bulldog Posted November 28, 2005 Share Posted November 28, 2005 you look at the record and on the outside think this is a team stacked with talent and playmakers. but in the three games I have watched Seattle play this year they certainly looked far from being a well-oiled machine. is it Seattle or is the NFC just that bad in 2005? does anyone else agree that the top 4 teams in the AFC would kick the can out of anyone in the NFC? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The extremist Posted November 28, 2005 Share Posted November 28, 2005 i'll say it's the worst 9-2 defense I've seen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom [Giants fan] Posted November 28, 2005 Share Posted November 28, 2005 It should be the worst 8-3 team you've ever seen. I went from loving Feely to absolutely hating him in about a half hour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teller Posted November 28, 2005 Share Posted November 28, 2005 ']It should be the worst 8-3 team you've ever seen. I went from loving Feely to absolutely hating him in about a half hour. I think you guys will see them again Tom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MeNoRevs Posted November 28, 2005 Share Posted November 28, 2005 I guess being the worst 9-2 team is better then being the best 5-6 team ever Its true,with all those playmakers on offense and leading the NFL in Sacks, its amazing that they really dont blow decent teams out, instead of winning by the skin of thier teeth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Nostril Posted November 28, 2005 Share Posted November 28, 2005 Seattle is the wnd best team in the league after Indianaopolis. So, no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MeNoRevs Posted November 28, 2005 Share Posted November 28, 2005 Seattle is the wnd best team in the league after Indianaopolis. So, no. I probably put Denver at 2nd behind Indy, then Seattle. Only because Denver can run the ball with anyone in their backfield and have a better DLine then Seattle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bulldog Posted November 28, 2005 Author Share Posted November 28, 2005 you really think the Seahawks are better than Pittsburgh, Denver and Cincinnati right now? I don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Truant Posted November 28, 2005 Share Posted November 28, 2005 ']It should be the worst 8-3 team you've ever seen. I went from loving Feely to absolutely hating him in about a half hour. I think according to Shockey and Strahan, Seattle is 8-3 :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riad Posted November 28, 2005 Share Posted November 28, 2005 I think according to Shockey and Strahan, Seattle is 8-3:doh: Or 10-2, as of today. That was a good game. Here's a team that learned from its and others mistakes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bulldog Posted November 28, 2005 Author Share Posted November 28, 2005 well, the refs did their best to help the Giants I don't think EITHER of those touchdowns were actually touchdowns. Shockey never got his second foot down before the ball was dislodged on TD #1. I don't think on the second TD that Toomer's left foot came down completely in bounds, I think his heel clipped the backline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Nostril Posted November 28, 2005 Share Posted November 28, 2005 you really think the Seahawks are better than Pittsburgh, Denver and Cincinnati right now? I don't. I do. I think they're about even with cincinatti, but I give sea the slight edge. Indianapolis is going to expose Pitt, tomorrow night. However, I think Seattle has an excellent chance of beating the Colts. The Broncos barely beat the Cowboys and Redskins. They lost to the Giants. They aren't as good as advertised.(However, I do put them at #4 in the league) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsNeverDie Posted November 28, 2005 Share Posted November 28, 2005 ']It should be the worst 8-3 team you've ever seen. I went from loving Feely to absolutely hating him in about a half hour. You haven't seen nothin until you ride the rollarcoaster which is now known as the Washington Redskins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cowboyuptx Posted November 28, 2005 Share Posted November 28, 2005 you look at the record and on the outside think this is a team stacked with talent and playmakers. but in the three games I have watched Seattle play this year they certainly looked far from being a well-oiled machine. is it Seattle or is the NFC just that bad in 2005? does anyone else agree that the top 4 teams in the AFC would kick the can out of anyone in the NFC? We all know the Redskins cant beat AFC teams but that doesn't mean the Giants, Cows, and Hawks cant. IMO aside from Indy, there's no team in the AFC that looks at all unbeatable for the top NFC teams. SD beaten by Dallas, Denver beaten by NY, ect. ect. Statistically the AFC and NFC are dead even this season, 23 wins for the NFC - 23 wins for the AFC. Also both confrences each have 7 teams, with 7 wins or more. Both confrences also have one 6 win team but in the AFCE 6 wins puts you 2 games up, in the NFCN 6 wins leaves you 2 games behind. I think saying the AFC is automatically better than the NFC, is soooo 2004. This is 2005 and the balance of power (IMO) is obviously shifting back to the NFC. The NFC has already won more games this year against the AFC, than they did in all of 2004 (20). The AFC might have the best single team (Colts), but you could argue the NFC has as many (or more) good teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.