Just now, Bang said:

Holy ****, this former judge does realize 2024 is only a year and a half away, right? Kind of pointless to still be in the middle of the warning when the election happens.
Spit it out, man!

 

~Dang!

16 minutes ago, tshile said:

Mike Pence is a damn hero of our democracy. 
 

let that sink in. Holy **** 

And he talked to Dan Quayle for advice in the moment...Dan stinkin' Quayle lol...

This guy talking now...yeesh lol. He's like Flash from Zootopia...

Ann Coulter just going off on Trump and the "2000 Mules" movie lol...she's still a gigantic douche, make no mistake. But I do enjoy it when someone other than liberals say this ****.

https://anncoulter.substack.com/p/dineshs-stupid-movie?s=r

Dinesh's Stupid Movie

Every time you think you have your arms fully around Trump's con, you realize it's unfathomably more cynical and far-reaching than you could have imagined.

Is there anyone in Trump World who isn't trying fleece to the Deplorables? Haven't they suffered enough?

Which brings me to Dinesh D'Souza's movie "2,000 Mules." The movie tells Trump diehards (a dwindling crowd) that their man probably DID win the 2020 election!

Using cellphone tracking data obtained by "True the Vote" (which sounds like a group named by Melania Trump -- "BE BEST!") D'Souza claims to have proof that 2,000 people delivered multiple ballots to election drop boxes in the five crucial battleground states that Trump lost.

There are two problems with this.

First, the movie doesn't show what it says it shows.

-- Cellphone tracking isn't precise enough to distinguish between liberal activists stuffing drop boxes, and store owners, police officers, delivery men and others who have perfectly legitimate reasons to be within a few yards of the same drop box every day.

-- In all five battleground states D'Souza considers, it is perfectly legal for third parties to drop off ballots for others, with varying degrees of lenience. Pennsylvania, for example, allows a grandparent, grandchild, uncle, aunt, niece, nephew, in-law, household member, caregiver or jailer to drop off someone else's ballot.

-- Even if every cellphone dot represented a left-wing organizer illegally dropping off another person's ballot, that still wouldn't make the ballot invalid. A legal ballot can be illegally delivered, although the guy who delivered it might be in trouble.

These flaws have already been well aired elsewhere.

The second problem -- my problem with the movie -- is the idea that Trump's 2020 loss cries out for an explanation. We know for a fact that Trump was wildly popular, sailing to a landslide election on the love of a grateful nation. Only something nefarious could explain his defeat!

Hello? Trump lost only one demographic in 2020 compared to 2016. What was that demographic? ...

Answer: WHITE MEN!

How did liberal activists pull off that?

In the five states where D'Souza deploys his hocus-pocus cellphone data -- Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin -- Trump lost 8% of white voters compared to 2016. He lost 12% of white men.

4 hours ago, Dan T. said:

 

This works, too lol...

4 minutes ago, LadySkinsFan said:

 

The one on the left certainly is. The one on the right has a very different profile. Plus the hair looks the same, it's streaked and she isn't streaking her hair now so it's all dark. Does Boebert being on a website trolling for sugar daddies so different than her husband showing his penis to underage females?

 

The one on the left certainly is. The one on the right has a very different profile. Plus the hair looks the same, it's streaked and she isn't streaking her hair now so it's all dark. Does Boebert being on a website trolling for sugar daddies so different than her husband showing his penis to underage females? They're both pretty raunchy people. 

 

The one on the left certainly is. The one on the right has a very different profile. Plus the hair looks the same, it's streaked and she isn't streaking her hair now so it's all dark. Does Boebert being on a website trolling for sugar daddies so different than her husband showing his penis to underage females? They're both pretty raunchy people. 

 

The one on the left certainly is. The one on the right has a very different profile. Plus the hair looks the same, it's streaked and she isn't streaking her hair now so it's all dark. Does Boebert being on a website trolling for sugar daddies so different than her husband showing his penis to underage females? They're both pretty raunchy people. 

 

The one on the left certainly is. The one on the right has a very different profile. Plus the hair looks the same, it's streaked and she isn't streaking her hair now so it's all dark. Does Boebert being on a website trolling for sugar daddies so different than her husband showing his penis to underage females? They're both pretty raunchy people. 

Ok, ok. Jeebus lol...

6 hours ago, Fan since a Fetus said:

Just a reminder in case it is needed

 

I'm not sure the one on the right is Boebert...

1 hour ago, The Almighty Buzz said:

 

I would imagine you are going to need to prove he knew what they were there for.

Maybe the fact that he lied about even conducting a tour at least points towards him knowing it was something he needed to hide.

7 hours ago, Fan since a Fetus said:

 

There was a Mad Men episode involving "exercise" pants that vibrate as a way to make your body exercise while you go about your day. They had Peggy take them home and try them out to come up with a winning ad...she found another use for them lol.

NSFW lol...

31 minutes ago, Jabbyrwock said:

 

Even with the risk of syphilis...thats a burning ring of fire if ever I saw one...would still hit it before Marjorie Taylor Greene.

Sorry, but I'd much rather hit Marjorie Taylor Greene...

I'm pretty surprised that I'm not really seeing much in the form of angry push back on twitter from Trump supporters...Normally it shows up on my timeline without needing to do anything. Now I'm actively looking for it and not finding a whole lot other than "There's no cross-examination, this is a sham!"...Having nothing but Trump's inner circle giving their first-hand testimony so far pretty much leaves little for diehard Republicans to **** about.

14 minutes ago, PeterMP said:

https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/12/opinions/alex-jones-inforwars-former-staffer-owens/index.html

 

Opinion: I escaped Alex Jones’ world. This is what I learned

 

There are people that actually believe all of the nonsense including Hillary cut off a girls face and wore it.

 

And they want to elect more people like MTG.

4 hours ago, JCB said:

This is what we're faced with. We're way past ideology.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2022/06/12/election-suspicion-georgia-greene-trump/?itid=hp-more-top-stories

Can you fill us in for those (like me) who don't have a paid subscription?

53 minutes ago, zCommander said:

Well, it's true lol...

2 hours ago, Forever A Redskin said:

 

Lol. So when people claim antifa actors were responsible for violence on January 6th it's conspiracy.... But you're allowed to make the same bogus claims for the BLM riots... Rigghhhtt.

That's what happens when one claim has an abundance of proof to back it up, and the other claim has nothing but convoluted conspiracy theories to back it up. It genuinely appears you're incapable of telling the difference.

Grin...

31 minutes ago, spjunkies said:

 

 

2 hours ago, @DCGoldPants said:

Well. Depends on who looks like a fool from these back and forth sprints. If by the 2nd time when asked to address "X" and they don't. They won't. The whole point is to keep you going and make the thread a mess. 

If anyone is confused as to who looks like a fool on this thread, they need help.