The Oracle Posted October 10, 2005 Share Posted October 10, 2005 Couldn't have asked for it any other way. For those with TiVo, if you didn't see it review that and look for the LB's. MW, CC, and WH were each STACKED right behind each other on the left side. Coincidentally, the play came right at 'em. Chris Clemons and Warrick Holdman (I'll give MW a pass on this one), got their prostates ripped from themselves. If this ain't a reason to have LA in the game, I don't know what is. GW... What a stubborn ^%@@#(&!!!!! And for all those that don't want to see LA, I guess its better to play the players that know the play and get turnstyled than a player who (supposedly) doesn't know the playbook and makes plays.... All you guys that slurp GW and hate LA, don't worry... you'll have another chance this weekend against KC!!! Make all the excuses you want to right now as to why we got beat. Fact is they ran that ball right at those under-achieving personnel and "einstein" like schemes. Guess what... Denver won. He still won't play LA!!! GW = the dickhead camel (he's got deep reservoirs of stubborness and hate for LA). Just like I said last week, we won't win these two upcoming games (Denver = Loss, KC = Loss) if we're not playing LA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dirk Diggler Posted October 10, 2005 Share Posted October 10, 2005 Can one of the mods bounce this fool right off the board? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobzmuda Posted October 10, 2005 Share Posted October 10, 2005 What does this look like to you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLongshot Posted October 10, 2005 Share Posted October 10, 2005 Gdam! That Lavar must be able to be in all parts of the field at any time, and can miraculusly stop any play. Man, Williams must be an idiot by not letting him on the field. :doh: Jason Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinzRool Posted October 10, 2005 Share Posted October 10, 2005 Can one of the mods bounce this fool right off the board? Agreed. :banhim: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SonnyJ Posted October 10, 2005 Share Posted October 10, 2005 What does this look like to you? Yeah, I was wondering what the rules for blocking in the back are. Can you do it within like 5 yards of the LoS? As soon as it happened I turned to my brother and asked him. Neither of us knew the answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted October 10, 2005 Share Posted October 10, 2005 Williams was on the field? don't be an ass Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinzRool Posted October 10, 2005 Share Posted October 10, 2005 What does this look like to you? Great screen capture!!! Sure looks like a block in the back to me. Do you happen to have one of Jake's fumble? His arm was going back when he dropped it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieselPwr44 Posted October 10, 2005 Share Posted October 10, 2005 Putting your favorite player above the team?? Sounds about right for some around here. For an Oracle, your skills of prophecy suck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimster Posted October 10, 2005 Share Posted October 10, 2005 Great screen capture!!! Sure looks like a block in the back to me. Do you happen to have one of Jake's fumble? His arm was going back when he dropped it. yeah it does :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Displaced Fan Posted October 10, 2005 Share Posted October 10, 2005 That's "home field advantage" for 'ya. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Oracle Posted October 10, 2005 Author Share Posted October 10, 2005 What does this look like to you? ---- Looks like CC on the ground (typical), MW missing a tackle and WH on top of CC (priceless). You LA haters really need to invest in a DVR. BTW, I don't care about one player getting blocked in the back when you have two falling all over themselves. I'm starting to believe HTTR means HATER! What a bunch of clowns... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChampSkinsFanatic Posted October 10, 2005 Share Posted October 10, 2005 Couldn't have asked for it any other way. For those with TiVo, if you didn't see it review that and look for the LB's. MW, CC, and WH were each STACKED right behind each other on the left side. Coincidentally, the play came right at 'em. Chris Clemons and Warrick Holdman (I'll give MW a pass on this one), got their prostates ripped from themselves. If this ain't a reason to have LA in the game, I don't know what is. GW... What a stubborn ^%@@#(&!!!!! And for all those that don't want to see LA, I guess its better to play the players that know the play and get turnstyled than a player who (supposedly) doesn't know the playbook and makes plays.... All you guys that slurp GW and hate LA, don't worry... you'll have another chance this weekend against KC!!! Make all the excuses you want to right now as to why we got beat. Fact is they ran that ball right at those under-achieving personnel and "einstein" like schemes. Guess what... Denver won. He still won't play LA!!! GW = the dickhead camel (he's got deep reservoirs of stubborness and hate for LA). Just like I said last week, we won't win these two upcoming games (Denver = Loss, KC = Loss) if we're not playing LA. I just came off a 2 day banning for siding with Arrington, I agree with you but see you in 2 days:laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Oracle Posted October 10, 2005 Author Share Posted October 10, 2005 Putting your favorite player above the team?? Sounds about right for some around here.For an Oracle, your skills of prophecy suck. ------ Maybe I suck but I called this loss.... And yes, it was b/c LA wasn't on the field and CC and WH were getting turnstyled.... My fault, I just like to WIN!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sableholic Posted October 10, 2005 Share Posted October 10, 2005 block in the back? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobzmuda Posted October 10, 2005 Share Posted October 10, 2005 I don't care about one player getting blocked in the back k Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobzmuda Posted October 10, 2005 Share Posted October 10, 2005 block in the back? You got it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrockster21 Posted October 10, 2005 Share Posted October 10, 2005 What does this look like to you? Matt Bowen took a horrible angle on that play (starting to get familiar), and completley whiffed on the tackle. It should have been a block in the back, but at the same time Bowen should have mushed Bell. You can't help but think maybe he was worried about the horse collar rule? But if he took a good angle, he wouldn't have had to worry about that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChampSkinsFanatic Posted October 10, 2005 Share Posted October 10, 2005 Matt Bowen took a horrible angle on that play (starting to get familiar), and completley whiffed on the tackle. It should have been a block in the back, but at the same time Bowen should have mushed Bell. You can't help but think maybe he was worried about the horse collar rule? But if he took a good angle, he wouldn't have had to worry about that. Man I'll take a horse collar penelty over a TD anyday, it shouldnt have even been up to Bowen to make that tackle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieselPwr44 Posted October 10, 2005 Share Posted October 10, 2005 ------Maybe I suck but I called this loss.... And yes, it was b/c LA wasn't on the field and CC and WH were getting turnstyled.... My fault, I just like to WIN!!! No, you just want Lavar on the field no matter what the outcome. I'd like to see Lavar out there as long as he knows the defense and knows what's expected of him. When he shows that,he'll be out there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.