CBass1724 Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 on the bottom line on espnews it said "ESPN.com's Michael Smith reports the Redskins and WR Antwaan Randle-El agree to a six-year deal." Lets not make a SKEPTICAL over the Times' career here! lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taco Bell Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 well the ticker on espn says Michael Smith reports the Redskins and Antwaan Randle-el agree to 6 year deal, not sure if thats a new name to report it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gamebreaker Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 I doubt the Times are right, but I wish they were. Randle El is not a #2 reciever, he is not better than Lloyd. Didn't he say he wanted to leave the Steelers to be a full-time starter? Why would he sign here to be out #3 reciever? Either he's going to become a locker room problem, or Brandon Lloyd will, because we all know he has an ego and he won't want to be demoted from a starter to a slot reciever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fdarugar Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 I mean this just came out of no where...the times could have something with this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrunellSuperbowl Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 the times is a clown paper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waterwagen Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 I doubt the Times are right, but I wish they were. Randle El is not a #2 reciever, he is not better than Lloyd. Didn't he say he wanted to leave the Steelers to be a full-time starter? Why would he sign here to be out #3 reciever? If we run 3 WR sets, as is being reported, then he WILL be a starter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingdaddy Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 http://espn.go.com/ ESPN is confirming this deal, complete with numbers in the deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 Randel-El may have told 'ffin that there was no deal, nothings offical until the league approves it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Love_Them_Dirtbags Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 Pastabelly over at ESPN probably started these rumors that we'd signed Randle El, just to piss him off and make him sign elsewhere... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
igor85 Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 Dude the Post has it that they signed RE! Check it out! http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/12/AR2006031200639.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kwitt Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 I doubt the Times are right, but I wish they were. Randle El is not a #2 reciever, he is not better than Lloyd. Didn't he say he wanted to leave the Steelers to be a full-time starter? Why would he sign here to be out #3 reciever? Either he's going to become a locker room problem, or Brandon Lloyd will, because we all know he has an ego and he won't want to be demoted from a starter to a slot reciever. Some people will poo-poo anything the FO does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrunellSuperbowl Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 I mean this just came out of no where...the times could have something with this. YEAH IT CAME OUT OF NO WHERE. Even though Randel EL was sitting next to Campbell at the Wizards game . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRobi21 Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 I mean this just came out of no where...the times could have something with this. Don't say that it scares me, I've already added him to the skins on madden 06, along w/ Lloyd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CBass1724 Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 6 yrs $31 mil $10 mil signing bonus per michael smith Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enter Apotheosis Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 I trust the Post way more than I trust the Times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrunellSuperbowl Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 I doubt the Times are right, but I wish they were. Randle El is not a #2 reciever, he is not better than Lloyd. Didn't he say he wanted to leave the Steelers to be a full-time starter? Why would he sign here to be out #3 reciever? Either he's going to become a locker room problem, or Brandon Lloyd will, because we all know he has an ego and he won't want to be demoted from a starter to a slot reciever. Just making up things as you go. He was the second reciever on the super bowl winning team. But he is not good enough for us? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor21_INT_4_TD Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 dude si.com doesnt have nothing about a deal being done but they have the egde deal on there..... i hope they wrong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MumboSauce Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 I didnt know we were targeting Fauria @ TE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enter Apotheosis Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 6 yrs $31 mil $10 mil signing bonus per michael smith Wow... thats almost the same contract we offered Santana. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor 36 Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 The Post is saying that they have a source confirming the signing: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/12/AR2006031200639.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CBass1724 Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 oh and no matter how many problems this might cause....i kinda like having too many good players to choose from to start. boo hoo us, poor skins to have too many good players. GO DANNY BOY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingdaddy Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 6 years, 31 mil, which includes a 10 mil signing bonus. Ridiculous numbers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dead Money Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 Good maybe Gibbs read my posts today!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Execution56 Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 Clayton said it went down...the people from the Times are idiots!!! YEAH ... what he said ... :applause: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLongshot Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 Some people will poo-poo anything the FO does. Or some just call it as we see it. Really, I have a problem when we sign a guy who only cleared 600 yards once, and he was the #2 WR option in Pittsburgh. I'd like to be wrong on this, but we do have other needs as well, and the veteran DEs are disappearing quickly. Jason Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.