Jumbo

Moose & Squirrel v Boris & Natasha: what's the deal with the rooskies and trumpland?

Recommended Posts

Rudy is nearly 20 removed from being a critical thinker. Adding him is likely to hurt his employer here. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, visionary said:

 

 

 

. . . so that his staff can back the tape up and do it over, every time Trump goes away from his pre-written statements.  \

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

That’s the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard heard in the last 30 minutes. We use an online portal to conduct job interview preliminary questions to screen potential applicants before bringing them in for a full interview. They are video recorded answering questions and we had the option to let them redo question a set number of times before submitting it to us once they were happy with it or they exceeded the redo attempts. 

 

We immediately chose that they get one take only, because duh. 

Edited by Momma There Goes That Man
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Giuliani does know how to play the media game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, twa said:

Giuliani does know how to play the media game.

He's on Fox. He doesn't know what the **** he is doing period. You know Trump is watching that. Rudy may be gone soon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, RedskinsFan44 said:

He's on Fox. He doesn't know what the **** he is doing period. You know Trump is watching that. Rudy may be gone soon.

 

So he is on the most watched news?.....and your point?

 

Rudy knows how to play to crowds.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, twa said:

 

So he is on the most watched news?.....and your point?

 

Rudy knows how to play to crowds.

Means he ****ed up on friendly turf. Inexcusable (unless you're Trump).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, LadySkinsFan said:

Guess who's trying to sabotage the interview? 

 

You only get one guess.

 

Obviously Hillary, because the truth about her and obstructionist dem collusion with Russia will come out when Trump is proven innocent, and there's no collusion there with Trump (AKA: nobody as hard on Russia), and it's a total (sick!) witch hunt, and many people are now saying Trump deserves the Nobel peace prize. 

 

No collusion. 

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, RedskinsFan44 said:

Means he ****ed up on friendly turf. Inexcusable (unless you're Trump).

 

****ed up or Pied Piper?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Clinton was messing around trying to not do an interview as well then Star subpoenaed his ass and he cooperated. Mueller really should just subpoena Trump and not let him try to drag it out. Though I'm sure the Trump team will refuse and challenge it in court. Then if they lose and Trump is forced to testify 99% chance he takes the 5th.

Edited by mistertim

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, mistertim said:

Clinton was messing around trying to not do an interview as well then Star subpoenaed his ass and he cooperated. Mueller really should just subpoena Trump and not let him try to drag it out. Though I'm sure the Trump team will refuse and challenge it in court. 

 

He will likely go the Bill Clinton route of negotiated conditions....if it reaches that point.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/1998/07/30/us/testing-president-overview-clinton-agrees-testify-for-lewinsky-grand-jury-starr.html

Aug. 17. Mr. Starr was willing to agree to many of Mr. Clinton's conditions in exchange for the President's decision not to challenge the subpoena on constitutional grounds ....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
23 minutes ago, twa said:

 

and that really matters in the larger picture?

 

Congrats,,,,ya might have caught him being less than truthful or violating some campaign law. 

 

do you get a cookie w/dat? 

 

 

At some point people are going to say "gee, this guy is is a pathological liar. His press secretary is a pathological liar. And he has an incompetent lawyer." And when they do, when they start believing he is going down, they will quit supporting him. 

 

Add: "less than truthful". Hell, you're better than Rudy.

Edited by RedskinsFan44

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Going down assumes a lot at this point.

 

I'm fine with it, but I was fine with that from the start. :ols:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, visionary said:

Wow, no wonder these guys were able to rise to such high positions. That's some next level investigative work right there.

Edited by Sacks 'n' Stuff

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.