freakofthesouth Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 So it's late in the fourth, and we are driving. Mike Sellers just bulled his way past mid-field for us, and Joe Gibbs is methodically removing the hopes of any comeback that the Eagles were praying for. We faced a third-and-long when Gibbs called Patten's number. The play was executed, the protection outstanding, and the throw was brilliant. The catch was...non-existant. Patten whiffed an opportunity for the Skins to dominate this game. We would surely have put it in the endzone w/ the kind of drive and emotion we had, if Patten would have just kept both of his feet in bounds, a fundametal, chronically-practiced drill for every wide receiver in the NFL. It's situations such as this that make me concerned about the disappearance of our #2 receiver. Now that Moss has emerged, defenses are remedying our attack by rolling coverage to Moss. This leaves a major opportunity on the other side of the field for our X receiver. But yet, it isn't developing like that. Someone else needs to step up and play. This begs the question- when will Taylor Jacobs be ready to deliver? He has shown promise; maybe has has the Darnarien Syndrome (or Darkarien, if you are Steve Spurrier)- he can't practice well. Does anyone else on the board see the issue here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsNeverDie Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 Patten seriously needs to step it up...or soon i'm gonna wanna see more and more of Jacobs. You know...since i've only seen him catch like 5 balls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mookie0720 Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 Pretty much it's Chris Cooley. Then Mike Sellars. Then maybe Thrash. Then the guy who's supposed to be our #2, Patten. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsNeverDie Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 Pretty much it's Chris Cooley.Then Mike Sellars. Then maybe Thrash. Then the guy who's supposed to be our #2, Patten. Put Portis ahead of Patten...also... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnFoRcEr_uPu Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 Are we talking about the play that he got the PI call on? Because if so, that ball was under-thrown... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1ofDaFatBoys Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 i do. i like David patten. but it is coming a concern with me because moss is doing great and cooley is doing great. but to me it seems like sellers gets the ball more than patten. its like when patten's # is called he just isnt producing. maybe he's just in a slump and work his way out in the upcoming weeks. We need to do something HTTR!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiveStrongSkins Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 I think that he could play better and I think he will. Brunell has been on fire throwing to Moss and Cooley. Teams havent been able to stop them. You cant really blame him on that catch on the sideline. Thats a tough play to make definetly for a smaller wideout without the wingspan and long legs. You make it seem like Brunell put a perfect pass out there that allowed him to stop with both feet in bounds. Just because he isnt playing lights out right at the moment lets not throw him under a bus just yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freakofthesouth Posted November 8, 2005 Author Share Posted November 8, 2005 Are we talking about the play that he got the PI call on? Because if so, that ball was under-thrown... No, not that play. This was in the fourth quarter, and the Skins were in Eagle territory. Brunell made an amazing throw on the run right on the money to Patten. He made the catch, but only had one foot in bounds. Had the catch been made, it would have been a first down in the red-zone. Does that sound familiar? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onedrop Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 Put Portis ahead of Patten...also... amen, and Betts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freakofthesouth Posted November 8, 2005 Author Share Posted November 8, 2005 I think that he could play better and I think he will. Brunell has been on fire throwing to Moss and Cooley. Teams havent been able to stop them. You cant really blame him on that catch on the sideline. Thats a tough play to make definetly for a smaller wideout without the wingspan and long legs. You make it seem like Brunell put a perfect pass out there that allowed him to stop with both feet in bounds. Just because he isnt playing lights out right at the moment lets not throw him under a bus just yet. Nah, disagree w/ you here. I have watched that play a few times now, and he absolutely should have had both of his feet in bounds. Brunell put it right on the money. To be honest, I feel like Patten was surprised that the ball was as accurate as it was. And I am throwing him under the bus. Two weeks ago vs the Giants, we started to move the ball a bit and faced a similar third down situation. After Brunell made another on-the-money throw to Patten, he dropped a sure first down and a momentum change. Hey, I just wanna see the guy come through in clutch situations. He has made some great plays, particularly vs. San Fran. But he needs to take advantage of the matchups out there w/ Moss on the other side. And if he's not executing fundamental play, I will question his ability to do so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isifhan Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 Are we talking about the play that he got the PI call on? Because if so, that ball was under-thrown... Actually I don't think that pass was underthrown...Patten just kind of stopped running thinking that it was and tried to adjust and got pulled down...but where the ball ended up in the enzone was past where Patten was by a good 5-6 yards. I may have a faulty memory on that one though. I agree w/ FotN here a good bit though. He needs to talk less about how he is unhappy with his role and make more plays...the ball will then find him more if he actually catchs what is thrown to him. It's only the midpoint through the season though so he still has some time to come through. