Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins

Hill chill: Dems chafe under Pelosi


Fred Jones

Recommended Posts

Hill chill: Dems chafe under Pelosi

BY ROBERT NOVAK SUN-TIMES COLUMNIST

http://www.suntimes.com/output/novak/cst-edt-novak05.html

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi had just finished a typically discursive floor speech shortly before the year-end adjournment when a very liberal member aproached her second-in-command, Minority Whip Steny Hoyer, and whispered in his ear: ''Steny, is it not time for a coup?''

It obviously was not time to oust Pelosi and replace her with Hoyer. House Democrats do not get rid of their leaders with coups, as Republicans have during the last half-century. Nevertheless, dissatisfaction with Pelosi's performance is pervasive across the ideological spectrum. Her colleagues grumble that under her leadership, the party lacks focus and a clear agenda necessary to take advantage of Republican disarray.

This deficiency is referred to by some House Democrats as ''the Nancy problem,'' but it really transcends failings of their party leader. They remain tied to obsolete practices that freeze in place aged committee leaders. Their rhetoric betrays inability to free themselves from New Deal tax-and-spend policies. The Republican majority looks divided, out of gas and threatened by serious scandals. But Democrats fear they are ill-equipped to seize their opportunity.

The Democratic Caucus vote that propelled Pelosi to power was cast Oct. 10, 2001, when Pelosi defeated Hoyer for party whip, 118-95. But the authenticity of that outcome always has been questioned inside the caucus because of the exaggerated influence by Pelosi's fellow Californians. Thirty of the outsized California delegation's 31 Democrats voted for Pelosi, some reluctantly. Minus them, Hoyer had a clear edge over Pelosi of 95-88.

Many Democrats inside and outside of Congress see the wrong person elevated as their House leader by accident of geography. It is hard to deny that Hoyer surpasses Pelosi in backroom strategy sessions, in floor debate or in television interviews. The man from southern Maryland seems a better voice for a party trying to expand its base than the woman from San Francisco.

Today's gap between minority leader and minority whip is wide and visible. Hoyer is no conservative and delivers the partisan stemwinders expected of a party leader. But he also is unapologetically pro-business and pro-national defense, while Pelosi consistently runs in the opposite direction. Hoyer voted to go to war and for bankruptcy reform, while Pelosi was against both.

When Rep. John Murtha in effect called for immediate U.S. military withdrawal from Iraq, Pelosi in the secrecy of the party caucus embraced that dangerous political course. After two weeks of internal debate, Pelosi backed down to Hoyer's position of effectively letting the House members individually pick their own way.

It is not ideology, however, that makes many Democrats yearn for Hoyer. The congressman who whispered about a coup in Hoyer's ear is much closer to Pelosi ideologically. He and other Democrats are simply appalled by Pelosi's image as a party leader.

Pelosi neither sets an agenda nor offers inspiring messages, but she cannot be held wholly responsible for the superficial quality of Democratic rhetoric from the House floor. Debate on bills ordinarily is led by the senior committee member, who is bound by cliches and stereotypes. One of the best and longest lasting of Newt Gingrich's reforms when he became House speaker in 1995 was to institute term limits for Republican committee heads. The Democrats keep their leaders as long as they live.

The Democratic management of legislation in the House is handled by John Dingell, 79, Energy and Commerce Committee (25 terms); Tom Lantos, 77, International Relations (13 terms); John Conyers, 76, Judiciary (21 terms); David Obey, 67, Appropriations (18 terms); and John Spratt, 63, Budget (12 terms). These are men who generally talk about moving the previous question more than moving the nation.

The combination of such senior citizens and the 65-year-old Pelosi produce a mind-numbing product that is not calculated to take advantage of an unpopular war and a climate of scandal. Pelosi is reported fearful that if Democrats do not finally regain control of the House this year, she may be replaced by Hoyer. There are House Democrats who feel that change ought to come sooner to prevent another election defeat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love the Dem leaders. As long as Pelosi, Dean, Kennedy, Reid et al are the face of the party, they dont have a chance.

When they wise up and use leaders like Lieberman, Ford, Bayh, Mark Warner, Bill Richardson, then they have a chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know that many here like to characterize Pelosi as the Antichrist, but she is actually a good, smart, conscientious person who loves her country.

She is not, however, the appropriate person to be leading the Democrats in the House. Novak is absolutely right in everything he says in this column.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love the Repub leaders. As long as Bush, Delay, Dick, Santorum, Abramoff et al are the face of the party, they dont have a chance.

All evidence to the contrary of course.

BTW, you better tell that GOPer Patrick Kennedy that his dealing with Abramoff are under scrutiny. 120K is hard to ignore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love the Repub leaders. As long as Bush, Delay, Dick, Santorum, Abramoff et al are the face of the party, they dont have a chance.

Nah, you got it wrong. This leadership explains why the Republicans have to be the party of the religious right because with these guys in charge of the country you best start praying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nah, you got it wrong. This leadership explains why the Republicans have to be the party of the religious right because with these guys in charge of the country you best start praying.

:laugh:

Let's face it, they're all pieces of ****. It's a matter of the lesser of two evils

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know that many here like to characterize Pelosi as the Antichrist, but she is actually a good, smart, conscientious person who loves her country.

She is not, however, the appropriate person to be leading the Democrats in the House. Novak is absolutely right in everything he says in this column.

Totally Agree...

If they don't put a less rhetoric person up there though......... % lost....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Gichin13
I know that many here like to characterize Pelosi as the Antichrist, but she is actually a good, smart, conscientious person who loves her country.

She is not, however, the appropriate person to be leading the Democrats in the House. Novak is absolutely right in everything he says in this column.

Fair statement for sure, as is Kilmer's right before this.

The sad part for the Dems is that between her and Dean, they have pissed away a huge amount of potential momentum over the last couple months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The sad part of this whole story is that Representatives in Congress do not represent the American population anymore. They represent views of high-dollar lobbyists period.

Both parties pander to big business, whether its Exxon-Mobile or Planned Parenthood.

No difference in my eyes as far as that goes.

You should base a Congressperson by the Bills they have created...

I agree, unfortunately the situation has become so bad that no one can pass a bill without compromise and consessions to someone else. Oh the bureacracy of it all!

By the way, my personal opinion of Nancy Pelosi is, when I see her on TV, I start yelling "Serenity now!, Serenity now!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...