Tulane Skins Fan Posted September 16, 2005 Share Posted September 16, 2005 Brunell is only 6-17 in his last 23 starts. WTF? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheREALJBird Posted September 16, 2005 Share Posted September 16, 2005 who cares, that's the past, look forward to monday Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vnmenon1 Posted September 16, 2005 Share Posted September 16, 2005 Thats the truth.. We, as fans, can only hope for the better and support our QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted September 16, 2005 Share Posted September 16, 2005 What is Ramsey??... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phat Hog Posted September 16, 2005 Share Posted September 16, 2005 link please... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bulldog Posted September 16, 2005 Share Posted September 16, 2005 Think about the Jags after their 1999 run to the AFC Championship Game at 14-2. What did they do? They unloaded salaries and imploded due to the cap. The exodus of players out of Jacksonville included most of the big name players on the team outside of Fred Taylor and Jimmy Smith. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QBkilla56 Posted September 16, 2005 Share Posted September 16, 2005 That brunell is going to be the next Dan marino... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tulane Skins Fan Posted September 16, 2005 Author Share Posted September 16, 2005 6-17 is 6-17. and it doesnt seem like last year was when he started losing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E-Dog Night Posted September 16, 2005 Share Posted September 16, 2005 Jacksonville went through salary cap hell and they were pretty awful for a few years, which had nothing to do with Brunell. Last year was last year, and the conventional wisdom is that Brunell looks like a new QB compared to 2004. We'll know soon enough, and in any case, I wouldn't worry too much about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoony Posted September 16, 2005 Share Posted September 16, 2005 I heard on the radio that we are 7-0 when Portis runs for over 100. sounds right but I'm not positive (I haven't researched, sorry, too lazy) that's the stat I'm worried about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dawgjk9 Posted September 16, 2005 Share Posted September 16, 2005 i think that if we can get one or 2 nice passing plays for 10+ yards on the first series....we will then force them to respect the pass allowing portis to ruun all over them. if this all falls into place portis will have 100+ yards and the redskins (HOPEFULLY) will get outta the texas toiletbowl with a win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joncevensen Posted September 16, 2005 Share Posted September 16, 2005 Only way to go is up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Tater Posted September 16, 2005 Share Posted September 16, 2005 What is Ramsey??... Hasn't had 23 starts. 9 wins, 13 losses over 22 starts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Tater Posted September 16, 2005 Share Posted September 16, 2005 I heard on the radio that we are 7-0 when Portis runs for over 100. sounds right but I'm not positive (I haven't researched, sorry, too lazy) that's the stat I'm worried about. Over the last 17 games, we are undefeated when a back goes for over 100. Thing is, most of the times a back goes over 100, it simply occurs because the game flow allows you to call runs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoony Posted September 16, 2005 Share Posted September 16, 2005 Over the last 17 games, we are undefeated when a back goes for over 100. Thing is, most of the times a back goes over 100, it simply occurs because the game flow allows you to call runs. no doubt that stat has some chicken -vs- egg debate built into it... But a relevant stat nonetheless, especially considering how close most of our games have been. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CowboyBlog Posted September 17, 2005 Share Posted September 17, 2005 Over the last 17 games, we are undefeated when a back goes for over 100. Thing is, most of the times a back goes over 100, it simply occurs because the game flow allows you to call runs. That is a very good point. It also means you likely dont have "big play backs". Thats not a knock, it just means that running game is less likely to have backs that have the speed to break 50+ runs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B4L Posted September 17, 2005 Share Posted September 17, 2005 Brunell is only 6-17 in his last 23 starts. WTF? Does this surprise anyone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dreamshatterer Posted September 17, 2005 Share Posted September 17, 2005 Damnit! I can't wait for MNF to come around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted September 17, 2005 Share Posted September 17, 2005 a qb w/l record is a meaningless stat.... football is a TEAM game, a qb has zero control over defense & ST, and he can't catch the balls, or block, running game etc.......... I :laugh: every time someone uses that stat in an argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newarkredskinsfan Posted September 17, 2005 Share Posted September 17, 2005 Hw was on a team with no one around him, becouse they wanted him out. now we can only hope he turns it around Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrockster21 Posted September 17, 2005 Share Posted September 17, 2005 Hasn't had 23 starts. 9 wins, 13 losses over 22 starts. No, Ramsey has had 24 starts... http://www.nfl.com/players/playerpage/302216 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pR0JEkT 21 Posted September 17, 2005 Share Posted September 17, 2005 Thats the truth.. We, as fans, can only hope for the better and support our QB. True dat, I believe in the Redskins..we gonna kick their a$$ on monday night! (I hope) :thumbsup: There isnt a reason why we should not beat Dallas they are not that good..the funny thing is and I hate to say this no matter how bad the Boys are they always beat us they can go like 2 and 14 and those 2 wins will come against us and it just pisses me off!:cuss: Realistically they are not that good and we should beat them! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
panel Posted September 17, 2005 Share Posted September 17, 2005 a qb w/l record is a meaningless stat.... football is a TEAM game, a qb has zero control over defense & ST, and he can't catch the balls, or block, running game etc.......... I :laugh: every time someone uses that stat in an argument. It isn't completely meaningless, it should have been enough for Bufflo to start Flutie over Rob Johnson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.