Skins199021

Haskins needs an O-line at least for now (I mean we always want one, but we need a very good one). For now he is still very slow processing what is happening and it let to a lot sacks and late throws. Now getting a whole offseason under his belt as the guy should help with the processing aspect, the other thing he needs to work on is accuracy/anticipation. In his 7 starts he had a 59% completion percentage which is terrible in today's NFL. For reference, Kyler Murray was over 64% this year, and he had an unbelievably bad offensive line. And Daniel Jones was at 62%. Haskins definitely has to improve here

Just asking. Say we Traded number 2 and Miami gave us 5, and 18 and other picks, but for the sake of this we know we have 5, and 18 and +. How if our draft started with Epenesa/Okudah at 5 and Delpit at 18. How are we feeling after Day 1?

There is no way of knowing that. You are operating under false pretenses if you believe Young is a sure thing as opposed to guys you pick at 5,18, and 39 (in a hypothetical scenario) Would you not trade a $100 bill for three $50 bills? That is almost the logic you are using except in this case we don't know if the $100 bill really is a $100 or if the $50 bills are really $50. Considering we have major weaknesses other than our front 4 on defense. If we ended up with 5,18, and 39 and took AJ Epenesa, Delpit, and Queen. You still end up with a stud DE, a very good Safety prospect, and an LB that can be very productive for us on Day 1. If Miami throws in a 2021 2nd that is icing on the cake and draft ammo in the next year. That sound better to me drafting Young and then hoping our LB corp, 2nd corner, and 2nd safety somehow aren't awful. If those are our 1st three picks and you take a WR like Edwards in the 3rd, and you can use all of our cap space on the O-line in FA (Resigning Flowers and Scherff, restructure Trent, maybe even sign Conklin. Dallas trade away and actual proven generational talent at the NFL level, and it brought them a dynasty. Its silly to ignore the value of a trade back

I like Olson but we have to be smart. I'd do a 2 year deal at 5 million per (At Most), and I'd take a TE in round 3/4 this year. Olson can be counted on for 500 yards and 4-6 TDs still but we cannot overpay for him, and not have developmental depth behind him

5, 18, 39, and a 2021 2nd from Miami definitely does it for me. I probably even do it without the 2021 pick.

Anyone pretending to have the redskins FA board is just false. No team would create a real FA board and leak it.

Edwards is fast, not sure who you were watching. Definitely faster than Harmon. SC had Edwards returning Punts, he isn't a slow receiver. Not quite Deebo fast but, he is fast.

Honestly he is very underrated, he is a faster but less physical Alshon Jeffery. Productive SC WRs have somewhat remained that way in the NFL. Rice, Jeffery, Deebo, Pharoh Cooper to an extend. Edwards would be a perfect two to match up with Mclaurin.

In the end though what do these numbers mean for the NFL? Clowney was getting triple teamed without a legit side kick on the other end his senior year, plus he was dealing with injuries. JJ Watt didn't have the college numbers, this doesn't mean we project Young to be better than Watt. My overall point here is if we are being offered multiple top 50 picks between 2020 and 2021, you have to legitimately think about doing so. Especially a team in our position with multiple needs and no 2nd round pick. The notion of you don't trade this pick for anything is actually quite ignorant and blind to value (not saying this is your view, just generally speaking).

You are having recency bias, how about Clowney, the Bosas. Extremely high end DEs come out all of the time, and if Young is better than Clowney coming out, you could barely make that argument at best. Again I won't be mad if we get him, but I am not blinded by him to the potential value of a trade back

Okudah and Delprit and a 2nd is >> than Chase Young on paper. Unless you operate under the false assumption that Young can't bust but the others will. 5, 18, and 39 and a 2021 2nd does it for me Titans Traded number 1 overall for 8, 43, 45, and 76 in the same draft, and then a 1st and a 3rd in the following draft. This turned into Conklin, Corey Davis, Derrick Henry, and Jonnu Smith Two points here. I rather have 18, and 39 this year. Then the two later 2nds, a 3rd and first the following year. 2nd point is look who that turned into, I wouldn't trade all of that for just Chase Young or any player really. People need to stop valuing one player over multiple possible good players. Myles Garrett was just as good of a prospect as Young... he didn't just change the Browns into a winner. We were a bad team with multiple needs and DE is really one of them. I won't be mad if we take Young, but trading down as to be considered for a good offerr\.

ahh yeah Okudah, that would probably be the pick, very good combo here as well. If this was the outcome I am going big on O-line, ILB, and TE in FA

Say Miami Trades, 5, 18, 39 and a 2021 2nd or 3rd. Say the Giants take Simmons at 4. Who would you take in that scenario? 5. Jeudy WR 18. Diggs CB 39. Isaiah Wilson OT Perhaps something like that? Jeudy/McLaurin would be great to watch and Haskins would have no excuses. Also an OT to make moses expendable. Diggs give the secondary a young shot in the arm

I don't buy this at all, wouldn't make any sense Stafford has at least 5 good years left, at the least

More of a off the beaten path scenario here. Say we trade with Miami and get 5, 18 and 39 Sign: Yannick Ngakoue - DE Austin Hooper - TE Ronald Darby - CB (Depth, young, still an interesting talent) DJ Humphries - to play RT Resign: Sherff Trent Flowers Cut: Norman Richardson Reed Moses, Kerrigan Draft: Jeudy, Delpit, and Patrick Queen at 5, 18 and 39 (I think Simmons goes to NY to be honest) No idea if we have the cap space to do all that, but I'd like to watch a McLaurin, Jeudy, and Hooper offense