Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/25/2019 in all areas

  1. 3 points
  2. 3 points
  3. 2 points
    Just finished watching this breakdown. This might be the best one I've seen so far. Love how willing he is to show Haskins' negative plays, while still giving him a lot of praise for his good ones. Something new I learned from this video was how much Haskins needs to improve on identifying and reacting to corner blitzes. I never really noticed that before when I watched him play, nor have I seen it mentioned anywhere else. Luckily, this is something that can be improved with experience. The guy who made the breakdown is a huge Redskins fan by the way, but this video was made long before the draft.
  4. 2 points
    Owners of replica of Noah’s Ark sue insurers for rain damage: https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.courier-journal.com/amp/1220627001
  5. 2 points
    Agree 100% with the underlined, bolded and text in "red"
  6. 1 point
    The corner blitz v Purdue is a miscommunication at the line, the read is Campbell but they needed an automatic that had PC stay at the kind for a quick toss, that was likely a broken play DH stuck with, but he saw it & that’s where you go with it. How well the Buckeyes RBs block is unbelievable. You notice OSU rarely protects with fewer than 6, and often 7. We need to do the same. Haskins has a long way to go & he can’t get there without time to set himself & read what’s in front of him... that’s difficult already, particularly with only 14 starts on the youngsters resume. I love that video httr, though I disagree with most of what the gentleman says, it opens great discussion.... few things better than breaking down plays, particularly from the perspective of the QB. On the flat footed out DH hit v PSU, it showed a ton of talent, but his read on that is the RB. Little things, but his talent won’t get that ball there in the NFL. OSU runs complicated assignments & reads with ty their backs, they have a lot of responsibility, especially compared to nearly any other college.
  7. 1 point
    Soto was on his fastball that whole AB. He's really locked in this past week. Looking like his rookie year. Hey look. It's almost as if Doolittle has been overused and his stuff isn't as good as it should be. Weird.
  8. 1 point
    Land was the original promise so land should be part of the deal. First for the funding of this project, begin by selling off central park and other urban park spaces. They have the greatest land value of publicly owned land that is currently unoccupied. As urban voters are, no doubt, the ones who most strongly support reparations, I'm sure they won't object. I would also be in favor of using all or some of the revenue generated by those awful express toll lanes, made to exclude the poor. This is really the only way of redeeming these horrible things. Now that we've found some money, it's time to start handing out land. 40 acres isn't going to happen with the current population size, but that doesn't mean there isn't land available. Much of middle America is empty space. Use the money raised via the previously mentioned plan, to purchase land in sparsely populated sections of the US where the dollar goes the furthest. Alaska, Wyoming, Montana, the Dakotas, New Mexico, Idaho, and Nebraska have the lowest population densities. Start buying that land, I'm sure current residents will appreciate the bump in land value and small towns definitely need an influx of new people and economic activity. You're welcome America.
  9. 1 point
  10. 1 point
  11. 1 point
    He ruined one of the things I used to care about most. I am totally apathetic at this point thanks to his managerial and sexual impotence. **** you Dan!!
  12. 1 point
    At this point you are either trolling me or blind or both. But I'll play along, **** it. I first said this: Which clearly is pointing out multiple examples of things that we preferred our child (when she was a lot younger) not be exposed to that would commonly occur in the TV shows that we watched. It was an obvious general statement citing examples that did not have anything to do with the cartoon itself. You then replied this: Which took a general statement I made (one that was not specific to the cartoon itself) and inserted it into your response about the specific cartoon anyhow to fit your agenda. The above reply I made was not even related to the cartoon, yet you ignored that even though it was obvious. To clarify, I responded with this: Which clearly stated that I was providing examples of other topics that would sometimes pop up in the TV shows my wife and I watched that we felt inappropriate for her to watch back then. While also explaining that I never equated same sex marriage to violence, etc. and providing the example of not wanting her to see straight couples making out either (edit: I can see why this part of my statement was interpreted to be included in the cartoon. I did accidentally toss it at the end of my statement and did not clarify - my bad for that). Again, it was obvious that I was speaking to the context of the TV shows my wife and I watch and not the cartoon. Then you again ignore what I said and reply with this: Refusing to acknowledge (even though it was clearly spelled out for you multiple times) that I wasn't talking about the ****ing cartoon. And refusing to acknowledge that I was talking in general about what we didn't want my daughter seeing in the TV shows we watched. And I also stated that we never had to address this topic with our daughter when she was a lot younger as this specific scenario was not presented to us back then (in the cartoons/shows she watched) and that it occurred naturally when she happen to come across it while we were watching a show and she saw two people kiss that were the same sex ( she was age 8 or so). In which we addressed it and educated her and explained that it was normal and perfectly fine for two people, even if they are the same sex, to love each other and be together and get married. So, please, stop twisting my words, using my comments out of context and making false accusations that I'm homophobic when that clearly isn't the case.
