EnFoRcEr_uPu Posted July 14, 2006 Share Posted July 14, 2006 http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/5781908 "6. Mark Brunell, quarterback, Redskins In the first half of the 2005 season, the Redskins lefty was among the NFL's more efficient quarterbacks. In the second half of the season, he was an eye sore. Brunell's play down the stretch was rather abysmal. And the oft-injured quarterback missed a portion of mini-camp in 2006 after fracturing a finger on his throwing hand. Washington is loaded with offensive talent after adding Brandon Lloyd and Antwaan Randle El to Santana Moss, Clinton Portis, Chris Cooley, and a sturdy starting five on the offensive line. And the most significant pickup Washington made this off-season was bringing Al Saunders on board to calls plays. If Brunell can execute the Saunders playbook, the Redskins are a Super Bowl threat. If he can't keep himself on the field, they aren't a playoff team. (For the record, I love Jason Campbell's upside, but he might have to go through some growing pains if forced to play)." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnFoRcEr_uPu Posted July 14, 2006 Author Share Posted July 14, 2006 Probably the most down-to-earth and honest opinion of the status of the Redskins in a while. Brunell, hands down, is the biggest "?" to our success this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIGPHILLY Posted July 14, 2006 Share Posted July 14, 2006 Let's not forget BRUNELL was basically finished before he had a nice season last year. Banking on a major ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burgold Posted July 14, 2006 Share Posted July 14, 2006 Almost fair, you can hardly say Mark's second half was an eyesore when they ended the season 5-0. The injury did lead to some stink, but I'd hardly qualify Dallas and the Giants as poorly played games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SantanaIght89 Posted July 14, 2006 Share Posted July 14, 2006 stay healthy big mark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illone Posted July 14, 2006 Share Posted July 14, 2006 Nothing groundbreaking here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gutlead74 Posted July 14, 2006 Share Posted July 14, 2006 Let's not forget BRUNELL was basically finished before he had a nice season last year. Banking on a major ? uhh perhaps he wasnt finished:doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted July 14, 2006 Share Posted July 14, 2006 :doh: another Myth Brunell's playing didn't tell off the second half, just his attempts (and fewer passes means less total yards), his YPA and TD/INT ratio, Completion % stayed close to the same, and so did his QB rating. It wasn't until his knee shot against the Giants (when he was 7-11 at the time), that his accuracy was off, against Philly he was just 9/25 and Tampa in the playoffs 7/15 that everyone refers to as the "second half" of the season against Seattle he was 22/37 showing he was getting better for someone who was so terrible , his accuracy rating sure was pretty high tied for 4th overall by KC Joyner stats :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYSkins1 Posted July 14, 2006 Share Posted July 14, 2006 Has anyone else noticed that our biggest Question Mark is a guy named "Mark"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeSkins Posted July 14, 2006 Share Posted July 14, 2006 I think the week 8 bye will help us a lot more than the week 3 bye did last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKM311 Posted July 14, 2006 Share Posted July 14, 2006 Has anyone else noticed that our biggest Question Mark is a guy named "Mark"? :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCB Posted July 14, 2006 Share Posted July 14, 2006 Nothing groundbreaking here. Au contraire! I just learned (by skimming the whole article) that a guy named Pork Chop plays in the league. I feel edified. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TC4 Posted July 14, 2006 Share Posted July 14, 2006 Do these guys ever stop to think when they talk about how Brunell tailed off last season that it might have also been due to the fact that David Patten got hurt and so as a result, Santana Moss got a lot more double coverages directed his way, and seeing as he was the #1 WR to begin with, it made it a LOT HARDER to get the ball to him? If Moss, Brandon Lloyd, and Antwaan Randle-El all stay healthy, and the O-line does the job it is capable of doing and keeps Brunell upright, this could be a HUGE YEAR!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeSkins Posted July 14, 2006 Share Posted July 14, 2006 Au contraire! I just learned (by skimming the whole article) that a guy named Pork Chop plays in the league. I feel edified. To further the learning experience, his real name is Floyd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnLockesGhost Posted July 14, 2006 Share Posted July 14, 2006 Do these guys ever stop to think when they talk about how Brunell tailed off last season that it might have also been due to the fact that David Patten got hurt and so as a result, Santana Moss got a lot more double coverages directed his way, and seeing as he was the #1 WR to begin with, it made it a LOT HARDER to get the ball to him?If Moss, Brandon Lloyd, and Antwaan Randle-El all stay healthy, and the O-line does the job it is capable of doing and keeps Brunell upright, this could be a HUGE YEAR!!!! Not just Patten, but James Thrash as well. Thrash was pretty effective as our third receiver early in the year, but he got hurt late too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CPstretch Posted July 14, 2006 Share Posted July 14, 2006 he is the only question mark that i see on the skins roster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrtacconi Posted July 14, 2006 Share Posted July 14, 2006 i truly believe that if mark stays healthy (as in no minor injuries at all) we could seriously take it all this year. i hope and pray everyday, I'm so ready for tears of joy. HTTR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatmeworry Posted July 15, 2006 Share Posted July 15, 2006 It wasn' Mark's fault the offense sputtered. And just as a reminder we did win six straight while he was an 'eye sore'. That said last year we had one deep threat. With the return of Patten we now have four. