SonnyRules Posted December 30, 2005 Share Posted December 30, 2005 What has Rivers proved at the NFL level...I'd rather have Patrick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bang Posted December 30, 2005 Share Posted December 30, 2005 Considering the thread began with the starter saying he was starting it to kill time while waiting for the game, I think it's a fine topic. Seems everyone is against the idea, as am I, but it may be we have to go for a #2 QB this offseason if Ramsey leaves.. remember Gibbs picking up Jeff Rutledge? He ended up being a very good backup while other younger QBs like Ryp groomed. ~Bang Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhead36 Posted December 30, 2005 Share Posted December 30, 2005 What is everyones obsession with Phillip Rivers??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smashmowf Posted December 30, 2005 Share Posted December 30, 2005 reminder..Last year we traded away this year's #1 and a few other picks to draft our QB. Why on earth would you want another one? Gibbs has won with EVERY QB he's ever had. EVERY ONE of them have played in a championship game, (Brunell hasn't for us yet, but the season ain't over.) Gibbs KNOWS his QBs. He told everyone Brunell could play when no one thought he could, and lookie lookie, turns out he was right when every so called expert had him and Brunell both buried as dinosaurs. I am willing to say Campbell will be the man, because so far Gibbs is batting 1000 with his QBs. ~Bang Dont forget about Jay, The Babe, and Stan the Man.....I feel what you are saying though... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CGSKINS Posted December 30, 2005 Share Posted December 30, 2005 Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D-Fence Posted December 30, 2005 Share Posted December 30, 2005 i think that if we trade lavar it should be for a d lineman, but one already under contract for a few years so we dont have to resign him as soon as we get him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sag Posted December 30, 2005 Share Posted December 30, 2005 Ok....seeing we're playing "what if..." The NY Post reported today, that the Jets are seriously thinking of not signing John Abraham to a Big, long term contract. Seems they're running scared after what has happened to Pennington since he signed that 64 Million deal. Sooooo...Abraham for Arrington, even up. I like Lavar, but if he's going, I could live with this scenario. I KNOW :doh: , there's 101 reasons why this won't happen, but I like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfbovey Posted December 30, 2005 Share Posted December 30, 2005 If Lavar is traded... I would hope for a pass rushing defensive end in his place. Second on the list would be a high draft pick. Third on the list would be a good WR. Another QB doesn't even come close to making the list. Wouldn't make sense at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-Prime Posted December 30, 2005 Share Posted December 30, 2005 One never knows.. we've been in situations before when an unknown QB that was a much later selection had to step into an emergeny situation, and Schroeder did OK.Gibbs knows QBs. He sees things in them that others can't, ie: Mark Brunell, Doug Williams, Mark Rypien, Jay Schroeder, Stan (the MAN) Humphries... that can be taken to the bank. The guy is a bona-fide GREAT coach, one of, if not THE best ever. It's not schemes and innovation that wins for Gibbs, it's his ability to lead men into battle, to command respect, and to instill pride and a sense of team among his players. Its his ability to get the most out of each and every player, and to place them in the situations they need to be successful. I have no doubt he has complete confidence in Campbell's future, and based on his track record, that is enough for me. ~Bang Uhhh huh huh huh he said bona huh huh huh BTW well put would have posted pretty much the same thing.. Thanks for saving me the time =) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3CardMonte Posted December 30, 2005 Share Posted December 30, 2005 Lavar For John Abraham even trade Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-Prime Posted December 30, 2005 Share Posted December 30, 2005 Lavar For John Abraham even trade I like Abraham the ball player.. I don't like Abraham the man.. I'd prefer a pick or two for Lavar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skeenzfan Posted December 30, 2005 Share Posted December 30, 2005 Brunell is the QB for this year or possibly next. Campbell was drafted in the first round to be the future. How can you bring in Rivers without seeing if Campbell can get the job done? Lavar is a good player but has has always been wrongly marketed as a great playmaker. Some of his routine plays are blown up to be great plays. His playmaking hype from college has carried over to the pros and his play has not matched the hype. I don't think that the redskins will miss him on the field as much as the fans will miss him. He is equivalent of a basketball player who can make a great highlight dunk but not enough game winning layups. Trying to take the edge off of waiting for Sunday 4pm, so lets play what if....