headhunter39 Posted July 7, 2006 Share Posted July 7, 2006 this isnt at all a political thread, but i just wondered where we will have to go to war next. if we can fix the iran and korea situations with diplomacy, then who will we invade next?...under any administration Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted July 7, 2006 Share Posted July 7, 2006 Likely order of chances if those two work out. 1 Syria 2 N Africa 3 Venezuela 4 China Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PleaseBlitz Posted July 7, 2006 Share Posted July 7, 2006 Canada. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
headhunter39 Posted July 7, 2006 Author Share Posted July 7, 2006 Canada. most likely....damn canadians:mad: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
headhunter39 Posted July 7, 2006 Author Share Posted July 7, 2006 Likely order of chances if those two work out.1 Syria 2 N Africa 3 Venezuela 4 China we wont go to war with china or venezuela unless they attacked us and i dont believe they would, the other two are circumstancial...but where in north africa? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CurseReversed Posted July 7, 2006 Share Posted July 7, 2006 Hopefully nowhere, our muscles are big enough to scare most into submission without having to use them. And pretty much any country on earth would be a fool to actually act preemtively against us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted July 7, 2006 Share Posted July 7, 2006 we wont go to war with china or venezuela unless they attacked us and i dont believe they would, the other two are circumstancial...but where in north africa? Niether do I ,as far as N Africa? 1 Darfur 2 Sudan 3 Chad 4 Nigeria 5 Khartoum Even Egypt has potential though Yemen should probably be added to the other list@ 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted July 7, 2006 Share Posted July 7, 2006 Canada. I thought we bought them off Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
headhunter39 Posted July 7, 2006 Author Share Posted July 7, 2006 Niether do I ,as far as N Africa?1 Darfur 2 Sudan 3 Chad 4 Nigeria 5 Khartoum Even Egypt has potential though Yemen should probably be added to the other list@ 4 those places would probably be more like bosnia or somalia, so not exactly a full invasion like iraq Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
headhunter39 Posted July 7, 2006 Author Share Posted July 7, 2006 Hopefully nowhere, our muscles are big enough to scare most into submission without having to use them. And pretty much any country on earth would be a fool to actually act preemtively against us. eventually somone will **** with us. sooner or later Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted July 7, 2006 Share Posted July 7, 2006 those places would probably be more like bosnia or somalia, so not exactly a full invasion like iraq Of course not total war, but Iraq was not even a full invasion per se. :2cents: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
headhunter39 Posted July 7, 2006 Author Share Posted July 7, 2006 Of course not total war, but Iraq was not even a full invasion per se. :2cents: iraq was no d-day but it still was a pretty big invasion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted July 7, 2006 Share Posted July 7, 2006 Well Iraq had a large force,but going by traditional standards many generals would have preferred at least doubling the troop level used. It is a interesting subject, comparing the new vs the old doctrine of overwhelming numbers and the risks and benefits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Midnight Judges Posted July 7, 2006 Share Posted July 7, 2006 ask the PNAC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
headhunter39 Posted July 7, 2006 Author Share Posted July 7, 2006 i predict china will someday have a civil war, and we will support the rebels and north korea will threaten to invade south korea and we will have a very very big mess, but i doubt that will happen for some time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsHokieFan Posted July 7, 2006 Share Posted July 7, 2006 ask the PNAC. Finally find your tin foil hat? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckydevil Posted July 7, 2006 Share Posted July 7, 2006 Finally find your tin foil hat? That's right they have no influence, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted July 8, 2006 Share Posted July 8, 2006 That's right they have no influence, Well if you look at a list of those affiliated with it,the notion they would have no influence would be kinda stupid wouldn't it? Are you saying they should forfiet thier rights because you disagree with thier opinions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
headhunter39 Posted July 8, 2006 Author Share Posted July 8, 2006 i dont know what u people are talking about anymore:( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckydevil Posted July 8, 2006 Share Posted July 8, 2006 Well if you look at a list of those affiliated with it,the notion they would have no influence would be kinda stupid wouldn't it? my point exactly Are you saying they should forfiet thier rights because you disagree with thier opinions? Uh, no. They have every right to spew their naive, dangerous, and utopian vision/views. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
headhunter39 Posted July 8, 2006 Author Share Posted July 8, 2006 this is my own thread and i dont even understand what is going on:doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckydevil Posted July 8, 2006 Share Posted July 8, 2006 this is my own thread and i dont even understand what is going on:doh: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
headhunter39 Posted July 8, 2006 Author Share Posted July 8, 2006 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century thanks that explains alot. i thought u guys were using code words or something Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted July 8, 2006 Share Posted July 8, 2006 i dont know what u people are talking about anymore:( PNAC is a group of powerfull,smart and wealthy CONSERVATIVE individuals that the left thinks controls the world. scoll down on the loopy link for some names associated with pnac if you wish. http://www.opednews.com/new%20american%20century.htm L is just pining for the good ole days of Berger Pay no mind :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
headhunter39 Posted July 8, 2006 Author Share Posted July 8, 2006 "The chairman is William Kristol, editor of the Weekly Standard and a regular contributor to the Fox News Channel." how can u take anyone seriously if they are a regular contributor to FOX NEWS? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.