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XxSpearheadxX Posted July 15, 2006 Share Posted July 15, 2006 Mark was part of the reason, lets not totally take the blame away from him. Granted he was banged up, but really he had a good year not a great one - Santana wasn't just "a deep threat" he was one of, if not THE, most dangerous WR in the NFL last year - a QB should be able to do something with that and a TE like Cooley. edit: Brunell's biggest problem is that he doesn't always seem to see the whole field IMO. I don't think he will do that this year though, or Lloyd and El will be in his ear. Taylor Jacobs ran route after route last year wide open and Brunell never threw him the ball, unless he was covered. Our losses last year were team losses and our struggles were team struggles. Thank god for CP and our defense, that is all I have to say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeSkins Posted July 15, 2006 Share Posted July 15, 2006 It wasn' Mark's fault the offense sputtered. And just as a reminder we did win six straight while he was an 'eye sore'. That said last year we had one deep threat. With the return of Patten we now have four. Let's not mistake David Patten for a deep threat any longer. He's a pretty good reciever, that's the extent of it. Moss had more 40+ yard catches last year than Patten's had in his career. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CapitalDefense Posted July 15, 2006 Share Posted July 15, 2006 I think the week 8 bye will help us a lot more than the week 3 bye did last year.Bingo, a mid season break is always good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bulldog Posted July 15, 2006 Share Posted July 15, 2006 Brunell threw 4 touchdowns in the second Dallas game near the end of the season so I don't know that his second half was all that poor :laugh: I think what you have to do is take the second half games BEFORE he got hit by Nick Griesen on the knee and the games he played AFTER that injury. That is the point at which the deep passing game disappeared and the offense began to stagnate against the Eagles and in the playoffs against the Bucs and Seahawks. Brunell said at the time the knee wasn't a problem, but who seeing those performances believes that? If you are a 6'2 quarterback who suffers a plant foot injury, your ability to throw the ball is going to be compromised. Brunell is not a 6'5, 230 pounder like Roethlisberger that can still throw a ball 50 yards off his back foot. He has to be able to step into this passes or there is no velocity, jump to them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyDigital Posted July 15, 2006 Share Posted July 15, 2006 What Im worried about is if Mark Brunell Gets an injury that isnt significant to force him to miss games but is significant enough to drastically reduce his ability to be an efficient QB, will he take one for the team and pull himself out, or will he be a selfish SOB and keep himself in there knowing his career is most assuredly OVER if JC gets in there? Well I already know the answer because this very same situation happened the past TWO seasons. Brunells first year he had an injury, dont remember exactly what it was, but it wasnt so serious that he couldnt play at all, so he kept on playing and was PATHETIC. And last season after Brunells injury in the giants game he put himself back in the starting line up the very next week and he was PATHETIC after that. The onus is on the Skins coaching staff to PULL Mark Brunell as soon as he gets injured, no matter how small the injury. There is NO DOUBT in my mind that JC will be able to pull a Rothlisberger and be tremendously successful as soon as he gets put in there. Why? HE HAS ALL THE NESESSARY RESOURCES around him. Great Offensive Coordinater, Great O-Line, Great WR's, and Spectacular RB. With all of that, Campbell should EASILY be able to utilize his natural talent to take this team to the next level. I HATE MARK BRUNELL! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnFoRcEr_uPu Posted July 15, 2006 Author Share Posted July 15, 2006 What Im worried about is if Mark Brunell Gets an injury that isnt significant to force him to miss games but is significant enough to drastically reduce his ability to be an efficient QB, will he take one for the team and pull himself out, or will he be a selfish SOB and keep himself in there knowing his career is most assuredly OVER if JC gets in there? Well I already know the answer because this very same situation happened the past TWO seasons. Brunells first year he had an injury, dont remember exactly what it was, but it wasnt so serious that he couldnt play at all, so he kept on playing and was PATHETIC. And last season after Brunells injury in the giants game he put himself back in the starting line up the very next week and he was PATHETIC after that. The onus is on the Skins coaching staff to PULL Mark Brunell as soon as he gets injured, no matter how small the injury. There is NO DOUBT in my mind that JC will be able to pull a Rothlisberger and be tremendously successful as soon as he gets put in there. Why? HE HAS ALL THE NESESSARY RESOURCES around him. Great Offensive Coordinater, Great O-Line, Great WR's, and Spectacular RB. With all of that, Campbell should EASILY be able to utilize his natural talent to take this team to the next level. I HATE MARK BRUNELL! Wow. I have you to hand it to you, you certainly do have talent. You managed to ruin a perfectly good long post in just 4 words. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfos81 Posted July 15, 2006 Share Posted July 15, 2006 http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/5781908"6. Mark Brunell, quarterback, Redskins In the first half of the 2005 season, the Redskins lefty was among the NFL's more efficient quarterbacks. In the second half of the season, he was an eye sore. Brunell's play down the stretch was rather abysmal. And the oft-injured quarterback missed a portion of mini-camp in 2006 after fracturing a finger on his throwing hand. Washington is loaded with offensive talent after adding Brandon Lloyd and Antwaan Randle El to Santana Moss, Clinton Portis, Chris Cooley, and a sturdy starting five on the offensive line. And the most significant pickup Washington made this off-season was bringing Al Saunders on board to calls plays. If Brunell can execute the Saunders playbook, the Redskins are a Super Bowl threat. If he can't keep himself on the field, they aren't a playoff team. (For the record, I love Jason Campbell's upside, but he might have to go through some growing pains if forced to play)." We are a superbowl threat now. I can't wait to witness it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.