Kendall comes to Washington all smiles, where he’ll start immediately at the left guard position. Jason Campbell will suffer through growing pains, while the revamped defense will continue to learn on the fly." To see a team like the Bills ranked above the Skins' is laughable IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mackdaddydean Posted September 4, 2007 Share Posted September 4, 2007 I surprised you still don't realize that most analysts are still just looking at this number: 5-11. They care about nothing else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sec325 Posted September 4, 2007 Share Posted September 4, 2007 wow that list was horrible!! all he did was look at last years record and made a list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RenegadeTK Posted September 4, 2007 Share Posted September 4, 2007 weren't we 17 like 2 weeks ago???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soup Posted September 4, 2007 Share Posted September 4, 2007 well at least he has Miami at 29 where they belong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
d0ublestr0ker0ll Posted September 4, 2007 Share Posted September 4, 2007 I love it. We were around #3 last year, peeps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Touchdown Redskins Posted September 4, 2007 Share Posted September 4, 2007 Good, I hope they drop us to #32 so we have a fire lit under us and go out there and make everyone a believer. These lists are garbage anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Live4Skins Posted September 4, 2007 Share Posted September 4, 2007 Check these rankings out; http://cbs.sportsline.com/nfl/powerrankings :logo: 22. I like what I saw from Jason Campbell when he played in the preseason. If he develops into a quality passer this season, this might seem low in a month. HTTR!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
One Shot Posted September 4, 2007 Share Posted September 4, 2007 Check these rankings out; http://cbs.sportsline.com/nfl/powerrankings:logo: 22. I like what I saw from Jason Campbell when he played in the preseason. If he develops into a quality passer this season, this might seem low in a month. HTTR!!! No arguments there. It's all on Campbell now. I think people are too quick to assume that Campbell is set, that he is an elite QB now. Just keep in mind, guys, he still has to prove himself. I think he will, but it's not a certainty. I'm just as optimistic as you are, but I'm still keeping in mind that there COULD be some growing pains. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinklein Posted September 4, 2007 Share Posted September 4, 2007 I surprised you still don't realize that most analysts are still just looking at this number: 5-11. They care about nothing else. Bingo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aston Posted September 4, 2007 Share Posted September 4, 2007 Check these rankings out; http://cbs.sportsline.com/nfl/powerrankings:logo: 22. I like what I saw from Jason Campbell when he played in the preseason. If he develops into a quality passer this season, this might seem low in a month. HTTR!!! Dallas = 4?? :laugh: Ok.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCranon21 Posted September 4, 2007 Share Posted September 4, 2007 In order to get respect, we need to erase that 5-11 from last year. All we have to do is show and prove. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Live4Skins Posted September 4, 2007 Share Posted September 4, 2007 Dallas = 4?? :laugh: Ok.... Prisco see's something there in Dallas with Romo sits to pee-ahem-Homo that makes him tingle in special places. PRISCO TELL Romo sits to pee TO STOP LICKING YOUR BUTTHOLE!! HTTR!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
“Misdirection” Posted September 4, 2007 Share Posted September 4, 2007 wow, i love how we're so under-rated in everyones opinion I hope they all get fired when we make the paloffs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
28skinsfan Posted September 4, 2007 Share Posted September 4, 2007 The CBS list is more laughable then the FOX one. Dallas ranked four spots above NO. Absolute insanity. HTTR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hands11 Posted September 5, 2007 Share Posted September 5, 2007 http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/7174442?MSNHPHCP>1=10473 Adam Schein Who is this geek? Another reason I hate Fox anything. What a joke network. Has us last in the Division. You have new coach in Dallas. Lets not forget how hard this is to over come. NY lost Tiki who was only most of their offense. Phili can be a solid team. They have a great QB and an establish coach, system etc. As for Washington. Sure, every year things look good in preseason but objectively, I like this team better then any other team since Gibbs has returned. I think we did real well to address our needs. 