36SKINS56 Posted March 1, 2006 Share Posted March 1, 2006 http://www.nflfans.com/x/archive/index.php/t-7446.html Is there any explanation out there besides for "the media hates the Redskins" for why we and not the Cheifs, Raiders, Jets or Broncos will have to play with 20 rookies. If you look at the above link, you will see that all of those team are going to be in worse cap situations then the Redskins headin into tommorow (assuming the CBA doesnt get fixed). Is there a reason besides for King and Pastabelly hating us? I am getting confused as to why every article I read says that we have to feild 20 rookies, while KC and Broncos will have no problem in a bidding war for TO. Please explain, and if this has already been brought up, I couldnt find it, so please send me in the right direction. Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnFoRcEr_uPu Posted March 1, 2006 Share Posted March 1, 2006 I'm pretty sure we are in the worse cap situation to be honest. While others may have larger contracts with their players, I think ours are actually more per-season than the other teams on that list. Especially with signing bonuses(we have 2 alone that are over $4m). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaliforniaSkin Posted March 1, 2006 Share Posted March 1, 2006 Because other teams that are as much over the cap as we are have one or more high priced players that they can cut for a big cap savings. We don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnFoRcEr_uPu Posted March 1, 2006 Share Posted March 1, 2006 Because other teams that are as much over the cap as we are have one or more high priced players that they can cut for a big cap savings. We don't. That too. Although i don't know who the Jets could have that is that expensive now that Ty Law is gone, lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.