paredskinsfan Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 Its time to preach some truth around here for all you seahawks trolls!!! I dont want to hear anymore about how you are gonna pound us. Take a look see at the schedule we have endured to make the playoffs this year!! 4th hardest in the NFL. Now lets take a gander at those all mighty seahawks shall we. Let me begin by saying the seahawks had the easiest strength of schedule in the entire nfl you can check that stat at nfl.com and while you are over there checking that out also look at the rank of the run defenses they have played. That kinda makes alexandria the great well not look so great! Now lets take a look see at the seahawks playoff past. Well im sure you all know what that is. Maybe take a look at your superbowl trophy case .....oopsy goose egg there too huh. So please keep on giving us no credit but numbers do not lie Mark Brunell 3050 yds 23tds 10ints matt hasselback 3459 24 9 that is a push portis 1516 yds 11tds alexander 1880 yds 27tds slight advantage seahawks engram 778yds 3tds moss 1483yds 9tds advantage skins skins defense 9th in the nfl seahawks 17th advantage skins coaching staff well thats a no brainer! advantage skins SO THIS GAME WILL COME DOWN TO THE WIRE HOWEVER THE REDSKINS WILL EMERGE VICTORIOUS AND ONCE AGIAN SILENCE ALL THE DOUBTERS AND NEY SAYERS!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeBB15 Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 I could care less about past stats, I think the most reliable stat is who has the most passion and executes the most plays in the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsarethebest Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 amen! TOAST THE SEAHAWKS! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinned alive Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 let them talk. it'll just be that much better when they tuck tail and run after our victory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dead Money Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 portis 1516 yds 11tdsalexander 1880 yds 27tds slight advantage seahawks Sorry dude.. but you're a friggin homer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sknsrbck26 Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 People on this board who are not Redskin fans and act stupid in my opinion should be banned or lose the right to post!!!! But that's just me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fred Jones Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 All I can say is the more people from other teams come here and trash talk the better I feel about the game. Every week (except Arizona because they don't have any fans) people have come and talked trash and every week the skins have won. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paredskinsfan Posted January 12, 2006 Author Share Posted January 12, 2006 yes i am a homer but check the stat on run defenses the two teams have played and u will see why i only call this a slight advantage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daklu Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 I don't consider myself a troll as I try to have reasonable discussions instead of just posting to provoke people, and I'm certainly not ****y regarding the Seahawks, but I suppose I'll take a swing at some of these... Its time to preach some truth around here...Preaching truth? Well, there's some truth there certainly, but it appears to be selective truth.Mark Brunell 3050 yds 23tds 10intsmatt hasselback 3459 24 9 that is a push Hass - 7.7 yards per attempt, 65.5% comp, 98.2 rating Brunell - 6.7 yards per attempt, 57.7% comp, 85.9 rating Advantage Hawks engram 778yds 3tdsmoss 1483yds 9tds advantage skins Top 4 WR for each teamSeahawks - 188 catches, 2354 yards, 18 td Redskins - 191 catches, 2668 yards, 16 td In aggregate I'll call it even, but I like the Hawks depth better. skins defense 9th in the nflseahawks 17th advantage skins 9th in the NFL by which measure? Total yards allowed? That metric is garbage as far as ranking a team. Aikman's rating are better and have the Skins D and Hawks D tied at #6. Aikman does, however, mention the following: "In the last four weeks [of the regular season], it is the Redskins (94.0) who have the best defense in the NFL and their offense has a solid 85.7 rating, good for 7th in the NFL in that four-week span. That's a 4-Week Aikman combined rating of 179.7, second-best in the NFC in that span." Wow... second in the NFC over the past four weeks. That's really impressive and the Skins are peaking at the right time. Who's #1 over the past four weeks? "The Seahawks have actually played at a high level as well the last four weeks with a 180.2 4-Week combined..." Should be a barn-burner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmchairRedskin Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 Aikman does, however, mention the following: "In the last four weeks [of the regular season], it is the Redskins (94.0) who have the best defense in the NFL and their offense has a solid 85.7 rating, good for 7th in the NFL in that four-week span. That's a 4-Week Aikman combined rating of 179.7, second-best in the NFC in that span." Wow... second in the NFC over the past four weeks. That's really impressive and the Skins are peaking at the right time. Who's #1 over the past four weeks? "The Seahawks have actually played at a high level as well the last four weeks with a 180.2 4-Week combined..." Should be a barn-burner. Does that rating take in account the garbage teams that Seattle played over that span? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brown_Hornet Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 People on this board who are not Redskin fans and act stupid in my opinion should be banned or lose the right to post!!!! But that's just me! Virginia...V.A. You should be banned for stupidity. But that's just me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnyderShrugged Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 Virginia...V.A.You should be banned for stupidity. But that's just me. says the jackalope who has such a small piece of life that he trolls a board of a team he doesnt like, regardless of who is playing that week. Pathetic existence, man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brown_Hornet Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 says the jackalope who has such a small piece of life that he trolls a board of a team he doesnt like, regardless of who is playing that week.Pathetic existence, man Waaaaa, Pittman's a bad guy too, waaaaaa. Seattle fans are mean...waaaaaa How many posts do you have? Does the Pot thinketh the Kettle a different shade of Black? