NVskinsfan Posted February 21, 2007 Share Posted February 21, 2007 I know the Skins' name comes up with every FA and trading picks for a player, but do we trade a player or two to get a couple of extra picks? Are there any players other team are interested in? Go Skins!!! :helmet: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freeseantaylor2k6 Posted February 21, 2007 Share Posted February 21, 2007 The problem is that the players we could getting rid of (Arch, B. Loyd, Springs) don't have contracts which most teams would want to take. At most other positions we don't have the kind of depth to be trading quality players and letting younger, more inexperienced guys take their place. I would never put it past them though to prove me wrong... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redskins53 Posted February 21, 2007 Share Posted February 21, 2007 The only trade I can see happening would be Betts and the 6th pick for Vilma, Jets 1st round and a 2nd round. I don't think we have any one else that other teams would want to trade for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bryceb07 Posted February 21, 2007 Share Posted February 21, 2007 Maybe David Patten for another 3rd or 4th Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the burgundy and gold Posted February 21, 2007 Share Posted February 21, 2007 Maybe David Patten for another 3rd or 4th or anything that anyone is willing to give us... 7th round is acceptable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IWANTOBEGM Posted February 21, 2007 Share Posted February 21, 2007 trading a 3rd or 4th for Patten wouldn't happen. Teams a are savy enough to know that a player not getting to player who is getting paid will ultimately get released or asked to be released. Patten has zero trade value. Someone already said it, due to the contracts we've signed no dice...only way anything would work would be a sign (restructure) and trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOSKN5 Posted February 21, 2007 Share Posted February 21, 2007 I think like said above the contracts we give players are astronomical and other teams dont want to take them on.... also the players we want to get rid of all have major questions marks ( lloyd-attitude??, AA- anything left??, Springs- stay healthy??) this makes their contracts way to high with too many questions.... maybe we can just start packaging up our players and trade them all together for something.... we could probably get a 2nd or 3rd for all the players above??? well maybe a 3rd 4th.... haha....although I am for keeping springs.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLongshot Posted February 21, 2007 Share Posted February 21, 2007 The only reason to trade a player is if a team blows us away with a trade offer, we have a player we know we can't keep, or we have a player we don't want.. I doubt we will get much of the former, and we don't have any of the latter. We did trade away Coles, Gardner and Ramsey, but by the time we traded them, they didn't have much value. For most of the players we have, they have more value to us than other teams would be willing to give us for them. Jason Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pjfootballer Posted February 21, 2007 Share Posted February 21, 2007 I say get what we can for them, even if we have 10 7th round picks. Picks are picks. Tom Brady was taken in the 6th round. Marques Colston was taken in the 7th. Our own Kedric Golsten was taken in the 6th (or 7th- can't remember). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InTikiITrust Posted February 21, 2007 Share Posted February 21, 2007 The only trade I can see happening would be Betts and the 6th pick for Vilma, Jets 1st round and a 2nd round. I don't think we have any one else that other teams would want to trade for. HAHAHA if that happens. Jets would NEVER do that and you know it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scrimmage Posted February 21, 2007 Share Posted February 21, 2007 The Skins probably have a few players other teams might want ... that the Skins wouldn't be cutting anyway ... and that the Skins might be able to afford to part with ... maybe Mike Sellers or Pierson Prioleau or Troy Vincent. Small potato trades, but b/c all the Skins money is in the starters, the depth doesn't really look real tradeworthy, so its the situational guys who become more attractive. - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THUNDERDOME Posted February 21, 2007 Share Posted February 21, 2007 The Skins probably have a few players other teams might want ... that the Skins wouldn't be cutting anyway ... and that the Skins might be able to afford to part with ... maybe Mike Sellers or Pierson Prioleau or Troy Vincent. Small potato trades, but b/c all the Skins money is in the starters, the depth doesn't really look real tradeworthy, so its the situational guys who become more attractive.- He's not going anywhere. You can't trade for what he leaves out there on the field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scrimmage Posted February 21, 2007 Share Posted February 21, 2007 Maybe Khary Campbell or Demetric Evans, but they seem to be the top quality depth at their respective positions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.