HoyaSkins28 Posted February 19, 2006 Share Posted February 19, 2006 I'm just curious to see what you guys think about our current "realistic" situtation about the Skins two biggest needs. DE and WR. What would you guys rather, getting a good WR and drafting a DE or getting a good DE and drafting a WR. I personally would rather the first option because I think it's easier to develop a good DE than a WR. WHat do you guys think. Hail! :logo: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FootballGuy2677 Posted February 19, 2006 Share Posted February 19, 2006 Draft whoever is avaible in order. 2nd Round: Chad Jackson, Martin Nance,Mike Hass, Maurice Stovall, Jason Avant, Hank Baskett. 3rd Round: Victor Adeyanju/DE/Indiana Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USDsk8ter123 Posted February 19, 2006 Share Posted February 19, 2006 our need is greater at wide reciever so i would do the first option Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roadkill Posted February 19, 2006 Share Posted February 19, 2006 yeah whatever is available but I would rather choose option #1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[[ghost]] Posted February 19, 2006 Share Posted February 19, 2006 chad jackson... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adamyesme1111 Posted February 19, 2006 Share Posted February 19, 2006 Depends on what was available in the draft, like if a good WR was available that shouldve gone by then then get the DE in Free Agency and Vice versa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chairmangao Posted February 19, 2006 Share Posted February 19, 2006 I doubt we will take a WR in the 2nd round. WRs usually take a while to become adjusted to the NFL whereas DEs can come in without missing a beat. This coming year is precious for us, and Gibbs will get a #2 WR through FA and DE through the draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ImmortalDragon Posted February 19, 2006 Share Posted February 19, 2006 I hope we take a DE in the 2nd and a WR in the 3rd, depending on who is available. Obviously we're going to have to find another way to get a #2 WR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinklein Posted February 19, 2006 Share Posted February 19, 2006 I'm going to go ahead and state the obvious here. By getting our hands on a prospective Free Agent, we are going for immediate gratification. Getting a rookie will probably help us in the long run. None, however, are gaurantees. Personally I'd love to see us get a Free Agent, because even the late draft picks can turn into something special. Just ask Tom Brady. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sherlock Holmes Posted February 19, 2006 Share Posted February 19, 2006 i thought chad jackson was predicted to go in the first round.....anyways i wouldnt touch a florida WR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CowboySlayer Posted February 19, 2006 Share Posted February 19, 2006 ]']chad jackson... exactly what i thought......a de isnt gonna give you the extra spark you need to win a sb like a wr can Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atloldskin Posted February 19, 2006 Share Posted February 19, 2006 We want to fill the WR position in FA. Draft a young DE and TE. Then draft depth at OL and CB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fdarugar Posted February 19, 2006 Share Posted February 19, 2006 We will get a free agent WR and possibly draft one, I can see us using a couple of picks on the DL including the 2nd rounder. WR will be priority #1 on the skins free agent front. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tundey Posted February 19, 2006 Share Posted February 19, 2006 Very simple. The defense has been tops in the last 2 seasons so lack of a pass-rushing DE hasn't been debilitating (at least not severely). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.