CGSKINS Posted November 20, 2006 Share Posted November 20, 2006 We need to evaluate why we went from having hands down the best and most dominant defense in the division to the worst...in the span of one season. Riggo me and you think alike. I'm sitting ther watching the game and shaking my head like" what the **** is going on. It looks like the players on defense have quit on Greg williams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RiggoReincarnated Posted November 20, 2006 Share Posted November 20, 2006 Riggo me and you think alike. I'm sitting ther watching the game and shaking my head like" what the **** is going on. It looks like the players on defense have quit on Greg williams. I'm curious about this tape of Griffin and Rogers saying players layed down on defense. If that's true and 980 really plays it tomorrow morning...I am really curious to see how Gibbs adresses it at the press conference. I'm almost beginning to wonder if a starter needs to be cut outright as a statement to play hard or get the hell out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skins4481 Posted November 20, 2006 Share Posted November 20, 2006 I'm curious about this tape of Griffin and Rogers saying players layed down on defense. If that's true and 980 really plays it tomorrow morning...I am really curious to see how Gibbs adresses it at the press conference.I'm almost beginning to wonder if a starter needs to be cut outright as a statement to play hard or get the hell out. I vote for...HOLDMAN! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CGSKINS Posted November 20, 2006 Share Posted November 20, 2006 I'm curious about this tape of Griffin and Rogers saying players layed down on defense. If that's true and 980 really plays it tomorrow morning...I am really curious to see how Gibbs adresses it at the press conference.I'm almost beginning to wonder if a starter needs to be cut outright as a statement to play hard or get the hell out. Yea I tried to get streaming up on 980 but it would not work. We dont get 980 in richmond. If they did say that then they should be suspended. This was a horrific performance buy our D. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeHateMe Posted November 20, 2006 Share Posted November 20, 2006 Romo sits to pee has looked good but so far I have counted 4-5 balls that should've definitely been picks. Eventually his luck will run out and the defenders will hold on to the balls. And then what? He's a failure and we need to start the search all over again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redskin81 Posted November 20, 2006 Share Posted November 20, 2006 Romo sits to pee has looked good. Its 4 games lets not put him in canton just yet. Jc played better that I expected in his first start. Its way to soon to know what either one of these guys has long term. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevin11 Posted November 20, 2006 Share Posted November 20, 2006 I'm sorry about my earlier comment, I was pissed but Romo sits to pee hasn't proved to me that when he has absolutely no run game, we can play. Remember, he isn't a rookie and he should be playing pretty good if he was benched for 4 year. I'm just amazed that we did better against the dallas d than the colts did. I still think Romo sits to pee played okay, not the best in the nfl. Campbell played well under pressure and he made some good throws. In all, Romo sits to pee didn't win the game for you, Jones did. I know, I know, but when you guys got the run going, Romo sits to pee started to play very well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THEHEREAFTER Posted November 20, 2006 Share Posted November 20, 2006 In all, Romo sits to pee didn't win the game for you, Jones did. I know, I know, but when you guys got the run going, Romo sits to pee started to play very well. You're right but when you think about it, that's what a team win is. Our D and JJ deserve a lot of credit. Romo sits to pee was efficient and helped seal the win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RiggoReincarnated Posted November 20, 2006 Share Posted November 20, 2006 You're right but when you think about it, that's what a team win is. Our D and JJ deserve a lot of credit. Romo sits to pee was efficient and helped seal the win. Julius Jones only ran for about 70 yards though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THEHEREAFTER Posted November 20, 2006 Share Posted November 20, 2006 Julius Jones only ran for about 70 yards though. Jones ran for 79 yds and had 3 catches for 25 the majority of which came in the second half. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoony Posted November 20, 2006 Share Posted November 20, 2006 Call me crazy, but I still think its early on Romo sits to pee. And JC too, of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THEHEREAFTER Posted November 20, 2006 Share Posted November 20, 2006 Call me crazy, but I still think its early on Romo sits to pee. Of course it is but everyone has to start from somewhere. Even the greats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeHateMe Posted November 20, 2006 Share Posted November 20, 2006 Call me crazy, but I still think its early on Romo sits to pee.And JC too, of course. You're crazy. He's on his way to Canton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevin11 Posted November 20, 2006 Share Posted November 20, 2006 Barber and jones is a big duo though, it scares me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MisterPinstripe Posted November 20, 2006 Share Posted November 20, 2006 You're