Thiebear Posted September 12, 2005 Share Posted September 12, 2005 Just a 75k fine for the WWE neck slam? or will they apologize for then not giving the 1/2 the distance to around the 11? (as opposed to giving the bears the ball).... *My Prediction* - They do both... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsD Posted September 12, 2005 Share Posted September 12, 2005 Also add sending those refs back to high school games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
airborneskins Posted September 12, 2005 Share Posted September 12, 2005 Just a 75k fine for the WWE neck slam?or will they apologize for then not giving the 1/2 the distance to around the 11? (as opposed to giving the bears the ball).... *My Prediction* - They do both... Neither. Somehow the defender is gonna have been pushed into Ramsey, and it will be the QB's fault for getting his head chopped off. :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrockster21 Posted September 12, 2005 Share Posted September 12, 2005 Cowboy Fan: The hit on Ramsey was perfectly legal, just like every penalty called on the Skins in the past 5 years. I am devoid of all rational thought, but I just thought I would share my opinion on the subject. Skins are terrible. Their defense, #1 in the NFC last year and not looking any worse is terrible. Only Gregg Williams makes them good, not the actual talent. The Skins are terrible. The Cowboys beat a team minus their number 1 receiving threat by only 4 points in a squeaker, when it was obvious if Brees had had Gates around, the Turds would have lost by 3 TDs or more. But the Cowboys are much better than the Skins. No doubt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillyKilmer Posted September 12, 2005 Share Posted September 12, 2005 The NFL will do nothing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burgold Posted September 12, 2005 Share Posted September 12, 2005 No, we'll get an apology. For the last three years we have led the league in apologies from the league office. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor 36 Posted September 12, 2005 Share Posted September 12, 2005 I know, Burgold. It disgusts me how we always get shafted by the officials in games, and the league has the Redskins FO address bookmarked on their desktops because of how often they have to send apologies, but their "sorry, we blew it again" doesn't do anything to help us or rectify the problems with the officials. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bang Posted September 12, 2005 Share Posted September 12, 2005 Not only will we probably not get an apology, but this blatantly bad hit is being used on Sportscenter to hype up their idiotic Coors Light football song segment. I agree that it is football, but the rules are rules, and that hit is against the rules. For the refs to not call it is bad enough, but for the NFl to allow ESPN to glorify it is just bad form. As said before, if that had been Favre, not only would Briggs been flagged and fined, he likely would be tossed out of the game, and Sportscenter would be all over it with a decidedly different tone.. one has to wonder if they would show that play with the words "I..Love.. Animals bustin loose.." played over the top had it been any other QB. If every QB was allowed to be subjected to such hits, I wouldn't care. it IS football, and it IS a tough game.. but the fact is, the NFL has gone out of it's way to protect QBs,,, yet in this case they failed miserably. ~Bang Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
codeorama Posted September 12, 2005 Share Posted September 12, 2005 I posted this in another thread, I don't know if this is a factor or not but the guy that hit Ramsey was pushed into Ramsey by a Skins O lineman. Maybe that was a factor in the call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arrowhead Posted September 12, 2005 Share Posted September 12, 2005 Not only will we probably not get an apology, but this blatantly bad hit is being used on Sportscenter to hype up their idiotic Coors Light football song segment.I agree that it is football, but the rules are rules, and that hit is against the rules. For the refs to not call it is bad enough, but for the NFl to allow ESPN to glorify it is just bad form. As said before, if that had been Favre, not only would Briggs been flagged and fined, he likely would be tossed out of the game, and Sportscenter would be all over it with a decidedly different tone.. one has to wonder if they would show that play with the words "I..Love.. Animals bustin loose.." played over the top had it been any other QB. If every QB was allowed to be subjected to suc hits, I wouldn't care. it IS football, and it IS a tough game.. but the fact is, the NFL has gone out of it's way to protect QBs,,, yet in this case they failed miserably. ~Bang Well said Bang. I watched the game with two Charger fans & one Iggle fan and they all agreed that was an illegal hit. If I'm the Skins FO, I reject any apology from the NFL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dreamingwolf Posted September 12, 2005 Share Posted September 12, 2005 I posted this in another thread, I don't know if this is a factor or not but the guy that hit Ramsey was pushed into Ramsey by a Skins O lineman. Maybe that was a factor in the call. the commentators said that, and so did sports center up until bledsoe got barely hit in the head and they called the penalty. Then I noticed sports center started to change their tune saying the guy might get fined. Really think about it, even if the guy was pushed into him the guy knows he has him by the neck and proceeds to lay all his weight into it. I know it happends fast out there, but neck feels much different than chest the guy could have layed off a bit even if he was "pushed". My guess to what happend was earlier they called a roughing the passer on a hit to Ramsey, and after the fact the ref might have thought well it wasnt so bad maybe I made a mistake. Then saw Ramsey got hit high, thought at the time well I will let that one go to make up for it. Then later realized damn that guy took his head off, I really should have called that one. Lack of consistancy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Utah Posted September 12, 2005 Share Posted September 12, 2005 I am pretty sure that they will state that the hit was not intentional and that the fact that Jansen was hitting the guy put the defender in a position to be unable to control his body. IOW, he was blocked into the QB. Which of course was compounded by the fact that you teach blitzing backers to have their hands streched towards where you feel the ball will be or too keep a QB from stepping up from your blitz. While all things suck about the play, I don't think it was intentional nor really a penalty because of the fact that he was hit into Ramsey. Edit (I just need to watch the play again.