Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins

Senate rejects reauthorization of Patriot Act


@SkinsGoldPants

Recommended Posts

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10485860/

Senate rejects reauthorization of Patriot Act

Failure of vote to pre-empt filibuster is major defeat for administration

BREAKING NEWS

The Associated Press

Updated: 1:06 p.m. ET Dec. 16, 2005

WASHINGTON - The U.S. Senate on Friday rejected attempts to reauthorize several provisions of the nation’s top anti-terror law as infringing too much on Americans’ privacy, dealing a major defeat to President Bush and Republican leaders.

In a crucial vote early Friday, the bill’s Senate supporters were not able to get the 60 votes needed to overcome a threatened filibuster by Sens. Russ Feingold, D-Wis., and Larry Craig, R-Idaho, and their allies. The final vote was 52-47.

Bush, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and GOP congressional leaders had lobbied fiercely to make most of the 16 expiring Patriot Act provisions permanent, and add new safeguards and expiration dates to the two most controversial parts: roving wiretaps and secret warrants for books, records and other items from businesses, hospitals and organizations such as libraries.

Feingold, Craig and other critics said that wasn’t enough, and have called for the law to be extended in its present form so they can continue to try and add more civil liberties safeguards. But Bush, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist and House Speaker Dennis Hastert have said they won’t accept a short-term extension of the law.

If a compromise is not reached, the 16 Patriot Act provisions expire on Dec. 31.

Frist changed his vote at the last moment after seeing the critics would win. He decided to vote with the prevailing side so he could call for a new vote at any time. He immediately objected to an offer of a short term extension from Democrats, saying the House won’t approve it and the president won’t sign it.

“We have more to fear from terrorism than we do from this Patriot Act,” Frist warned.

‘Vital tools’ in the war on terror

If the Patriot Act provisions expire, Republicans say they will place the blame on Democrats in next year’s midterm elections. “In the war on terror, we cannot afford to be without these vital tools for a single moment,” White House press secretary Scott McClellan said. “The time for Democrats to stop standing in the way has come.”

But the Patriot Act’s critics got a boost Friday from a New York Times report saying Bush authorized the National Security Agency to monitor the international phone calls and international e-mails of hundreds — perhaps thousands — of people inside the United States. Previously, the NSA typically limited its domestic surveillance to foreign embassies and missions and obtained court orders for such investigations.

“I don’t want to hear again from the attorney general or anyone on this floor that this government has shown it can be trusted to use the power we give it with restraint and care,” said Feingold, the only senator to vote against the Patriot Act in 2001.

“It is time to have some checks and balances in this country,” shouted Sen. Patrick Leahy, ranking Democrat on the Judiciary Committee. “We are more American for doing that.”

Most of the Patriot Act — which expanded the government’s surveillance and prosecutorial powers against suspected terrorists, their associates and financiers — was made permanent when Congress overwhelmingly passed it after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks on New York City and Washington. Making the rest of it permanent was a priority for both the Bush administration and Republican leaders on Capitol Hill before Congress adjourns for the year.

Compromise reached earlier

The House on Wednesday passed a House-Senate compromise bill to renew the Act that supporters say added significant safeguards to the law. These supporters predict doom and gloom if the Patriot Act’s critics win and the provisions expire.

“This is a defining moment. There are no more compromises to be made, no more extensions of time. The bill is what it is,” said Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz.

“Those that would give up essential liberties in pursuit in a little temporary security deserve neither liberty nor security,” said Sen. John Sununu, R-N.H. They suggested a short extension so negotiations could continue, but the Senate scrapped a Democratic-led effort to renew the USA Patriot Act for just three months before the vote began.

The bill’s opponents say the original act was rushed into law, and Congress should take more time now to make sure the rights of innocent Americans are safeguarded before making the expiring provisions permanent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tick tock tick tock

Boom!!!!!

But unfortunately it wont be one of those liberal cities out west being hit that would force people to wake up.

Liberals among others just dont understand the enemy they well we are facing they WILL wait years for an opening and pull of the spectacular Terrorist act here.

Not wishing it on another city but hopefully its not DC or NY this time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tick tock tick tock

Boom!!!!!

But unfortunately it wont be one of those liberal cities out west being hit that would force people to wake up.

Liberals among others just dont understand the enemy they well we are facing they WILL wait years for an opening and pull of the spectacular Terrorist act here.

Not wishing it on another city but hopefully its not DC or NY this time.

So you can't reauthorize the Patriot Act in its present form for a few more months while you work out the details? You have to make it permanent, right now, in this exact form, no discussion, or else Boom?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there a post by ND where he DOESN'T mention the "liberal boogyman"? I mean come on now, if it added something to the discussion it would be one thing, but all he does is try to paint people, yet he hasn't the slightest clue as to what they are actually thinking. I guess that's the whole "dumbing down" of America though :rolleyes:

As for this, yes they need to revamp it, or allow it to run out. . . which is a distinct possibility.

I think Sununu put it best though. . .

“Those that would give up essential liberties in pursuit in a little temporary security deserve neither liberty nor security,”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Follow-up:

Senate Passes Patriot Act Extension

By JESSE J. HOLLAND Associated Press Writer

The Associated Press

WASHINGTON Dec 21, 2005 — The Senate passed a six-month extension of the USA Patriot Act late Wednesday night, hoping to avoid the expiration of law enforcement powers deemed vital in the war on terror.

Approval came on a voice vote, and cleared the way for a final vote in the House.

Several provisions in the current law expire Dec. 31, and President Bush has called repeatedly for new legislation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Follow-up:

Senate Passes Patriot Act Extension

By JESSE J. HOLLAND Associated Press Writer

The Associated Press

WASHINGTON Dec 21, 2005 — The Senate passed a six-month extension of the USA Patriot Act late Wednesday night, hoping to avoid the expiration of law enforcement powers deemed vital in the war on terror.

Approval came on a voice vote, and cleared the way for a final vote in the House.

Several provisions in the current law expire Dec. 31, and President Bush has called repeatedly for new legislation.

Update #2 . . .

The passage is only for a month, and it will expire Feb 1st. Basically, it just gives them more time to hammer out the differences.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...