• Blog Entries

    • By JimmiJo in ES Coverage
         0
      ES Coverage Cowboys vs Redskins
       
      10/21/18
       
      Cowboys versus Redskins - now that just sounds correct.
       
      Hello friends, JimmiJo here along with THE Spaceman Spiff. Space is already on the sidelines, yucking it up with the important people. Me? I'm thinking how grateful I am for the 3-car accident on the beltway...
       
      If you cannot get up for this game, there isn't enough viagra made on earth for you. After all; the Redskins are hosting their eternal rival, the Cowboys. Winner will be sitting on top of the division, with a truckload of bragging rights.
       
      What's not to like?
       
      Well, for starters, everybody and their mom is inactive. Chris Thompson Jamison Crowder, Paul Richardson, Quinton Dunbar; all inactive. What a time to have have your top two receivers out. The chatter here in the press box is Washington should do what they can to bring in receivers - to include making a trade with the Raiders for Amari Cooper.
       
      Then there's the question of which Redskins show up? They could come out and light Dallas up. Or, post an anemic effort to suffer another embarrassing lost. Neither would surprise me.
       
      One this is for sure, the distribution in fans is something like 55-45 Redskins. Already an embarrassment. Until you consider this team has done much to earn the lack of support.
       
      Still, you have offer the finger in the middle to those fans who sold their tickets to Dallas fans. What were you thinking?
       
      Back shortly...
       
      Inactives
       
      The Redskins declared the following players as inactive:
      o   No. 10 WR Paul Richardson Jr.
      o   No. 23 CB Quinton Dunbar
      o   No. 25 RB Chris Thompson
      o   No. 30 S Troy Apke
      o   No. 55 C Casey Dunn
      o   No. 74 T Geron Christian Sr.
      o   No. 80 WR Jamison Crowder
       
      The team held a touching tribute to my friend Rich Tandler, who passed this week.
       
      Follow along in-game on Twitter @Skinscast
       
      Half
       
      Did you hear the one about the team that got chance after chance but couldn't score more than a touchdown?
      That's right; they are tied at 7 at the half and completely anemic in the second half.
       
      "Against the run of play" is a term you hear in soccer all the time. It is applicable here. It means the better team is either tied or trailing.
       
      Whoever said football was fair?
       
      Washington needs to find a way to get hot in the second half. The Dallas Cowboys are infinitely beatable today.
Jumbo

Moose & Squirrel v Boris & Natasha: what's the deal with the rooskies and trumpland?

Recommended Posts

Well, hell, why not just give out witnesses names and addresses?

 

Why have a justice system at all?

 

~Bang

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Cooked Crack said:

Sure nothing will be leaked

Give them fake names and then arrest them the moment the names get leaked.  Playtime over.  Time for traitors to get arrested.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, DogofWar1 said:

This is an important nugget to go along with Senate Intel confirming Russians had power to delete voters:

 

This should be a much bigger story than it is.

 

I also fear we will never get anything officially on record because that would scare so many people.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

 

14 minutes ago, BenningRoadSkin said:

This should be a much bigger story than it is.

 

 

that should be a HUGE story. 

It should be in big bold type on every paper in the country.


"In a position to delete or alter votes" means they DID.

Unless our oh-so-bright GOP wants us to believe they wouldn't do it even though they spent enough time to put themselves in position.

 

~Bang

Edited by Bang
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Bang said:

 

that should be a HUGE story. 

It should be in big bold type on every paper in the country.


"In a position to delete or alter votes" means they DID.

Unless our oh-so-bright GOP wants us to believe they wouldn't do it even though they spent enough time to put themselves in position.

 

~Bang

IMO, its why so many Republicans are not running for re-election. Someone tapped them on the shoulder and said, "you going to jail so fall back."

Edited by BenningRoadSkin
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, BenningRoadSkin said:

IMO, its why so many Republicans are not running for re-election. Someone tapped them on the shoulder and said, "you going to jail so fall back."

 

I think it's more a case of them knowing that Trump (and them) have pulled the "self destruct lever" on the country, and they want to get out before the countdown timer gets to zero (and hope that they can establish an alibi).  

 

Or maybe it's just a case of them seeing just how much they'll have to debase themselves, to remain in power.  (But that would suppose that they had any integrity at all, and recent performance proves that theory untrue.)  

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, Bang said:

 

that should be a HUGE story. 

It should be in big bold type on every paper in the country.


"In a position to delete or alter votes" means they DID.

Unless our oh-so-bright GOP wants us to believe they wouldn't do it even though they spent enough time to put themselves in position.

 

~Bang

 

Didn't the previous administration assure us it did not happen?

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, twa said:

 

Didn't the previous administration assure us it did not happen?

 

Are you interested in whether or not our country is safe, or just making little tiny insignificant partisan jabs like this?

 

Not sure who this one is, but go get Nikita. He's got more fire.

 

~Bang

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

This article links to the House Dems site, with downloads of zip files containing lots of pdfs of the ads. Some are just the text of the ads, but they show data about the creator, the creation date, how much it cost, clicks on the ad, target audience etc. Kind of interesting. I think you probably need to be on a computer to download and look at them though. Some fairly big downloads.

 

This is the actual House Dems page with the download links: https://democrats-intelligence.house.gov/facebook-ads/social-media-advertisements.htm

 

Edited by SoulSkin
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Here in the news biz, we have received a lot of new directives and laws to open up transparency about political ad buyers. Most of what we do in Southern MD won't have much to do with it since mostly we cover smaller local races that do not rely on outside funding sources like PACs..., but the national congressional and senate races, we have to be very careful.

 

~Bang

Edited by Bang

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, twa said:

 

Didn't the previous administration assure us it did not happen?

 

They were going off the intel they had at the time.

 

See how that works?

 

Btw...I wonder why Nunes hasn't released those ads yet? Are we sure he is even awake?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

twa’s new found skepticism of political wrong doing is absolutely adorable. 

 

As he goes to sleep every night, quietly whispering “IRS, Lois Lerner, Fast and Furious, Benghazi. IRS, Lois Lerner, Fast and Furious, Benghazi. IRS, Lois Lerner, Fast and Furious, Benghazi. IRS, Lois Lerner, Fast and Furious, Benghazi... benghazi.... benghaziiii... bengh...”. 

 

:kickcan:

Edited by No Excuses

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, Bang said:

Are you interested in whether or not our country is safe, or just making little tiny insignificant partisan jabs like this?

 

You new around here?  

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, The Evil Genius said:

 

They were going off the intel they had at the time.

 

 

 

Do we have intel NOW that shows changes made?

 

In position to does not equal did, and it should be easily verifiable

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ryan didn’t want the job now he’s just not doing the job. These guys simply don’t give two ****s about this country.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.