2nd year of Saunder - so they have had some time to get on the same page. Williams is retooled at DB and LB. Adding Smoot was brilliant. LL is a beast. We are stacked at DB. Adding LFletcher is even more brilliant. He is instantly the leader of that defense. You also have 2 vets at CB and Griff as your vet leader of the line. We also got younger there. We proved Betts can get it done even if Clinton doesn't play, but CP did what he needed to get healthy... and they wont over work him this year. I think he wants to prove that resting him in the off-season was the right move. And I'm not worried about Campbell at all. He got nothing but great reviews, even from Williams. He looks totally mature and comfortable in his interview and he looks great on the field. We also finally seem to have a FG kicker. Also we moved L to 2nd WR were I think he will do well. Loyd will have to get it done from the 3rd position. Special teams are looking good. The only real question I see are: The left side of the OL has to gel while playing but they are both excellent Vets.. they will get it done. Moss has to stay healthy for us to have good production at WR. Moss is the key and my biggest worry. We are much better for a lot of reason but the biggest to me is ... No Brunell starting at QB and being in the 2nd year of Saunders and Gibbs. We will make the playoffs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BleedBNG Posted September 5, 2007 Share Posted September 5, 2007 Peter Schrager This video game is eerily good at predicting things http://msn.foxsports.com/cfb/story/7159172 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andre The Giant Posted September 5, 2007 Share Posted September 5, 2007 Last year was too disappointing for me to get worked up over where we are on lists right now. It's understandable why prognosticators in general have us ranked low. We stunk up the joint last year. Have we looked better in preseason? Unquestionably. But we've also all had our hopes crushed by this franchise a lot in the past fifteen seasons. A lot of these prognosticators have been slammed for picking us to do well in those years too. Why would they stick their neck out for a team that chronically underachieves? If we play well and start beating quality opponents, we'll start receiving respect. Until then, we have to prove it on the field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PapaDRoc Posted September 5, 2007 Share Posted September 5, 2007 Coming off a 5-11 season, I'm not surprised the Skins have to prove themselves this year. The Skins are opening the season with hardly any respect from the media, which is fine with me and I'm sure is fine with the Redskins Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D-Day Posted September 5, 2007 Share Posted September 5, 2007 Good, I hope they drop us to #32 so we have a fire lit under us and go out there and make everyone a believer. These lists are garbage anyway. Why do people believe these rankings have any bearing on how this team will play? I would be surprised if any of the people in the business takes these things at all seriously. They know the writers are just throwing darts on these "rankings". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bedlamVR Posted September 5, 2007 Share Posted September 5, 2007 22 is fair for me . How Campbell does is key and we will have to ait to see if adding speed to the deence was the key to its sucess. No 4 for the cowboys is crazy ... you have a whole new coaching tree, the best CB is hobbled, the QB coach is susspended and the OC is a rookie... There are much better teams in the NFC.... Football is all about continuity the teams with the least turbulance does the best the Eagles have changed the least in the NFCE this year they are the team to beat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loxley Posted September 5, 2007 Share Posted September 5, 2007 We should've been ranked higher than the ******* Giants! Thats the one thing I cant get over about the whole article. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[[ghost]] Posted September 5, 2007 Share Posted September 5, 2007 I'm VERY glad they ranked us this low. I don't want them buying into any hype- we can surprise them like everyone else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thirtyfive2seven Posted September 5, 2007 Share Posted September 5, 2007 I thought the skins were 19 the last time these stupid things came out. I really don't care where they rank us honestly just as long as the skins win games this year. Which they will. This is the same media that reports to you the news on the war in Iraq - think about it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsfan51 Posted September 5, 2007 Share Posted September 5, 2007 I surprised you still don't realize that most analysts are still just looking at this number: 5-11. They care about nothing else. Until we do something to improve that number, I don't think they should, do you? I mean, that number is the bottom line. Let's get it reversed this season!! :point2sky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.