tr1 Posted February 19, 2006 Share Posted February 19, 2006 The teams share their national revenues equally, but the success of the Redskins and some other clubs in increasing streams of unshared local revenues has led to a fractious internal debate in which the less-prosperous franchises are seeking to have more of those revenues shared."There's a lot of infighting on their side," Upshaw said. "They don't believe they're going to have to do this, but that's the only way the low-revenue clubs can afford their commitment to us. My understanding is that there's a group of nine [wealthy teams] that's saying, 'If you force us into more revenue sharing, we'll sue you.' " http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/18/AR2006021801300.html My guess as to who they are: Redskins Cowboys Patriots Bears Miami San Francisco Giants Raiders Denver Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pocono Posted February 19, 2006 Share Posted February 19, 2006 I think they are formed from the ranks of the teams who make the most local revenue so you'd find the Eagles and the Texans there for sure and probably the Browns. http://www.forbes.com/lists/2005/30/Rank_1.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Die Hard Posted February 19, 2006 Share Posted February 19, 2006 http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=145129 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.