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monte51Coleman Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 Aikman does, however, mention the following:"In the last four weeks [of the regular season], it is the Redskins (94.0) who have the best defense in the NFL and their offense has a solid 85.7 rating, good for 7th in the NFL in that four-week span. That's a 4-Week Aikman combined rating of 179.7, second-best in the NFC in that span." Wow... second in the NFC over the past four weeks. That's really impressive and the Skins are peaking at the right time. Who's #1 over the past four weeks? "The Seahawks have actually played at a high level as well the last four weeks with a 180.2 4-Week combined..." Daklu- Are these Aikman rankings based on the last four weeks of the regular season? If so, wouldn't one be remiss to leave out the following? Seattle's last 4 opponents- San Fran (4-12), Tenn (4-12), Indy (14-2), GB (4-12) combined w/l record- 26-38, combined winning percentage- .406 Washington's last 4 opponents- Arz (5-11), Dallas (9-7), NYG (11-5), Philly (6-10) combined w/l record- 31-33, combined winning percentage- .484 I know, it's another strength of schedule argument. An argument that could include the fact that even the mediocre sum of the Seahawks schedule over the last four games is artificially pumped-up by including the Colts record. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mania Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 Actually the best statistic is who has the most points at the end of the game. Every other stat doesn't count for diddly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MustangSteve Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 Yea and if there not bad enough, our own trolls have to keep bringing there garbage on our site :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ant15fromNJ Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 I really dont know why they think they are going to kill us when we match up very well and not to mention we got Gibbs. The only reason I can think of is that hawks are home and they are 8-0 but we have a 6 game winning streak. It looks like to me it will be a close hard fought game that will be decided by turnovers and running the ball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neophyte Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 That's alright, they are getting tired of some of our trolls on their boards too. Some of us are just as rude or worse in their house than they are in ours. :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedDevil Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 We win bc Avg penis length: Skins fan - 12in Hawks fan - 2cm Yeah we win win bc of that... or bc we got laid Skins fan - last night Hawks fan - last year yup... thats why. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbooma Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 The only stat that matters is most of the seahawk fans were not alive the last time they won a playoff game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattGeorge85 Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 It's funny to me because people have been talking garbage all year and they keep on getting shut down. Where are the Dallas, Philly,and most of the NYG fans....waiting for next year. Part of the fun of having a successful team is talking it up. Compared to the three teams I just mentioned the Seattle fans have been fairly regular. It doesn't matter though they will be shut down just like the rest. :logo: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlinginSammy HOF '63 Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 At least the other teams' fans can bring it to an extent. They can almost piss me off but the 'hag fans trolls just make me laugh. It's like watching a home schooled 10 yr old mormon trying to trashtalk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinthemboys Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 Actually the best statistic is who has the most points at the end of the game. Every other stat doesn't count for diddly. Amen to that. I also believe this game will come down to the team who wants it more. I believe the redskins want it more. I also feel like their team is being a little ****y/overconfident. I did not expect to see that. Our team has responded well to our oponnents overconfidence. I am very pumped about our defense, and I bet after the first quarter that seed of doubt will be firmly embedded into quest field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Large_Ant Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 At the risk of being called a "troll" for talking about football (unless the definition of troll is someone who has a different opinion than yours) I can't understand for the life of me why you guys keep bringing up the strength of schedule argument. It's lame for anyone in the NFC East to bring up and you guys don't even realize it. Over the course of the season, including the game against us, slightly more than half of our games have been played against common opponents. We've played the same people. Thrown in their amongst them, you guys got a couple that were decent and so did we. We beat all of the bad teams and the only "good" teams we lost to were the Jaguars (soundly) and you guys (barely). While you guys beat the Bears in Kyle Orton's debut (barely), you lost to the lowly Raiders... at home. Have you guys really convinced yourself that you've had some hard road? If you look at strength of schedule (as in the immovable thing that the NFL sets before the season), we certainly had the weaker one. But when you talk about strength of victory (as in who you actually beat), even the casual observer can see that the two teams are pretty even. It's as if you guys are trying to get some special credit just for hard teams being on your schedule, even when you lost. On any given Sunday, a weaker team can beat a better team if the right circumstances come together. The Raider game should have taught you guys that. But here you are at the end of the season trying to forget that game existed and extoll how another team had it easier than you. All a good team can do to prove themselves against a weaker team is win. The Seahawks did that. Your point on the schedule would have made sense if they had lost to some of those crummy teams. In most cases, they beat them soundly but in all cases, they beat them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Large_Ant Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 Amen to that. I also believe this game will come down to the team who wants it more. I believe the redskins want it more. I also feel like their team is being a little ****y/overconfident. I did not expect to see that. Our team has responded well to our oponnents overconfidence. I am very pumped about our defense, and I bet after the first quarter that seed of doubt will be firmly embedded into quest field.Why do you feel like the Seahawks are being over confident? The fans maybe but the team? Hmmm... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.