Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About kwitt

  • Rank
    The Backup
  • Birthday 02/04/1971

Contact Methods

  • Website URL

Profile Information

  • Washington Football Team Fan Since
  • Favorite Washington Football Team Player
    Gary Clark
  • Location
    Haymarket, VA
  • Interests
    History, Madden, crosswords, HDTV
  • Occupation

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I hope we keep the (non) name. I don't want a replacement name. Will always be the Redskins (sorry if some are triggered) for most of us anyway. It is also a subtle middle finger to Florio, Kellerman and the other idiots.
  2. So I barely held on after the name change. Not sure I can remain with what may end up being an epic tease that Dan will be forced out. Guessing a lot of you out there is having similar feelings.
  3. I welcome any and all league punishment if it means Snyder is gone. Anyone involved in this coup should be "hailed" as heroes and should have statues erected in front of the new stadium. Yes Daniel Snyder is that bad.
  4. You don't get it. You are correct. Listen to first hour of Czabe yesterday. He speaks for me and countless other long time fans.
  5. Washington Football Club please. Every name offends someone. Plain burgundy and gold. I'd rather my team have no name than changed from Redskins to another name.
  6. Not sure this is a real possibility but it was discussed just now on Czabe show. Just be known as Washington Football Club and become the new Browns. Same jerseys stripped of name and logo. Makes a lot of sense. All of us fans who hate name change can still see what looks like our football team (for the most part) play on Sundays. We can still call them REDSKINS (oh the humanity) while everyone who is triggered can no longer come at us.
  7. OK so not only the name is bad but anything having to do with Native Americans is bad now too correct? Just trying to keep with what is OK in our fragile little world today. Just a matter of time for Chiefs, Braves, Indians, Blackhawks etal if I am following this logic correct?
  8. Buckskin is the soft, pliable, porous preserved hide of an animal – usually deer – tanned in the same way as deerskin clothing worn by Native Americans. Some leather sold as "buckskin" may now be sheepskin tanned with modern chromate tanning chemicals and dyed to resemble real buckskin. Buckskin is preserved with a dressing of lubricant, physically manipulated to make it soft and pliable, and usually smoked with woodsmoke. Smoking gives buckskin its typical dark honey color (GOLD), and is highly recommended. Smoking prevents the tanned hide from becoming stiff if it gets wet, and deters
  9. I see it more like the love of you life has died and you get remarried.
  10. Warriors is so unoriginal and generic. If we keep logo and colors I can live with it (I am many many others will still refer to them as the Redskins of course). I really don't care for Warriors if we do change logo and colors.
  11. Call them what you want. I have never, ever called the basketball team anything other than the "Bullets." Same situation here. I just hope somehow colors and logo remain. So ridiculous. So sad.
  12. If we focus on colors we can keep uniforms the same and make this less painful. Washington Burgolds?
  13. I am close to the point where if they don't keep team colors and logo then I am checking out. Having said that, if they do go with entirely new color scheme and logo I hope it is designed by the same people who came up with the new Rams gear. Will make my decision much easier!
  • Create New...