ok and? I was simply making the point Guice isn't a slow back as was described and compared with Perine. Am I declaring Guice to be the second coming of anything? No. Would I take him in the top 10 much less top 5 like Richardson? no. Again, that wasn't my point.
Perine was timed running the 40 in 4.65s whereas Guice was timed at 4.49s to say Guice is a slow RB is a bit off. Pretty sure a lot of people consider him the 2nd best RB in this draft and expect him to be superior to Perine