crazy.He's on his way to Canton. Uh... I really hope your joking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RiggoReincarnated Posted November 20, 2006 Share Posted November 20, 2006 Jones ran for 79 yds and had 3 catches for 25 the majority of which came in the second half. That's not really being a factor in the game is it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoony Posted November 20, 2006 Share Posted November 20, 2006 You're crazy.He's on his way to Canton. Of course it is but everyone has to start from somewhere. Even the greats. No doubt he's looked good, and the numbers certainly support that... but I've watched him play in 3 games now start to finish... and there just seems to be an intangible missing. Like today, there was a third down and 10, and he throws it to Crayton on a 5-yard in pattern with a DB draped all over him. NO chance to make the 1st down. I dunno, I feel like I've seen those kinds of things a few times from him... sort of that element. But I digress, he is still young, and has a long way to go. I might just be overly critical. After all, he is a cowpuke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeownU Posted November 20, 2006 Share Posted November 20, 2006 No doubt he's looked good, and the numbers certainly support that... but I've watched him play in 3 games now start to finish... and there just seems to be an intangible missing.Like today, there was a third down and 10, and he throws it to Crayton on a 5-yard in pattern with a DB draped all over him. NO chance to make the 1st down. I dunno, I feel like I've seen those kinds of things a few times from him... sort of that element. But I digress, he is still young, and has a long way to go. I might just be overly critical. After all, he is a cowpuke I agree. You're overly critical. Sure he checked down on the 3rd and 10, but you don't know what else was available. If nothing was out there, you're supposed to check down. The guys 3rd down percentage is through the roof. Its been 4 games, and he's looke GREAT in every one of them. And his qb rating is only 1 point from the best in the NFL. I know you all want to "hope" he's not the real deal, but he is. And deep down, you all know it. The cowboys are playing pretty good football right now. One crazy blocked fieldgoal from being 4-0 since Romo sits to pee has started. We are going to the playoffs, barring some unforseen injury to Romo sits to pee. After thanksgiving we will be 7-4 and sitting pretty. Our team is pretty young, and with Romo sits to pee now "the guy", we will be a contender in the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeHateMe Posted November 20, 2006 Share Posted November 20, 2006 Uh... I really hope your joking. Uh... turn on that sarcasm meter. I think its off. I guess the didnt give it away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeHateMe Posted November 20, 2006 Share Posted November 20, 2006 No doubt he's looked good, and the numbers certainly support that... but I've watched him play in 3 games now start to finish... and there just seems to be an intangible missing.Like today, there was a third down and 10, and he throws it to Crayton on a 5-yard in pattern with a DB draped all over him. NO chance to make the 1st down. I dunno, I feel like I've seen those kinds of things a few times from him... sort of that element. But I digress, he is still young, and has a long way to go. I might just be overly critical. After all, he is a cowpuke Thats actually strange. Today, yes, he did throw short on a couple of third downs. But since hes started, hes been money on third downs. Whether by air or by feet, thats the one area he's excelled. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhead36 Posted November 20, 2006 Author Share Posted November 20, 2006 Have the Skins and Boys ever had a QB rivalry? Of course I know the teams have been rivals but the Skins haven't really had a franchise QB, besides Jurgenson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeHateMe Posted November 20, 2006 Share Posted November 20, 2006 Have the Skins and Boys ever had a QB rivalry? Of course I know the teams have been rivals but the Skins haven't really had a franchise QB, besides Jurgenson. Joey T? And Rypien for a short while, no? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhead36 Posted November 20, 2006 Author Share Posted November 20, 2006 Joey T? And Rypien for a short while, no? But I mean like, did they have a direct rivalry with a counterpart on another team? Kind of like Manning/Brady or something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dogunwo Posted November 20, 2006 Share Posted November 20, 2006 Not really.The Redskins OL isnt great, but its better then the Cowboys. Cooley is about the same level as Witten. The only slight advantage they have over us on offense is at WR, and that should be negated by our advantage at OL. When Portis is healthy we are better at RB, without Portis its a push. I'd have to disagree there. Witten is better than Cooley, not light years, but definitely better. And JJ/MB3 is DEFINITELY better than Ladell Betts/Mike Sellers or TJ Duckett. Yes, with Portis they are better, but you are really overrating Betts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DWinzit Posted November 20, 2006 Share Posted November 20, 2006 And JJ/MB3 is DEFINITELY better than Ladell Betts/Mike Sellers or TJ Duckett. I would like to see Duckett/Sellers start a game and get a majority of the carries with Betts as the change up befoe wirting them off! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.