-We send Lavar to SD for Rivers, and see if we can get a 2nd or 3rd for Ramsey? Let Brunnel run the O until he is done, and then Rivers and Campbell can fight it out to lead the team. -Use the pick from Ramsey to shore up the DLine or get a WR that will draw some coverage. -For the record I would rather see both of them stay on the team for years to come, but have to be realistic both want a new home next year. Go Skins, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinja Posted December 30, 2005 Share Posted December 30, 2005 no dice dude Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WVSkins79 Posted December 30, 2005 Share Posted December 30, 2005 Trading LaVar for Phillip Rivers. What a scary thought. Thank God it will never happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorPickSix Posted December 30, 2005 Share Posted December 30, 2005 Who would play LB then? Warrick Holdman? Pass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muzzah Posted December 30, 2005 Share Posted December 30, 2005 we dont need a 4th QB... JC is in the making, Brunell is the leader, and Ramsey is a great back-up at the moment. I think having Ramsey and JC sitting and watching how Brunell is running Joe's offense is a great learning experience for them. Mark is doing a great job and deserves more recognition than what everyone throws at him. If anything, I would trade him for a good Second Receiver (thats been proven) and a draft pick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MustangSteve Posted December 30, 2005 Share Posted December 30, 2005 :puke: So f*****g sick of these lets trade all our player threads when were the hottest team in football right now. :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest GibbSkins11 Posted December 30, 2005 Share Posted December 30, 2005 WHO CARES ??? BREAKING NEWS.......... REDSKINS AT EAGLES SUNDAY 4PM AM I MISSING SOMETHING,LOL:applause: :helmet: :applause: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest GibbSkins11 Posted December 30, 2005 Share Posted December 30, 2005 Trying to take the edge off of waiting for Sunday 4pm, so lets play what if....-We send Lavar to SD for Rivers, and see if we can get a 2nd or 3rd for Ramsey? Let Brunnel run the O until he is done, and then Rivers and Campbell can fight it out to lead the team. -Use the pick from Ramsey to shore up the DLine or get a WR that will draw some coverage. -For the record I would rather see both of them stay on the team for years to come, but have to be realistic both want a new home next year. Go Skins, im only concerned with sundays game but i have too ask.......... u do know gibbs hand picked a great qb in campbell , why would u trade a great player for rivers , unless u liked sonny vs billy :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tn_skin_fan_21 Posted December 30, 2005 Share Posted December 30, 2005 if we really do trade arrington (which i hope we dont) we dont need a qb.would be best to get a number 1 pick back or like a 2nd and 4th or sumin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lombardi's_kid_brother Posted December 30, 2005 Share Posted December 30, 2005 Trying to take the edge off of waiting for Sunday 4pm, so lets play what if....-We send Lavar to SD for Rivers, and see if we can get a 2nd or 3rd for Ramsey? Let Brunnel run the O until he is done, and then Rivers and Campbell can fight it out to lead the team. -Use the pick from Ramsey to shore up the DLine or get a WR that will draw some coverage. -For the record I would rather see both of them stay on the team for years to come, but have to be realistic both want a new home next year. Go Skins, It's smart to have 60 percent of the salary cap tied up in the QB position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnFoRcEr_uPu Posted December 30, 2005 Share Posted December 30, 2005 Simple answer to this...no. When Brunell is finally done(I'd say 2007), Campbell will be our QB from there on out. No question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gridironmike Posted December 30, 2005 Share Posted December 30, 2005 I would trade Lavar.......if I could get '91 Redskins defense in return. CRAP! Lets just keep Lavar and beat the feathers off of the Eagles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SHARPASAARROWHEAD Posted December 30, 2005 Share Posted December 30, 2005 OUT OF YOUR BLINKING MIND! It would come back to bite you in the ARSSSSSE! Never let a :logo: KILLER:logo: like him get away!:eaglesuck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.