  13. 1 point
    I've been so busy at work and with my new baby boy that I haven't posted anything about the finale yet. Just about everything has been covered already. To add my general $.02, I had no problem with the plot points at all for the entire season, except I wouldn't have wasted 2 full episodes on the Night King. But I understand they had to do something to wrap up that plot line, so, whatever. That included the finale. What bothered me is that they rushed through the most important plot point in like 45 minutes of the approximately 78 hours of television they created: Danny losing it. And we don't even really know why, except she lost it. Which is unsatisfying. From the time in episode 5 where she goes crazy and burns the city to the time Jon drives a dagger through her heart is about 45 minutes of total TV time. They had 75 hours to set this up, and just didn't. And that part is somewhat maddening. I liked the finale fine. It was an entertaining hour and a half of television. It was extraordinarily well acted, and it was beautifully shot. My hat goes off to Emelia Clarke and Peter Dinklage who I think did tremendous jobs throughout the episode. For Emelia, at least until she was stabbed through the heart. I loved the opening montage of Tyrian, Jon and Davos walking through the devastation. I thought the whole Danny Speech scene was outstanding. It was almost right out of the WWII era Nazi/USSR films, with the big banners, stoic troops, leader making a grand speech. It was extremely well done. I enjoyed the chats between Tyrian and Jon, Jon and Arya, and even the last scene between Jon and Danny. The first 40 minutes and the last Stark goodbye montage were outstanding. However. There are just so many unforced errors due to "lazy" writing. I actually don't like the term "lazy" but I don't know what a better term is. I rally do believe that the writers and show runners worked very hard at this, I just don't think they did a good job connecting the dots on things which they should have been able to connect the dots on. So here's my list of things that made no sense in universe that they could have explained better if they had just taken the extra few episodes HBO was willing to pay for: - How the hell did Greg Worm go from murdering Lanister soldiers to up the steps waiting for the queen before Jon got there? Did he apperate (Harry Potter?) Transport (Star Trek)? Get running lessons from Gendry? This made no sense. It looked like Jon walked straight from their first meeting to see Danny, and Grey Worm was already there, and looked like he had been there a while. Jon really should have bent the knee to Grey at that moment, or at least asked how the hell he got there so quick. It was jarring, and took me out of the moment. - When Jon goes to talk to Tyrian, he has to be disarmed. When he goes to talk to Danny, he is allowed to be armed. Danny is all alone in the throne room, and Tyrian has like 30 unsullied guards around him. Which is AFTER Danny walked away being escorted by about 10 unsullied. I get they needed Danny to be alone for the vision callback and the Jon killing her, but that was just not really believable. She would have had some guards around her. She's had guards around her every moment we had seen her in the episode up until that point. - How in God's name does anybody find out Jon killed Danny? Nobody sees it. Drogon takes her body away. Nobody's there. Jon walks down the stairs, tells the unsullied who might be lurking somewhere Danny wasn't there, and just walks out of the castle. Unless he told somebody, thee are no witnesses except a dragon which flew away. And I don't think Jon is quite stupid enough to TELL Grey Worm that he killed Danny. Maybe he is. I dunno. And if Jon does tell GW he killed Danny, GW kills him on the spot. Or at least tries to. Jon would die eventually because even if he could best GW, the rest of the magically multiplying unsullied would kill him, most likely. (As an aside, I would have LOVED to see a GW vs. Jon 1:1 fight. Regardless, it would have been nice to SEE how Jon gets captured and made prisoner, because that just seems horribly unlikely. None of this makes any sense. Like no sense. There are a million ways to tell this story by just writing it a bit better. - What happens during the 3 seconds of black screen and 4 inches of Tyrian's beard? How did all the characters get to Kings Landing? Why did they come? Who invited them? What was the purpose of the meeting? How are the Unsullied holding the city? Is there really anybody even left in the city to hold? Where did the Dothraki go? None of this makes sense. Literally, that 3 seconds of black screen and 4 inches of beard growth could have been an entire 48-52 minute episode. And could have been extremely compelling. Imagine a scene with Yara finding out Danny burned down Kings Landing. Sansa finding out Jon had been imprisoned by the unsullied for killing Danny. As a side note, I think if Arya wanted to break Jon out, I actually think she could have pulled that off. Which would have been a cool faceless man type of thing. There was a lot of story to tell there, and I wish we were able to spend that time with the characters. - Now we move to the dragon pit meeting. First, the people who attended (From left to right) Sam - representing house Tarley, which doesn't really exist anymore? Or the Maesters, but he's not wearing robes? This is weird. He's there because he's a named character. Unknown Dude. Edmure Tully. Who has been absent since season 6, and captive since season 3 I think? The best part of the entire sequence is Sansa owning him. Arya - faceless man assassin, youngest daughter of the Starks and resident bad ass. But no real political power Bran - This makes sense in that he's the eldest son and theoretically Lord of Winterfell, though he renounced