Dirk Diggler Posted February 14, 2006 Share Posted February 14, 2006 We got nothing from Cambell last season. It was by design but we still received nothing from him. History shows that you will get close to nothing from a rookie WR. So the idea of getting nothing 2 seasons in a row from a high pick isn't something that tickles me. I'd prefer to get someone who can come in and play with that first pick - such as a DE (finally) DT or TE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greenhunter7 Posted February 14, 2006 Share Posted February 14, 2006 Derek Hagan=worse than Westbrook, that is a big hell no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinFan63 Posted February 14, 2006 Share Posted February 14, 2006 Derek Hagan Weaknesses: Does not have great pure speed...Is not a deep threat...Will still drop some catchable passes and hands are somewhat questionable...May have trouble separating from pro defensive backs...Is not a great blocker...Does not work the middle of the field much...May not have a lot of upside at the next level. Why would we want him? Hail!:point2sky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidwayMonster31 Posted February 14, 2006 Share Posted February 14, 2006 Definitely, D-Line. Tapp is the best choice. The pass rush was very good last year. Besides, you can get a decent receiver anywhere. The position is such a crapshoot, it's barely funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.