Ax

Members
  • Content Count

    2,923
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Ax


  1. I've always believed the world missed a great opportunity, immediately after 9/11, to wipe out every known terrorist organization possible. 

    The KKK would have been on my list. Even today, I would have little issue with luring them to a remote location, under the guise of receiving free "whatever", and killing every goddamn one of them. But that's me. I'm not one for dancing around the edges. to paraphrase Eula Goodnight, "A sharp knife cuts the fastest, and hurts the least."

     

    Of course, today, I'd have little issue treating Antifa, BLM, New Black Panther Party, or any other color/race specific hate group, with the same justice. No, they haven't been around as long. And no, they haven't committed all the types and numbers of crimes, yet. But, just as we'd all be better off had the KKK been wiped out in it's infancy, so would we be now, in stopping ANY such group of morons from gaining further support.

     

     


  2. 24 minutes ago, Llevron said:

     

    Why wait? 

    Well, mainly because as long as Trump keeps getting things done, the country has a punchers chance of being great again.

     

    If the R's, and I's, like myself, ever started using the liberal tactics of riots, violence, and destruction, it would happen sooner, rather than later.

    But we don't throw temper tantrums, burn our own cities/businesses, harass people at dinner, demand the opposition be silent, require safe spaces, and ask other people to pay our way in life. Somebody has to at least act grown up. That'll never happen on the left. And, like I said, it won't be our side, the R's and I's that do it anyway. It will be libs hanging libs.

     

    I just want to watch, for the entertainment of it all.

     

     

    EDIT: Sorry Jumbo, didn't see your post until after posting my last one.

     

    I will cease. 

    • Like 1

  3. 5 minutes ago, twa said:

     

    IDK Cruz was enough outside the mainstream to possibly pull it off.

     

    besides he coulda had his dad shoot her :kickcan:

    Eh, the MSM would have chewed him up and spit him out.

    If the loony left is successful in the midterms, and Trump is a 1 term deal, the R's are dead.

     

    If that happens, it will sadden me that I won't be around for when them D's turn on themselves, full time.

    The D's are about hate, fear, class warfare, racial divide, and destroying anyone, and anything in their path. If given complete control, their fate will be execution in the streets, by the very groups they create, and inspire. But, it might take 50-100yrs, so I'll miss the fun.

    7 minutes ago, RedskinsFan44 said:
    Add: Do you think Obama could have won if he had 5 children from 3 marriages and a history of womanizing?

    Against Hillary in the 2008 primary? Sure.

    But not if he was white.

    • Haha 2

  4. 13 hours ago, twa said:

    I for one believe Cruz woulda been POTUS.

    I don't think there was a single Republican out there that would have beat Hillary. The press has effectively cut the balls off of every R presidential candidate since Bush was re-elected. 

     

    Trump was the only one with a chance. It was a slim chance, but he pulled it off. 

    Thank Buddha.


  5. 2 minutes ago, CousinsCowgirl84 said:

    @Ax

     

    Obama ran several successful campaigns prior to his one as president, his success each time isn’t a racial thing. If people voted for him just because he was black he would have been a one term president. There is no affirmative action in politics.

     

    The reason barrack won’t the first time is he pioneered the use of social media, Donald Trump exploited it

    A very reasonable stance. I just don't agree with all of it.

     

    Yes, he had successful campaigns under his belt. But against who? I doubt it was anybody with the political war machine of the Clintons.

    I think it's pretty obvious his color, while not the only thing he had going for him, was the overriding factor in his beating her. And that without it, his other assets would not have been enough.

     

     


  6. http://thefederalist.com/2018/08/14/media-conspiracy-theories-devin-nunes-getting-control/

     

    Quote

     

    It is worth noting that Nunes’ and others’ work doing real congressional oversight has deeply embarassed the media. Without congressional oversight, the country would not know:

    • That Clinton and the DNC secretly funded Fusion GPS’s dossier.
    • That Trump affiliates were wiretapped during the campaign.
    • That a $50 million public relations operation is ongoing to feed Russia stories to the media and government even now.
    • That the FBI is working with this group running the PR operation.
    • That Bruce Ohr’s wife worked for Fusion GPS.
    • That top officials were leaking to CNN.
    • That the unverified dossier was used to justify FISA warrant applications.
    • That no official intelligence was used in Peter Strzok’s electronic communication launching the investigation.

    And much, much more. Yes, Nunes makes the media’s role in this story look just terrible. Still, their derangement toward him is getting ridiculous.