it to Sansa so maybe it doesn't make sense? Sansa - Lady of Winterfell, this does make sense. Ser Brienne of Tarth - if she's there as a body guard to Sansa (and Arya, though there's no need for that) then it makes sense. If she has a vote, this makes no sense. Ser Davos - As an adviser, this makes sense. Gendry - if he's here to take another swing at Arya, great. Otherwise, he was made Lord by a usurper who burned down King's Landing. That's a tough beat for my guy. 2 more Random Dudes Yara - I guess this makes sense. The newly frocked and formerly mentioned Prince of Dorne (The PoD). Which kindof makes sense except that he says nothing. I'll get to that later. Robin Aryn - Lord of the Vale. Who has grown up a bunch since we previously saw him. Lord Royce - If Robin is here, Royce would not be. Another Random dude First of all, this collection of people as the most powerful people in Westeros is a joke. Second, how the hell does Tyrian, who is in shackles, end up running the meeting? Third, Grey Worm just goes along with the plan? After keeping Jon and Tyrian locked up for at least 4 inches of beard growth, the official time measuring stick of the season? Fourth, I don't get what Sansa is playing at. Her brother, the oldest son of Ned Stark, was just made King of the Seven Kingdoms. Bran is a Northern Lord. He is a Stark. Yet the Starks won't "Bend the knee" to the legitimate Lord of Winterfell? That makes absolutely no sense. The North would not so much be "bending the knee" to a southern ruler, as ruling the whole seven kingdoms. The reason is that they want Sansa as Queen of the North to finish her arc. And as a Sansa fan, I get that. But the setup makes no freaking sense. Fifth, as soon as Sansa secedes the union, my expectation would be the PoD to stand up and say, "Unbowed, Unbent, Unborken MFers, we're out of here." And then Yara to say, "We pledged to Queen Danny, who was unjustly murdered, we're out homies." I guess Sam and Edmure would go along with it. I have no idea what the Vale would do, but they have been very tight with Sansa, so they might go that route. Sixth, Bran does not have a better story than anybody. Which is why he was written off the show for an entire season. Arya might have the best story. Maybe even Sansa. Or Tyran. Or Jon. It just made no bleeding sense. The whole thing was really a tough look for my guys the Double D's who wrote and directed this. Really tough. - Bran is King of the Six Kingdoms. Sansa is Queen of the North. What in the name of everything Stark is stopping either one of them from setting Jon free of his bonds to the Night's Watch the moment Grey Worm sets sail for Naath? The answer: Nothing. Except that they wanted to get Jon back to Tormund and the North. Which might be where he wants to be anyway. But the whole setup made no sense. - Brienne being the head of the Kings Guard makes no sense. She pledged to protect Sansa and Arya. There's almost no chance that she doesn't go back to Winterfell with Sansa to be the head of her Queen's Guard. I like the Brienne writing in the book scene, but I just don't think it's realistic that Brienne stays in Kings Landing when Sansa heads north.
  14. 1 point
    I'm strapped in and ready to go. It's been too quiet around here, LETS GET SOME DRAMA GOING!
  15. 1 point
    Season 2 of Spike Lee's She's Gotta have It dropped on Netflix today. :edit: 5 episodes in, S2 is even more "Spike Lee" than S1.
  16. 1 point
    If it has, you wouldn’t know about that it via public outrage. The point isn’t whether this particular kids show has touched on the subject of marriage, the point is it’s not something kids are typically sheltered from. Only gay marriage gets tied in with exposure kids aren’t ready for.
  17. 1 point
    "Those that know how to succeed know how to NOT make the same mistake over and over again, Dan Snyder said. That's how you succeed, and that's something I've done all my life." Feb. 25, 2001 Boy wonder uttered these words in a Washington Post article during 2001. At the time he thought he was a genius when it came to running anything including a football team. He is eating humble pie right now. Skins fans have been too patient and keep spending money on tickets and on his web site. He will not sell the team because it remains a cash cow. He has gained a lot of nice toys too-- super yacht, airplane, etc.
  18. 1 point
  19. 1 point
    This. $675/hr, even adjusted for inflation, is not some crazy amount for a top-notch lawyer. And in the field of bankruptcy, Warren was considered as expert as they come.
  20. 1 point
    good for him. Alex Smith makes an appearance during the Redskins' third day of OTAs https://www.nbcsports.com/washington/redskins/photos-alex-smith-makes-appearance-during-redskins-third-day-otas
  21. 1 point
  22. 1 point
  23. 1 point
    I read the article. And I was sad. And then I think... ... Damn... Jay is by FAR the most successful coach under Snyder terror. And then I'm sad again. Hail.
  24. 1 point
    I find complaining that people recognize that this is now used as a white power symbol in 2019 very much like people that would complain that women want to have equal pay for equal work. Its like you are more annoyed that people are pointing it out, than you are that it exists in the first place. Like yea OK racism and stuff is bad but its super annoying that you have to continuously be on the look out for it and because of that I have to hear about it more than I would prefer. And you ruined one of my favorite hand signs. If you just stop talking about it then it wouldn't even be a "thing". Yea go **** yourself.
  25. 1 point
    So if Martin starts, does everyone realize that would mean all 5 OL were drafted by the skins, as well as our 3 interior DL and both of our edges? Wow.
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-04:00