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thewagen Posted September 12, 2005 Share Posted September 12, 2005 Not only will we probably not get an apology, but this blatantly bad hit is being used on Sportscenter to hype up their idiotic Coors Light football song segment.I agree that it is football, but the rules are rules, and that hit is against the rules. For the refs to not call it is bad enough, but for the NFl to allow ESPN to glorify it is just bad form. As said before, if that had been Favre, not only would Briggs been flagged and fined, he likely would be tossed out of the game, and Sportscenter would be all over it with a decidedly different tone.. one has to wonder if they would show that play with the words "I..Love.. Animals bustin loose.." played over the top had it been any other QB. If every QB was allowed to be subjected to such hits, I wouldn't care. it IS football, and it IS a tough game.. but the fact is, the NFL has gone out of it's way to protect QBs,,, yet in this case they failed miserably. ~Bang IT'll probably make the #1 "JACKED UP" hit tonight on the MNF pre-game! FS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
codeorama Posted September 12, 2005 Share Posted September 12, 2005 I am pretty sure that they will state that the hit was not intentional and that the fact that Jansen was hitting the guy put the defender in a position to be unable to control his body. IOW, he was blocked into the QB. Which of course was compounded by the fact that you teach blitzing backers to have their hands streched towards where you feel the ball will be or too keep a QB from stepping up from your blitz.While all things suck about the play, I don't think it was intentional nor really a penalty because of the fact that he was hit into Ramsey. Edit (I just need to watch the play again.) This is what I was trying to say. If you watch the tape, it looks like the guy might not have been able to hit ramsey at all, but was pushed right into him. My only question is if that matters, in terms of the rule book. I don't think it was an intentional clothesline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGreek1973 Posted September 12, 2005 Share Posted September 12, 2005 This is the type of calls the Redskins got all last year. Now imagine if the proper call was made, we would not have lost the ball, we would have had it at the 6 with a first down and goal. Don't know if we would have scored a TD but since Cooley scored in the play before (a got a another very questionable call) I say our chances would have been good with a field goal almost a certainty. Then in the end of the game you look at the score and say wow the skins offense sucks. Right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thewagen Posted September 12, 2005 Share Posted September 12, 2005 I am pretty sure that they will state that the hit was not intentional and that the fact that Jansen was hitting the guy put the defender in a position to be unable to control his body. IOW, he was blocked into the QB. Which of course was compounded by the fact that you teach blitzing backers to have their hands streched towards where you feel the ball will be or too keep a QB from stepping up from your blitz.While all things suck about the play, I don't think it was intentional nor really a penalty because of the fact that he was hit into Ramsey. Edit (I just need to watch the play again.) You need to watch it again then. It's one thing to be blocked into the situation, but the guy "finished" off the neck hit with a slam of Ramsey's head into the ground. If he had hit Ramsey's neck then showed some restraint as if to pull his arm back, then fine. But what he did after hitting the neck is what infuriates all 'Skins fans. WHat I would do if the 'Skins get a letter from the NFL is return it in a box full of cow SH_T, then tell them that GWilliams has been instructed that it is OPEN SEASON on QBs. H$ll, we're gonna get fined anyway for just looking mean, might as well take some opposing QBs down with us. It's getting quite comical the past few years to see these penalties cost the 'Skins crucial games. JUST WATCH, this was a setup game for scr_wing the 'Skins against the COWPUKES! Don't know how many times KeyshawnJ pushed off yesterday and didn't get called ONCE! FS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thiebear Posted September 12, 2005 Author Share Posted September 12, 2005 We got the hit on highlights here? I saw it 5-6 times and it looked like he "finished" the move as opposed to just pushing him backwards.. (pulls out the JFK film) Back and to the Ground... Back and to the Ground..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Utah Posted September 12, 2005 Share Posted September 12, 2005 You know, watching it again, I see Ramsey stepping up quick in the pocket, I see Jansen get a solid shot on the defender and redirecting him completely, not just a chip shot. I see the defender not having an ability to control himself with the shot. I hate seeing Ramsey hurt like that, but I also do not want to see the ability of a blitzing LB to be restricted because even if he is knocked upside down and his foot hits a QB in the head, its a penalty. In my eyes, the same thing happened here. It just looked mean as hell because its our QB and the defender didn't lose control of his body because hitting Ramsey kept him up. If that is something the league wants to adjust, I won't like it as a defensive coach, but I'll understand. Its just one more thing that the league will put in the hands of the officials and I don't like officials. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PCS Posted September 12, 2005 Share Posted September 12, 2005 "He's going to live. That was a penalty though." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
