tr1 Posted January 4, 2007 Share Posted January 4, 2007 Very sad. http://www.eog.com/news/full-article.aspx?id=15784 Current Odds: Odds To Win Super Bowl XLI San Diego Chargers 5/2 Baltimore Ravens 9/2 Chicago Bears 5/1 New England Patriots 9/1 New Orleans Saints 10/1 Indianapolis Colts 10/1 Philadelphia Eagles 11/1 Seattle Seahawks 28/1 Dallas Cowboys 34/1 Kansas City Chiefs 50/1 New York Giants 50/1 New York Jets 50/1 Odds To Win AFC Championship San Diego Chargers 5/4 Baltimore Ravens 5/2 New England Patriots 6/1 Indianapolis Colts 6/1 New York Jets 28/1 Kansas City Chiefs 30/1 Odds To Win NFC Championship Chicago Bears 7/4 New Orleans Saints 5/2 Philadelphia Eagles 11/2 Seattle Seahawks 11/1 Dallas Cowboys 12/1 New York Giants 20/1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DWinzit Posted January 4, 2007 Share Posted January 4, 2007 I think you meant "no NFCE team in the top six" If Romo sits to pee was playing near the level he was a few weeks ago, Dallas would have a much higher rating! I could have seen them easily defeat a CB-depleted Seattle and a Rex run Chicago! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flashback Posted January 4, 2007 Share Posted January 4, 2007 Umm, aren't Chicago (#3) and New Orleans (#5) in the NFC? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pocono Posted January 4, 2007 Share Posted January 4, 2007 "No NFC team in the top six".......Last time I checked the Bears and the Saints were both in the NFC tr. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cassow Posted January 4, 2007 Share Posted January 4, 2007 "No NFC team in the top six".......Last time I checked the Bears and the Saints were both in the NFC tr. I'm sure he forgot to insert the "EAST" in there....its his attempt to bash the 3 of the 4 NFC east teams that did make the playoffs. Now thats very sad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DWinzit Posted January 4, 2007 Share Posted January 4, 2007 I'm sure he forgot to insert the "EAST" in there....its his attempt to bash the 3 of the 4 NFC east teams that did make the playoffs. Now thats very sad. Perhaps he is saying it is sad that with all the preseason hype, expectation and league mediocrity, none of the NFCE teams reached the top six! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alabama Man Posted January 4, 2007 Share Posted January 4, 2007 didn't sports illustrated predict the entire nfc east to all go 9-7 because it would be competitive and the best division in the conference? I don't think they were that far off Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted January 4, 2007 Share Posted January 4, 2007 I think you meant "no NFCE team in the top six"If Romo sits to pee was playing near the level he was a few weeks ago, Dallas would have a much higher rating! I could have seen them easily defeat a CB-depleted Seattle and a Rex run Chicago! their pass defense is going to have to show up, or Hassy will have a big day Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DWinzit Posted January 4, 2007 Share Posted January 4, 2007 their pass defense is going to have to show up, or Hassy will have a big day As long as Roy is back their, they are okay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted January 4, 2007 Share Posted January 4, 2007 it's one thing when tr1 stirs the pot (which is okay on a Redsin board), it's another when he doesn't and is still accused.... I would suggest that everyone back off and lets stay on topic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted January 4, 2007 Share Posted January 4, 2007 As long as Roy is back their, they are okay. you mean the Hawks right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tr1 Posted January 4, 2007 Author Share Posted January 4, 2007 Perhaps he is saying it is sad that with all the preseason hype, expectation and league mediocrity, none of the NFCE teams reached the top six! Ding! And yes, NFCE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KLJ Posted January 4, 2007 Share Posted January 4, 2007 not sure they will win it all but i will certainly put $10 on indy.. i think it's a good bet at 10/1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DWinzit Posted January 4, 2007 Share Posted January 4, 2007 not sure they will win it all but i will certainly put $10 on indy.. i think it's a good bet at 10/1 I have a hard time seeing Indy survive in Baltimore or SD. Plus Mannings aren't allowed to get rings! