RDSKNFN_48 Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 BRUCE IS GOING BACK TO THE RAMS http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2362534 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieselPwr44 Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 Great news. He's about done. Don't know why anyone here would want him. There are better options in free agency than an old wr in the twighlight of his career. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
da#1skinsfan Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 Good!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oldskool Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 Yes! One down. Now we need Randle-El and Givens to resign and for some other team to make a mistake and sign Antonio Bryant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Truant Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 Awesome! We really didn't need another older, smallish, WR clearly on the decline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinz1972 Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 good 2 we need a young buck.................................... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terpfan Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 Yeah I have to agree, there are better fish in the sea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ernie5 Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 Excellent. I didn't see that as a great move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redskns21 Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 He is making around $6M this year under his new contract. That is way too much and I don't think that he would have made that with this regime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
authentic Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 wheew!! thank you, we didn't need another 'Irvin Fryer' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingGibbs Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 Good. He's getting long in the tooth. I was surprised how many people wanted him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ImmortalDragon Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 He deserves to retire as a Ram. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RDSKNFN_48 Posted March 10, 2006 Author Share Posted March 10, 2006 I'm glad that the Bruce temptation is no longer a factor. I feel they've been granted a second life with this CBA extension now they need to be smart about FO decisions. You'd think they'd learn their lesson w/ Coles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bryceb07 Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 Why did anyoen want him anyways ? He should retire as RAM sucking there , not here ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HailYeah Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 Funny how this thread is unanimously relieved. I wonder how many would hop on the Bruce bandwagon had we signed him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McMetal Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 Well, some of you are probably too young to remember, but we did ok with the last "over the hill" Rams receiver we signed - Henry Ellard. The man was a First Down Machine. Besides, it's slim pickings with this year's FA WR crop... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
More Complete Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 Yes! One down. Now we need Randle-El and Givens to resign and for some other team to make a mistake and sign Antonio Bryant. So we can sign who? Lloyd? Robinson? :whoknows: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Hog Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 His health was a concern last year. It's always nice to add a veteran presence who commands respect from opposing defensive backfields, but at this point in his career let's face it, any attention that Bruce receives is largely a result of his name and past production. Over the long haul, I don't think he's enough in and of himself to take the heat off Santana. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grego Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 "Limited to 11 appearances in 2005 because of injuries, Bruce had 36 catches and 525 yards, his lowest totals since 1998" sheesh. 6 mill for an old player with those numbers? larceny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigRay Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 I really couldn't see him anywhere else but with the Rams really so it's fitting that he remains a Ram.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oldskool Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 So we can sign who? Lloyd? Robinson? :whoknows: cough ** Joe Jurevicius ** cough Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedskinsFanatic Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 I'm glad that the Bruce temptation is no longer a factor. I feel they've been granted a second life with this CBA extension now they need to be smart about FO decisions.You'd think they'd learn their lesson w/ Coles. What lesson is that? Coles is a really good reciever still...he just didn't work out here. That thought made no sense to me. :logo: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mookie0720 Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 :applause: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kosher Ham Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 I expected him to return all along. It makes sense for him. He will retire as a Ram and that is a rarity in this modern NFL. I commend him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jivelikenice Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 That's great news.....We need to build around young, up & coming players.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.