trez Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 4.34 unofficial. Wow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oaty49 Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 4.34 unofficial. Wow. Doesn't matter, he'll be gone before we get a pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
In Flames Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 anyone remember what santana ran the 40 in? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#1SkinsFan Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 If we trade up, we could get him. He'll probably be a late 1st, early second round pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sherlock Holmes Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 Doesn't matter, he'll be gone before we get a pick. whats his projected round? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
autographcollector Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 Why would we trade up for a wideout? We need a d-lineman with our first pick...sorry guys... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ERIC THE REDskinsfan Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 Just watched that. Yeah he's got some quicks. Where's he projected to go? I know they were saying he was a little disappointing in terms of production at the U. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinfan2k Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 Why would we trade up for a wideout? We need a d-lineman with our first pick...sorry guys... haven't you heard we are trying to get a WR, maybe thru free agency and/or draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Combatant Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 anyone remember what santana ran the 40 in? http://espn.go.com/melkiper/s/2001/0307/1136944.html The following notable players didn't run at the NFL combine: Michael Vick, QB, Virginia Tech Chris Weinke, QB, Florida St. James Jackson, RB,Miami (Fla.) Ja'Mar Toombs, RB, Texas A&M Kevan Barlow, RB, Pittsburgh Travis Henry, RB, Tennessee Rudi Johnson, RB, Auburn Lamont Jordan, RB, Maryland Chris Chambers, WR, Wisconsin Rod Gardner, WR, Clemson Scotty Anderson, WR, Grambling Robert Kilow, WR, Arkansas St. Quincy Morgan, WR, Kansas St. David Terrell, WR, Michigan Reggie Wayne, WR, Miami (Fla.) Santana Moss, WR, Miami (Fla.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#1SkinsFan Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 Just watched that. Yeah he's got some quicks. Where's he projected to go? I know they were saying he was a little disappointing in terms of production at the U. He's projected as a late first, early second rounder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
autographcollector Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 haven't you heard we are trying to get a WR, maybe thru free agency and/or draft. Yeah but not with our early pick. We need aa big reciever...not another small guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oaty49 Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 Yeah but not with our early pick. We need aa big reciever...not another small guy. Maurice Stovall is our best option, in my opinion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edgun88 Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 anyone remember what santana ran the 40 in? 4.27 officially Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RDSKNfaithfull Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 Is that a surprise to you? Everybody in the world knows he is fast but fast doesn't make you the best reciever. Antonio Brown is fast. Moss had like 89 catches in his career in Miami. He is a guy that will take time to develop in the NFL Kind of like Santatna but not as pollished. He will take 3-4 years to become productive and then his contract will come up and he will go somewhere else like Santana did Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FootballGuy2677 Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 Why would we trade up for a wideout? We need a d-lineman with our first pick...sorry guys... Lol:laugh: .... No sorry, we didnt lose to seattle becuase of our defence. Let alone lose to OAKLAND becuase of our defence. We need offense. Hopfully your notice that before draft time so when we draft a wide reciever you wont be an idiot whos on these boards screaming 'WERE DOOMED! WERE DOOMED! WE DRAFTED A WIDE RECIEVER INSTEAD OF A DEFENSIVE END! WE SUCK AT DRAFTING WIDE RECIEVERS!!!!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RDSKNfaithfull Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 Lol:laugh: ....No sorry, we didnt lose to seattle becuase of our defence. Let alone lose to OAKLAND becuase of our defence. We need offense. Hopfully your notice that before draft time so when we draft a wide reciever you wont be an idiot whos on these boards screaming 'WERE DOOMED! WERE DOOMED! WE DRAFTED A WIDE RECIEVER INSTEAD OF A DEFENSIVE END! WE SUCK AT DRAFTING WIDE RECIEVERS!!!!" Wow you think a rookie like Sinorace would help next year? Sorry but the transition on defense is easier than Offense and you will get a impact next year. If you really want to get into it we really need a corner. Our defense took a step back last year and if we ignore it it will take another build on our strenghths Offense will come together its more timing and continuity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warpath11 Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 Chad Jackson from Florida ran an unofficial 4.29 earlier this morning. Im sure when it becomes official it will be in the 4.35 range but still fast as hell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweet Sassy Molassy Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 4.27 officially Holy Damn that's fast! I didn't realize Santana was that fast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laxpunk2006 Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 Wow you think a rookie like Sinorace would help next year? Sorry but the transition on defense is easier than Offense and you will get a impact next year. If you really want to get into it we really need a corner. Our defense took a step back last year and if we ignore it it will take another build on our strenghths Offense will come together its more timing and continuity. We can't ignore either side. A WR may take a year or two to develop but we might as well start now. We aren't going to land a young, big time reciever in free agency with the way our cap is. Our best bet to get a top tier guy is going to be the draft and developing him ourselves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kentuckyskinsfan Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 Can you imagion......both mosses running at full speed on opposite sides of the field, which one would Brunell throw to? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
e16bball Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 Can you imagion......both mosses running at full speed on opposite sides of the field, which one would Brunell throw to? Depends on which one is on the half of the field Brunell happens to be locked in on that play... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peregrine Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 Ive heard hes a mid second rounder. Could be his draft status goes up, and thats what people anticipate, but its not completely out of the woods to get him in the 2nd round. Jacobs was supposed to be 1st round, we got him in the second. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hiswadeness Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 just because he is fast that doesn't mean he can play football. Besides I think we need a big no. 2 WR not another no. 3 guy. patten already fills the no.3 role, but I guess Al Saunders can use any WR's he wants. Seeing as how it worked well in KC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meetST Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 just because he is fast that doesn't mean he can play football. Besides I think we need a big no. 2 WR not another no. 3 guy. patten already fills the no.3 role, but I guess Al Saunders can use any WR's he wants. Seeing as how it worked well in KC i don't really have a problem with what u said except the first sentence. he's fast and he CAN play football Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ItaliaMuscle Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 lol this thread has shifted from where it originally started... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.