visionary Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 (edited) 27 minutes ago, skinsmarydu said: yes, but the recusal comes up for vote, if I remember parliamentary procedure then a new chair would come to vote Meh. There are 4 more Rs on that committee than Ds. A video could come out of Nunes in a gimp suit being spanked by Trump while screaming "Thank you daddy for letting me do your bidding and giving you the intel you asked me for" and he still wouldn't get voted out. Edited March 29, 2017 by mistertim 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 4 minutes ago, mistertim said: Meh. There are 4 more Rs on that committee than Ds. A video could come out of Nunes in a gimp suit being spanked by Trump while screaming "Thank you daddy for letting me do you bidding and giving you the intel you asked me for" and he still wouldn't get voted out. What a word picture! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 These men are as far from Jesus as the Devil. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momma There Goes That Man Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 Give me a break lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LD0506 Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 This may go against the grain for some, but I don't want Nunes to recuse himself. I want him and Gowdy and all the rest stuck fast to that tarbaby. Let them lie and lie and deny the lies and whatever, in the end whatever actually happened will come out. It is a force of nature, an essential truth of the universe, the **** ALWAYS comes out, and when it does it will be even worse. Let these treasonous dogs all swing 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momma There Goes That Man Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 Nothing will come out. We will be suffering thru this inept **** show for 8 years Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 Make Gowdy chair. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 I love how (most of) the Rs are acting like Nunes has done nothing at all to warrant this scrutiny, as though he's just some innocent victim of politics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 7 minutes ago, mistertim said: I love how (most of) the Rs are acting like Nunes has done nothing at all to warrant this scrutiny, as though he's just some innocent victim of politics. He's innocent like the Clintons Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsHokieFan Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 3 minutes ago, twa said: He's innocent like the Clintons She lost, and neither are President 45 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 1 minute ago, SkinsHokieFan said: She lost, and neither are President 45 And innocent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsHokieFan Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 1 minute ago, twa said: And innocent Irrelevant My tax dollars are paying for Comrade Trump and his family now, even if they think I am just a customer at Trump U 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 (edited) Edited March 29, 2017 by visionary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 17 minutes ago, twa said: He's innocent like the Clintons Those damn Clintons. I'm surprised you would cast such dispersions on your boy like that. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 7 minutes ago, Sacks 'n' Stuff said: Those damn Clintons. I'm surprised you would cast such dispersions on your boy like that. Bring me his head!...I want Gowdy as chair Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 Not to split legal hairs, but that rule depends on the information being given to the committee, not a individual. but whatever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bang Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 Call the carpenters. ~Hang 'em 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Why am I Mr. Pink? Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 (edited) 11 hours ago, twa said: Not to split legal hairs, but that rule depends on the information being given to the committee, not a individual. but whatever. No where in that article linked above your post mentions anything about the rule depending on whether the information was given to the committee vs an individual. Please cite where you are getting this information from. If you ignore my request, Ill assume you just made that up and dont actually read any articles linked on here. edit - how could it be an "unauthorized disclosure of intelligence" if it is given to an Oversight Committee? I have to be missing something from your point of view ... bc it just doesnt make sense. I am starting to think you werent referring to the article above your post at this point ... if so I apologize. Edited March 29, 2017 by Why am I Mr. Pink? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRAVEONAWARPATH Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 29 minutes ago, Why am I Mr. Pink? said: No where in that article linked above your post mentions anything about the rule depending on whether the information was given to the committee vs an individual. Please cite where you are getting this information from. If you ignore my request, Ill assume you just made that up and dont actually read any articles linked on here. From the House Intel committee rules and how/who they bind. The information was not given to the committee, in fact Nunes has refused to do so. He seems a man of many hats You may assume at your own risk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 I think it needs to be a little more bloody. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now