COOOOLEY! Posted March 2, 2006 Share Posted March 2, 2006 "the way lavar's contract is he probably wolnt be cut" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiefPowhatan17 Posted March 2, 2006 Share Posted March 2, 2006 This is true, it would hurt us more to cut him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThornWithin Posted March 2, 2006 Share Posted March 2, 2006 "the way lavar's contract is he probably wolnt be cut" Well yes. As far as I know, he would *cost* you money to cut. They sure aren't going to keep him because they like him. It's because right now they are trying to turn 17 million dollars over into 0...not make it worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingGibbs Posted March 2, 2006 Share Posted March 2, 2006 Well, for us #56 fans this is about the only good news thus far in regards to the CBA fiasco. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TLusby Posted March 2, 2006 Share Posted March 2, 2006 There's only $500k of difference and of course Danny has to pony up $6.5M. I think w/o a CBA Clemmons will be on the weakside, or McCune in the Mike and Marshall at WLB and LA's contract will be history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NavyDave Posted March 2, 2006 Share Posted March 2, 2006 Didn't we talk about this yesterday in the JohnThompson and other threads? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.