     

     

    • Haha 1

  7. 9 hours ago, RedskinsFan44 said:

    Oh FFS. Seriously? You really think he won because he was black and had an odd name?

    Never said a word about an odd name. But yes, I don't believe a white guy, with the same lack of any meaningful record, either politically, or privately, would have had any chance whatsoever of defeating the Clinton machine in the 2008 primary. No way, no how.

     

    Once Obama started gaining traction, the D's decided that having the 1st Black President, was bigger/better than having the 1st female president.

    (They were correct, too)

    So then, they bought Hillary off with a cabinet position she had no business ever getting. And the promise of their full support for her after Obama was out the door. As much as they hate her, the machine has too much dirt on the party for them to ever betray her.


  8. 1 minute ago, PleaseBlitz said:

     

    Well this is some impressive revisionist history. She won the popular vote by 4 million votes despite a foreign enemy interfering. 

     

    I rhink you also checked every box in the conservative victim card in that one post. :806:

    Considering how far in the tank the media was for her, yeah, it was an ass whoopin'.

    And without the guaranteed support from the Peoples Republic of California, the "popular vote" shriek is even more meaningless.

    • Like 1

  9. 6 minutes ago, PleaseBlitz said:

     

    Rosnstein said there was no allegation in the specific indictments he was referencing, which is a lot different than your assertion that Russia didn’t impact the election. Because the intel community and the Senate invesigation has asserted they did. 

     

    https://www.businessinsider.com/senate-intelligence-committee-report-russia-election-interference-2018-7

     

     

    With all due respect, that's all meaningless drivel. Russian disinformation is no different than the disinformation spewed by both political party's.

    no one needed the Russians to tell them that Hillary was terrible candidate. Loathed by her own party, though they were obligated to support her after buying her off in 2008. And, as equally despicable as Trump. She got her ass kicked by a completely unqualified Obama in 2008, (because of his race). So, getting her ass kicked again in 2016 is no surprise, at all. Except to the media who did everything in their power to get her elected.

    Of all the people I know who voted for Trump, not one of them was accompanied to the polls by a Russian.

    It's one of the wildest comedies ever pushed by the left. 

    • Like 1

  10. 3 minutes ago, Switchgear said:

    You've gone from "There was no interference" to "No votes were changed" really quickly. Without ever admitting how wrong you were in the first place.

    There was no interference (that mattered) because no votes were changed. And yes, I can turn off the light and get in bed before the room gets dark. Fast!

     

    But you keep playing message board shenanigans. Because independent thinking, common sense, and realism doesn't seem to be your forte.

    • Like 1

  11. 14 minutes ago, SkinsHokieFan said:

    I would love 1 “defense” of the Trump administration without the words Obama, Hillary, Clinton, deep state, Comey and whatever other state run boogie man is out there. 

    Well, of course you would. You must be choosing to believe every "boogeyman" thrown at Trump, while wishing to silence any challenge to them.

     

    That's a pure lefty tactic. They want everyone, and anyone who doesn't worship at their altar, to be silenced, drawn, and quartered.

    Luckily, there are two sides to a coin.

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1

  12.  

    9 minutes ago, Sacks 'n' Stuff said:

    The CIA, the entirety of the U.S. Intelligence Community, and even the Republican controlled senate all agree that Russia actively worked to assist Trump in the election. You sound like a dumbass.

    And not a one of them said it influenced any election result. In fact, to date, they've said it had no effect.

     

    Your opinion of me, and 25 cents, will by you a nickel, and two dimes.


  13. 10 minutes ago, StillUnknown said:

     

    Its not a presidency, its a cult and he is their unimpeachable leader.

    You mean like the cult that followed the guy who was going to lower the sea levels, and had school children indoctrinated, er um, singing, songs written about him?

    They have stood by despite the fact that he has admitted to sexually assaulting women, he openly supported a child molester for Senate, and has locked children in cages. 

    Sexually assaulted women? You talking about the rapist, Slick Willie?

    Obama would never tolerate support from a pervert, huh?

    https://www.cnn.com/2014/11/23/politics/terry-bean-sex-abuse-charges/index.html

    Locked kids in cages, just like Obama.

    https://www.businessinsider.com/photos-migrant-children-policy-under-trump-obama-2018-6

     

    These are just the clearly obvious "supporting you makes us ****ty human beings" decisions. Its says nothing of the daily forms of corruption, treasonous activities, and policies that hurt the very people who show him blind adoration.

    So, at least you seem to admit both sides do it.

     

    To those on that side of the fence, the kool-aid is essential life water at this point. When they follow his final instruction to jump of the bridge, those who remain will be better for it.