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiveStrongSkins Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 Nah, disagree w/ you here. I have watched that play a few times now, and he absolutely should have had both of his feet in bounds. Brunell put it right on the money.To be honest, I feel like Patten was surprised that the ball was as accurate as it was. And I am throwing him under the bus. Two weeks ago vs the Giants, we started to move the ball a bit and faced a similar third down situation. After Brunell made another on-the-money throw to Patten, he dropped a sure first down and a momentum change. Hey, I just wanna see the guy come through in clutch situations. He has made some great plays, particularly vs. San Fran. But he needs to take advantage of the matchups out there w/ Moss on the other side. And if he's not executing fundamental play, I will question his ability to do so. I understand your frustration, I really do. I just think he will have a good second half of the season and prove his worth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bat~man Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 whats sad is YOU KNOW moss is drawing double coverage and the best cover guys defenses have and patten is STILL not getting jack for stats , not number 2 or 3 or even 4 receiver stats ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HailYeah Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 He's wearing #47. And he's sick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freakofthesouth Posted November 8, 2005 Author Share Posted November 8, 2005 I understand your frustration, I really do. I just think he will have a good second half of the season and prove his worth. Ditto. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorPickSix Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 He was utilized properly in New England as the slot reciever mostly. We are giving him the opportunity to start, but he's just not stepping up. I hope we give Jacobs some more looks, otherwise we should draft a reciever in the 3rd (DE in the 2nd is a priority) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MumboSauce Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 I hope so...Patten has been a dissapointment(play on the field wise) thus far. No Taylor Jacobs either. Would be nice to have a productive #2. But for now it is Cooley. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moondog Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 He's wearing #47. And he's sick. i believe the term yer lookin for is "sik wit it" anyway ya patten needs to step it up big time he hasnt done hardly anything my suggestion: draft santonio holmes from ohio state if anyone has payed any attention to that guy he is absolutely amazing but in terms of short term solutions someone needs to light a fire under pattens a$$ or start thrash or jacobs but that formation with portis patten cooley and moss split out wide was amazing against the eagles im all for usin that a LOT more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grumpy Vet Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 I was really surprised at how often Mr. Cooley lined up as a wideout. He's really one of the most versatile guys around.....he lines up everywhere and puts his hands around anything even remotely close to him......even Redskin cheerleaders..... Patten has been a little underwhelming and I hope he can get in groove here pretty soon. I'd say the #2 wide receiver is Patten, although Thrash is knocking at the door. I'd say the #2 receiver is Cooley, Patten, Portis, Thrash, Sellers and Betts. Tyler Jenkins is a non-factor and is frustrating the crappola out of me. As we employ H-backs, I think we need to trade in our Tight Ends for some defensive linemen.....our TEs don't exist this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
portis&taylor Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 I know this is a long shot but if we could get reggie wayne we woudl be unstopable!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jnhay Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 Meh, this offense has been successful even with Patten not getting the stats, so I don't really mind. He's gotta be contributing somehow, or he wouldn't be the number 2. :bucsuck: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PapaDRoc Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 I believe Cooley is our #2 "receiver." He's on pace for 70 rec. and 800 yds. Not to mention he had better stats than Moss against Philly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ouvan59 Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 It could be worse. We could have last year's receiving crew. Laveraneus Coles: 41-449, 11.0 Rod Gardner: 8-72, 9.0 Darnerian McCants: 1-22, 22.0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raperry2 Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 Jacobs is on the bench Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
playoffsplz Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 Patten does have more experience but if your never going to throw to him EVER then why not have Jacobs in? makes no sense to me...i mean he is faster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.