Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins
Forum Rules and Guidelines

The 2017 FA Thread - OP Updated with Signings (Sundberg, Galette, VD, Hood re-signed) *** Terrell McClain, Stacy McGee, DJ Swearinger, Terrelle Pryor, Chris Carter, Brian Quick, ZACH BROWN(!!)***

DC9

By DC9
in The Stadium

Recommended Posts

Est.1974

Est.1974

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, DM72 said:

I still think have a legitimate shot at Pryor.

 

I think he's waiting on the some kind of clarification on the Browns QB situation/plans.

5 minutes ago, Koolblue13 said:

What's the latest on Pryor? 

 

Nothing to See or Hear yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dont Taze Me Bro

Dont Taze Me Bro

Posted
Posted
Just now, DM72 said:

I still think have a legitimate shot at Pryor.

 

Same here.  He thought he was going to get top tier offerings and the Browns offer was a lot lower, I heard on NFL Network that it was around what they signed Britt for (8 million/yr).  Pryor thinks he can get more than that, but time is on our side, the longer he is on the market, the better chance we have to snag him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CTskin

CTskin

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, wilco_holland said:

I check profballtalk regular in this FA periode. Never have seen so many Redskins posts.

 

And we only signed three second tire FA''s!!!!.

Don't go on espn and click on the football tab... no bueno

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bobandweave

bobandweave

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, fordranger76 said:

Exactly. Plenty of talent in the draft for a high end pick. No need to sign a back on his last legs and waste cap space in the process on it especially when we have fresh legs on the roster already.

 

The reason you get a FA is to not use a draft pick. That's the point, FA net loss is only money. Has nothing to do with whats in the draft rather keeps the options open.

 

I guess narrowing in on just using a high pick on the RB position is the way you guys want to go with this. I don't and think thatt doesn't work this year. Why? Because our coach isn't about to commit to a bell cow RB in the first place, not his style of offense. Don't care if Walter Peyton was here, he's not going to give any of them 300 carries a season. So why use a draft pick on someone riding the bench? Of course we need another RB so we have to address that regardless and can't ignore it.

 

Option A - We can use the draft pick on a Defensive starter who will see the field and use FA to get another back. We address the RB with cash and Defense with pick. Gets two players who are starters with one draft pick

 

Option B - Or we get a RB with the draft and the defensive starter comes from nowhere. Cool story

 

This is just about using our resources correctly and given the choices of what is in FA and what is in the draft its the better way to manage it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...