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pocono Posted January 4, 2007 Share Posted January 4, 2007 I'm sure he forgot to insert the "EAST" in there....its his attempt to bash the 3 of the 4 NFC east teams that did make the playoffs. Now thats very sad. Just like in industry when a producer goes into mass production mode quality goes out the window. If tr would just allow each brain cell an extra second to think about what he's posting he could avoid these mistakes and the extra 10 seconds spent would still allow him to post them in a timely manner. The teams that are really getting dissed by these odds are NO and the Seahawks. NO has to play only 2 games to reach the SB but they are behind the Pats in the odds and the Hawks have the same road to the big game as the Pats Colts and Eagles but they are 28-1 while the others are 9-1 10-1 and 11-1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Number5 Posted January 4, 2007 Share Posted January 4, 2007 So where are the Redskins on this list? :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westbrook36 Posted January 4, 2007 Share Posted January 4, 2007 Somehow, this just doesn't bother me. Betting odds have never really given me much to think about, either way. OMG, THE EAGLES ARE SEVEN POINT FAVORITES SO THEY SHOULD WIN THIS WEEKEND!!! I don't pay attn to that ****. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alabama Man Posted January 4, 2007 Share Posted January 4, 2007 Perhaps he is saying it is sad that with all the preseason hype, expectation and league mediocrity, none of the NFCE teams reached the top six! A. They are Vegas standings. Not the Bible. B. New England. Baltimore. Indianapolis. San Diego. Chicago. New Orleans. Saints own the tie breaker over the Eagles keeping them out of the 'top 6' of this list. Need I remind that Sports Illustrated predicting the Eagles to go 9-7 was one of the more optimistic predictions for the Eagles. Some said that the Owens mess was left behind with 2005, but a lot more predicted the rest of the NFC East had caught up with them. That the window had closed. People say that every season about the Eagles. There main point of being contention, that well, odds say that is what has to happen. Not actually what happens on the fields. A team can not remain in a playoffs for such an extended amount of time. Odds say that. Hey, do I see a recurring theme here? Is you saying the NFC East didn't live up to expectations? I think the Eagles exceeded expectations from the summer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DWinzit Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 Need I remind that Sports Illustrated predicting the Eagles to go 9-7 was one of the more optimistic predictions for the Eagles.Some said that the Owens mess was left behind with 2005, but a lot more predicted the rest of the NFC East had caught up with them. That the window had closed. People say that every season about the Eagles. There main point of being contention, that well, odds say that is what has to happen. Not actually what happens on the fields. A team can not remain in a playoffs for such an extended amount of time. Odds say that. Hey, do I see a recurring theme here? Is you saying the NFC East didn't live up to expectations? I think the Eagles exceeded expectations from the summer. The Eagles were predicted to go 9-7 on many boards. The only holes discussed in their lineup were WR and backup QB's. Shortly after that, they landed Stallworth and Feeley. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OWUeagleMD Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 The Eagles were predicted to go 9-7 on many boards. The only holes discussed in their lineup were WR and backup QB's. Shortly after that, they landed Stallworth and Feeley. No one mentioned holes at outside linebacker? What about a "big" runningback? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alabama Man Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 I remember it having less to do with personal and more to do with the fact that their time was up and the window had closed, because their time was up and the window had closed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DWinzit Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 No one mentioned holes at outside linebacker? What about a "big" runningback? Do you mean other than me! :laugh: Westbrook managed to stay healthy, Buckhalter proved me wrong at RB and Gaither stepped up at LB. They still filled the QB and WR void early! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tr1 Posted January 5, 2007 Author Share Posted January 5, 2007 Just like in industry when a producer goes into mass production mode quality goes out the window. If tr would just allow each brain cell an extra second to think about what he's posting he could avoid these mistakes and the extra 10 seconds spent would still allow him to post them in a timely manner.The teams that are really getting dissed by these odds are NO and the Seahawks. NO has to play only 2 games to reach the SB but they are behind the Pats in the odds and the Hawks have the same road to the big game as the Pats Colts and Eagles but they are 28-1 while the others are 9-1 10-1 and 11-1. Once again, a personal attack...and then total spin on the odds. Consistent, Popo... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tr1 Posted January 5, 2007 Author Share Posted January 5, 2007 So where are the Redskins on this list? :laugh: Careful, #4, someone might mistake you for a troll. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 So where are the Redskins on this list? :laugh: the Skins made the playoffs? :thud: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.