Jman1119446 Posted February 17, 2006 Share Posted February 17, 2006 I have a question for everyone. If we did no large moves, and went into the season with the same basic team as this year, do we win more games or do we take a step back? I think, that if we do nothing, we will be a better team. Patten will be coming back (while that might not add much it is better that Taylor of Parris playing), Al Saunders is going to improve the O. Carlos Rogers will have a year under his belt and Harris can then move back to nickle. Plus, you can never stress enough what keeping a team together does for team cohesion. I feel that we are a passing game away from winning everything, and that can be fixed with grooming JC. While I would love to see a big name come to DC, I would like to see the Redskins win with true Redskins players, not outsiders who finally decided to come to DC just because we are starting to get good. I want to win with the players who have helped turn this ship around. There are always rookies that could add to the team. But hey, lets go out and get TO and be good for one year. That would be a hell of ride. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DoGood28 Posted February 17, 2006 Share Posted February 17, 2006 I have a question for everyone. If we did no large moves, and went into the season with the same basic team as this year, do we win more games or do we take a step back?I think, that if we do nothing, we will be a better team. Patten will be coming back (while that might not add much it is better that Taylor of Parris playing), Al Saunders is going to improve the O. Carlos Rogers will have a year under his belt and Harris can then move back to nickle. Plus, you can never stress enough what keeping a team together does for team cohesion. I feel that we are a passing game away from winning everything, and that can be fixed with grooming JC. While I would love to see a big name come to DC, I would like to see the Redskins win with true Redskins players, not outsiders who finally decided to come to DC just because we are starting to get good. I want to win with the players who have helped turn this ship around. There are always rookies that could add to the team. But hey, lets go out and get TO and be good for one year. That would be a hell of ride. I share the same feelings. I would want to become a Patriots-like team. I don't want to bet the farm to win one Super Bowl only to spiral into mediocrity immediately afterwards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stew Posted February 17, 2006 Share Posted February 17, 2006 You know what they say about beggers and choosers. We have been bad for so long, I wouldnt mind a flash in the pan, quick Superbowl win. Then we could blow the "over the cap" team up and start from scratch with young cheap players. Gibbs would retire with another Superbowl under his belt and in our trophy case. Then Williams or Saunders would take the helm and we would be on a roll again. The only reasn we were bad for so long is because of the unstable coaching situation. We're good in that dept now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Tater Posted February 17, 2006 Share Posted February 17, 2006 I don't expect any big signings (though you have to go for opportunites that present themselves). I'm looking for depth. If we avoid the critical injury, we go to the SB (I've been watching SBs since 1973 and that's ALWAYS been a key if the team's good enough to get to the playoffs and is also one of the major differences between good teams and the also-rans). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
28!!28!! Posted February 17, 2006 Share Posted February 17, 2006 I agree that the current stable coaching situation is a key factor. . .I also have to say I'm a sucker for the "team" concept. . . I love that Gibbs goes after heart and character and I think the team chemistry the 'Skins have now would make the 2006 team even better than last yr with no roster changes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dirtyleft Posted February 17, 2006 Share Posted February 17, 2006 I have a question for everyone. If we did no large moves, and went into the season with the same basic team as this year, do we win more games or do we take a step back? I think, that if we do nothing, we will be a better team. Patten will be coming back (while that might not add much it is better that Taylor of Parris playing), Al Saunders is going to improve the O. Carlos Rogers will have a year under his belt and Harris can then move back to nickle. Plus, you can never stress enough what keeping a team together does for team cohesion. I feel that we are a passing game away from winning everything, and that can be fixed with grooming JC. While I would love to see a big name come to DC, I would like to see the Redskins win with true Redskins players, not outsiders who finally decided to come to DC just because we are starting to get good. I want to win with the players who have helped turn this ship around. There are always rookies that could add to the team. But hey, lets go out and get TO and be good for one year. That would be a hell of ride. NO WAY, WE DEFINITELY NEED ANOTHER TOP WIDE RECEIVER TO HELP OUR OFFENSE. SANTANA MOSS CAN'T CATCH IN DOUBLE COVERAGE. LIKE THE EVERYONE KNOWS HE NEEDS HELP, BUT I DO LIKE THE IDEA OF T.O. HE'S A GREAT RECIEVER. AL SAUNDERS MAY BE A GREAT OFFENSIVE SPECIALIST, BUT HE'S NOT EXICUTING THE PLAYS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RabidFan Posted February 17, 2006 Share Posted February 17, 2006 Save Parris! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaVarGreen2856 Posted February 17, 2006 Share Posted February 17, 2006 I share the same feelings. I would want to become a Patriots-like team. I don't want to bet the farm to win one Super Bowl only to spiral into mediocrity immediately afterwards. I get your point but I just want a Super Bowl... no matter how.... obviously it would be sweeter in the Patriots way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stew Posted February 17, 2006 Share Posted February 17, 2006 NO WAY, WE DEFINITELY NEED ANOTHER TOP WIDE RECEIVER TO HELP OUR OFFENSE. SANTANA MOSS CAN'T CATCH IN DOUBLE COVERAGE. LIKE THE EVERYONE KNOWS HE NEEDS HELP, BUT I DO LIKE THE IDEA OF T.O. HE'S A GREAT RECIEVER. AL SAUNDERS MAY BE A GREAT OFFENSIVE SPECIALIST, BUT HE'S NOT EXICUTING THE PLAYS. Ok, are you yelling at us? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the burgundy and gold Posted February 18, 2006 Share Posted February 18, 2006 NO WAY, WE DEFINITELY NEED ANOTHER TOP WIDE RECEIVER TO HELP OUR OFFENSE. SANTANA MOSS CAN'T CATCH IN DOUBLE COVERAGE. LIKE THE EVERYONE KNOWS HE NEEDS HELP, BUT I DO LIKE THE IDEA OF T.O. HE'S A GREAT RECIEVER. AL SAUNDERS MAY BE A GREAT OFFENSIVE SPECIALIST, BUT HE'S NOT EXICUTING THE PLAYS. Didn't pretty much everyone in the skins orginization tell you, they dont want T.O. and also why the caps? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.