Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins
Forum Rules and Guidelines

RedskinsInFebruary

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    1,999

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by RedskinsInFebruary

  1. RedskinsInFebruary
    Donald? Neither fined nor involved.
  2. RedskinsInFebruary
    HAIL yeah!
  3. RedskinsInFebruary
    Just signed in to remind everyone that, yeah even though the Cowboys are actually good this year, Cowboys fans are the equivalent of Justin Bieber fans in the football world. Mostly football-free marketing victims.
  4. RedskinsInFebruary
    It's disgusting because their fans deserve to have experienced the Cowboys in the rebuilding basement for a few years. It makes no sense to me how they seem to keep lucking out on players and the Redskins can't ever seem to turn the corner.
  5. RedskinsInFebruary
    What a self-limiting idea. The last thing anyone should do is erect bars around themselves.
  6. RedskinsInFebruary
    I like the gold pants but too bad they've stunk it up in them. Bad association now....
  7. RedskinsInFebruary
    Ha, no gaping holes except for the ones pass rushers run through.
  8. RedskinsInFebruary
    ...but they should have.
  9. RedskinsInFebruary
    Good grief, how ridiculous. In 2nd grade kids are taught about HOMONYMS. Guess the "journalists" at CBS didn't make it that far in school.
  10. RedskinsInFebruary
    Thanks to you and this post I got to see the game.
  11. RedskinsInFebruary
    Can't believe how well this works. Thank you!!!
  12. RedskinsInFebruary
    Correct. I think a few teams wore white at home back then: I know the LA Rams did, Cowboys, and I think the Colts also....
  13. RedskinsInFebruary
    Great point. I'd like to add the same word can have several different meanings, senses, and usages. Obviously in the case of the Redskins it's not a slur in any way, shape, or form. Since it's not a slur in this case, people need to move on.
  14. RedskinsInFebruary
    I don't know, maybe it's the ugliness? It hasn't rained enough recently in GB to rock that properly.
  15. RedskinsInFebruary
    Love the white-on-white. Shows all the mud, etc.!
  16. RedskinsInFebruary
    Did not like the white pants this past Sunday. Anything but the burgundy pants though. At least the white shows the mud, grass, blood, etc. :point2sky:D Our mustardy-throwback Gold is the best though! I used to have a book put out by the NFL in the early 70's that called the yellowy color "gold" (Skins, Steelers, Rams of the day, Packers etc.) and the Saints-type color "old gold."
  17. RedskinsInFebruary
    What? No broadcast in Hampton Roads this evening???
  18. RedskinsInFebruary
    I like the white-on-whites. They look bigger and have a more psychological presence on the field. Plus they show dirt and mud better. And it's worth it just to keep the Cowboys out of their classic whites.
  19. RedskinsInFebruary
    Gimme the all-whites with a muddy field. White is the first to show dirt, mud, the game. the only thing missing is some kind of white helmet to top it off--maybe just a simple spear with no stripes! get some mud and grass stuck in it and hangin out during your first series and we're all set to kick some colorful, nifty designs-fancy-pants @55!
×
×
  • Create New...