    To those on the other side of the fence, I would simply tell them that reality, is for those of us who can't handle drugs. And, we're tickled pink that they continue to show their true self, everyday, in every comical way.

     


  14. 10 minutes ago, Sacks 'n' Stuff said:

    You realize that these two sentences contradict each other, right?

    No, they don't. Except in the land of Unicorns.

     

    The only collusion during the election was Hillary and the DNC paying foreign Russian agents for Fairy Dust to throw on Trump.

    And the concerted effort to destroy Crazy Bernie.

     

    For the record, when I voted, there was no Russian present.

    • Like 1
    • Haha 3

  15. 8 minutes ago, The Evil Genius said:

    I don't see it Ax. All conventional thought (and recent results) show a massive blue wave is coming in November.

     

    When it comes..who do you think the party will blame? 

    To the first part, EG, nobody saw Trump winning the primary. Then, right up until election night, there were still plenty of "experts" predicting a Hillary landslide.

    (BTW, For those of us dreading that thought, re-watching videos of the MSM meltdown on election night is almost as good as porn)

     

    I also remember in 2004, the narrative was that the D's were fired up to get revenge for the absurd notion that Bush stole the previous election. That didn't work out too well for them then, either.

     

    So then, only a fool would believe there's "no chance" of a blue wave. On the other hand, it would be equally foolish to dismiss the possibility of a red wave.

     

    If there is a blue wave, Trump will definitely be given the blame. Establishment R's are just a hair shy of the D's, when it comes to TDS.

    • Like 1

  16. 6 hours ago, Llevron said:

    Its says alot about this country that yall actually think that he easily wins again even though hes such a piece of **** human and the worst leader we have ever had in our long and storied history. It says alot. 

    Well, it also says a lot that since 2008, the D's have lost, what, over 1,000 seats nationwide (National/State/Local) And, as long as the left keeps hysterically shriekin', the 2018 midterms will go against the grain, gaining seats for the R's in both the Senate, and the House. That's not supposed to happen. But neither was Trump winning the primaries. Then, the Presidency. The left has cried wolf, too loud, and too long. They are the reason Trump was elected. If the keep it up, they will be the reason the midterms go in favor of the R's. And in that scenario, Trump is a lock for 2020. So, please, let the left keep being who they are. 

    5 hours ago, skinsfan_1215 said:

     

    Is that with or without the assistance of an adversarial foreign intelligence service? 

     

     

    Without. Just like last time.

    • Like 1

  17. On ‎8‎/‎13‎/‎2018 at 2:33 PM, AsburySkinsFan said:

    Oh you wacky Republicans and your moral superiority!

     

    Yeah, looks like the only thing worse than being an R, is being a priest.

    http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/08/14/hundreds-priests-sexually-abused-more-than-thousand-children-pennsylvania-attorney-general-says.html

    Quote

    Several hundred Roman Catholic priests in Pennsylvania were accused of sexually abusing more than a thousand children, a grand jury report on Tuesday said, in an alleged “cover-up” described as “sophisticated” by the state’s attorney general.

    Probably safe to say this involves R's, D's, I's, current, and former priests.

     

    Would be beyond ignorant to think it's confined to one party.


  18. There are so many erroneous reports about Trump supporters, that later turned out false. This was just another.

    There's plenty of real stuff. There's no need to make up more. But, that's the lefty way. Destroy anyone, and anything that doesn't bow to their ideology.

    This thread only proves that. Somebody has the nerve to disagree, so the mob jumps into action.

     

    Reminds me of a bunch of Chihuahua's, barking at the big dogs walking by, from the protection of  their fenced yard. Then grouping up and sniffin' each others butts in congratulations because they sure "showed him."

     

    Sorry to have invaded your safe spaces.

    Please, continue the circle jerk.

     

    Uncle Ax, signing off. Under his own terms.

     

     

    • Like 1
    • Confused 2

  19. 2 minutes ago, Springfield said:

     

    https://www.google.com/search?q=capital+gazette+shooter+wore+maga+hat&prmd=nsiv&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi7nJ6gsszcAhVnoFkKHRkQBAkQ_AUIDigA&biw=414&bih=622&dpr=3

     

    Here you go.  Looks like the ONE guy who did it won’t be reporting news again.

     

    One person.  Christ the conspiracy over here!

     

    Youre just talking out your ****ing ass.  Have a nice day.

    Whatever. I also heard the local radio reports claiming there was unverified reports about the maga hat. The media was praying it was true.