Acworth skins fan

6 minutes ago, skinsmarydu said:

I've been a fan for 46 years, I always want a win.

High draft picks aren't always good picks, as our FO has proven. (Just sayin'.)

Good morning, I agree, as a fan of 50 years I never want to lose. Higher pick be dammed. 

16 hours ago, Vanguard said:

It would be awful for Scherff to say publicly he wanted a trade if thats the case.  Could you imagine?  A second pro bowler saying they didn’t want to be here.

Pro bowls don’t mean anything to me. 1/3 of the voting are fans. More of a popularity contest imo. 

Just now, carex said:

 

what's wrong with runs

A few more than 12 passes might have helped. 

1 minute ago, BoycottEuphemisticFans said:

that would be me.  i'm great.  despite my haters.  they don't know anything.  they can't even add, subtract or multiply yet.

Thanks again, but a little conceited?

Thanks to who ever it was that mentioned top streams. Can’t believe I watched three hours of run run run. 

Gives me no joy to see Gruden go, but things need a change. 

It’s also written about on the nfl.com.  No details, and I don’t know how to show a link. 

DH is not ready. I didn’t like the pic at 15, as he only started for one year with Ohio State, thought second round. I think he has lots of potential, but at the moment, Gruden will most likely go with Colt if healthy. 

10 minutes ago, ConnSKINS26 said:

Guys, please put this douchebag on "ignore" and stop quoting him. Lets do one good thing today for each other, please. 

Do not know how. 

8 minutes ago, ntotoro said:

I don’t know if the Estate Tax came before or after JKC’s death (you really should be cursing Ted Kennedy for this), but you can’t just will a team. John KC would have had to pay a HUGE tax on the difference between what his dad paid for the team and the value at that time. I think 28%... ? If you can’t afford that, that’s when outside investors (or even a group led by him) can come in and take it.

The tax on the team would have been almost 50%. And some one wishing that JKC is in hell is downright pathetic. 

I don’t understand the love for Callahan here. What has he done as a redskin coach that people think makes him great. Haven’t seen a hole that running backs can get through. 

4 hours ago, TD_washingtonredskins said:

 

Well, I don't know for sure that it's "right" but I'm closer to not giving an already-well-paid-but-declining player more money than I am giving him a raise. He's made some good money, so it's incumbent on the team to pay him for what they believe they'll get out of him from here on out, not reward him (more) for what he's already accomplished. 

Thanks for the reply. In my opinion, if it’s the money, I’d consider making his last two years guaranteed money. Also draft his replacement next year. Anything else trade if possible. 

1 minute ago, TD_washingtonredskins said:

 

I don't think that's the easy solution at all! To put the situation to rest, maybe. To do the right thing, probably not. 

Yeah something not about donuts. 

Curious what’s the right thing in your opinion?

On 6/28/2019 at 12:15 PM, goskins10 said:

 

Sorry, didn't read back. Read like it was a statement not a question of another. I typically try to read back to understand context. As soon as I do not I should have....    

All good my friend

2 hours ago, goskins10 said:

 

He was not. All players can get a second, third or more opinions, and often do. Any report that says he was limited to Redskins doctors is false. 

 

Now he may have trusted them and decided not to seek outside opinions and now wished he had. But players cannot be stopped from seeing their own doctors. 

Thanks, but I knew that. Was replying to a previous post.

16 hours ago, Malapropismic Depository said:

 

Although, if we learned anything from TW situation, he may be confined to seeing the Redskins' doctors.

Would like to know how TW was only allowed to see the Redskin medical staff. Link?

7 hours ago, Califan007 said:

You know what I love about this thread?...I can remove myself from it for weeks on end, and when I return not one single fact has been added to the discussion lol...there's no catching up to do. It's like I never left.

Nothing but posters stating conjecture 

15 hours ago, goskins10 said:

 

No extension is a bit too absolute. It depends on what he wants. Say what he wants is the next two years guaranteed and then the team wants to ad two more yrs not guaranteed to keep control of his rights then that would be fine. If he is looking for what amounts to the next 3 to 5 yrs guaranteed then I agree, Have to let him go. And by let him go, I mean call his bluff and see if he sits out for two yrs not playing and not getting paid. Or once he gets to camp try to trade him. Or try to trade him next off-season. 

 

 

This I believe could be exactly what Trent wants, of course all speculative on my part. The next two years guaranteed. I believe he may retire after the 2 years are over, and the possibility of a work stoppage with the contract talks possible coming, I wouldn’t mind giving him this guarantee. 

This annoys me. You sign a contact, you fulfill your contract. Just another reason sports are not as important to me as they once were. 

On 4/27/2019 at 9:43 AM, bakedtater1 said:

What is harrumph?

Watch Blazing Saddles. 

Sorry, didn’t see it posted earlier 

Good pick for the lions

Yeah

What would T Taylor cost? Not long term , but think better than Colt. 

2 minutes ago, DJD2 said:

 

Pretty sure he's a widower.

Looking it up, believe your right. He did have a young ladie girlfriend that was born in 79 though

So the Cheatriots owner got caught cheating on his wife