codeorama Posted September 12, 2005 Share Posted September 12, 2005 You know, watching it again, I see Ramsey stepping up quick in the pocket, I see Jansen get a solid shot on the defender and redirecting him completely, not just a chip shot. I see the defender not having an ability to control himself with the shot.I hate seeing Ramsey hurt like that, but I also do not want to see the ability of a blitzing LB to be restricted because even if he is knocked upside down and his foot hits a QB in the head, its a penalty. In my eyes, the same thing happened here. It just looked mean as hell because its our QB and the defender didn't lose control of his body because hitting Ramsey kept him up. If that is something the league wants to adjust, I won't like it as a defensive coach, but I'll understand. Its just one more thing that the league will put in the hands of the officials and I don't like officials. Totally agree. Sucks that Ramsey got hurt, but it wasn't an intentional clothesline. There were other factors involved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGreek1973 Posted September 12, 2005 Share Posted September 12, 2005 This is the type of calls the Redskins got all last year. Now imagine if the proper call was made, we would not have lost the ball, we would have had it at the 6 with a first down and goal. Don't know if we would have scored a TD but since Cooley scored in the play before (a got a another very questionable call) I say our chances would have been good with a field goal almost a certainty. Then in the end of the game you look at the score and say wow the skins offense sucks. Right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfitzo53 Posted September 12, 2005 Share Posted September 12, 2005 I posted this in another thread, I don't know if this is a factor or not but the guy that hit Ramsey was pushed into Ramsey by a Skins O lineman. Maybe that was a factor in the call. Maybe it was a factor, but generally refs are careful enough around quarterbacks that intentions don't come into play unless the defender made every attempt to avoid contact. In the Bills game this week Lawyer Milloy got called for hitting a sliding QB even though he took off while the QB was standing and turned his shoulders away once he saw him go down. He did the best he could to avoid nailing him and still got flagged. With the passer in the pocket they're generally even more protective, and if you hit the quarterback in the face you're going to get penalized 90% of the time. When Lance Briggs has his arms flailing like that I can't call it accidental. He may have been pushed, but don't tell me his blocker forced him to hold his hands in Ramsey's face. Also, Patrick Ramsey's a sizeable guy. It's tough to slam a man like that down by the neck unless you mean to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wskin44 Posted September 12, 2005 Share Posted September 12, 2005 I am pretty sure that they will state that the hit was not intentional and that the fact that Jansen was hitting the guy put the defender in a position to be unable to control his body. IOW, he was blocked into the QB. Which of course was compounded by the fact that you teach blitzing backers to have their hands streched towards where you feel the ball will be or too keep a QB from stepping up from your blitz.While all things suck about the play, I don't think it was intentional nor really a penalty because of the fact that he was hit into Ramsey. Edit (I just need to watch the play again.) Utah, when you watch the play again check this out: The defenders right arm is straight out and he is leaping in the air trying to engulf PR just as Jansen hits him. The hit does send the d's arm toward PR's head and the arm slips under PR's face mask. But now watch frame by frame the rest of the play. The d's body ends up behind PR and rather than keep his arm straight and try to withdraw it from PR's neck he crooks his arm around PR's neck to get better leverage and pulls PR down from behind forcefully by the neck. PR's head slams into the defender's body at a sick angle and only when the defender sees that PR is down and the ball is lose does he let go of PR's neck. Although it can be said that his arm got in PR's neck by accident, what the defender did after that was not an accident. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terpfan44 Posted September 12, 2005 Share Posted September 12, 2005 Cowboy Fan: The hit on Ramsey was perfectly legal, just like every penalty called on the Skins in the past 5 years. I am devoid of all rational thought, but I just thought I would share my opinion on the subject. Skins are terrible. Their defense, #1 in the NFC last year and not looking any worse is terrible. Only Gregg Williams makes them good, not the actual talent. The Skins are terrible. The Cowboys beat a team minus their number 1 receiving threat by only 4 points in a squeaker, when it was obvious if Brees had had Gates around, the Turds would have lost by 3 TDs or more. But the Cowboys are much better than the Skins. No doubt. w/o cortez's..tackles..and parcells getting those same calls..big d looks just like the 6-10 joke they were in '04... I guess we'll see d'marcus ware preseason film-file until he goes to Canton.. shameless hype Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Underwater Ally Posted September 12, 2005 Share Posted September 12, 2005 So the defender didn't mean to hit Ramsey? The guy was trying to avoid hitting Ramsey and the big mean O-lineman pushed him into the quarterback who he was desperately trying to avoid? :doh: The hit was a clothesline. In order to execute this kind of hit, you need to willfully extend your arm and make contact with the victim's shoulders, neck, or and head. That is what the defender did, and that is what caused Ramsey to go down. The defender was not pushed into Ramsey. And there will be at least a fine, and likely an apology. The league specifically made these rule to avoid injury to the quarterback. When a quarterback is injured and no penalty is called, that is inexcusable. The league will see a need to send a message to the entire NFL that these plays are unacceptable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.