goldenster95 Posted February 27, 2003 Share Posted February 27, 2003 Redskins | Cowsette Re-signs - posted at KFFL (http://nfl.kffl.com) 0:45 PT: The Washington Times reports the Washington Redskins have re-signed exclusive-rights free agent DL Del Cowsette to a one-year, $375,000 contract. Redskins | Ohalete Tendered - posted at KFFL (http://nfl.kffl.com) 0:44 PT: The Washington Times reports the Washington Redskins gave a one-year tender offer to exclusive-rights free agent DB Ifeanyi Ohalete. Redskins | Pierce Tendered - posted at KFFL (http://nfl.kffl.com) 0:42 PT: The Washington Times reports the Washington Redskins gave a one-year tender offer to exclusive-rights free agent LB Antonio Pierce. Redskins | Sulfsted Tendered - posted at KFFL (http://nfl.kffl.com) 0:41 PT: The Washington Times reports the Washington Redskins gave a one-year tender offer to exclusive-rights free agent OL Alex Sulfsted. Redskins | Brown Tendered - posted at KFFL (http://nfl.kffl.com) 0:41 PT: The Washington Times reports the Washington Redskins gave a one-year tender offer to exclusive-rights free agent OL Wilbert Brown. Redskins | Stephens Tendered - posted at KFFL (http://nfl.kffl.com) 0:40 PT: The Washington Times reports the Washington Redskins gave a one-year tender offer to exclusive-rights free agent TE Leonard Stephens. Redskins | Johnson Tendered - posted at KFFL (http://nfl.kffl.com) 0:40 PT: The Washington Times reports the Washington Redskins gave a one-year tender offer to exclusive-rights free agent FB Bryan Johnson. Redskins | Terrell Tendered - posted at KFFL (http://nfl.kffl.com) 0:39 PT: The Washington Times reports the Washington Redskins gave a one-year, $605,000 tender offer to restricted free agent S David Terrell. Redskins | Doering Not Tendered - posted at KFFL (http://nfl.kffl.com) 0:38 PT: The Washington Times reports the Washington Redskins did not give restricted free agent WR Chris Doering as tender offer and he is now an unrestricted free agent. Doering still could re-sign at the minimum, but he probably wouldn't be a factor as Washington remakes its receiving corps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dirk Diggler Posted February 27, 2003 Share Posted February 27, 2003 I wouldn't be surprised if Marty tried to sign Ohalete to an offer sheet. I believe they are in the market for a little safety help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SonnyJ Posted February 27, 2003 Share Posted February 27, 2003 Can other teams sign exclusive rights FAs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buddha Posted February 27, 2003 Share Posted February 27, 2003 No, just RFAs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RTerps2002 Posted February 27, 2003 Share Posted February 27, 2003 So Cowsette is staying and Powell is likely gone... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laurent Posted February 27, 2003 Share Posted February 27, 2003 Originally posted by RTerps2002 So Cowsette is staying and Powell is likely gone... What am I missing here? Didn't Powell already get signed to a new deal?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NavyDave Posted February 27, 2003 Share Posted February 27, 2003 How come we dont offer multi year deals for Ohalete, Sulfstead and Pierce now before they potentiallly blow up? This one yr stuff instead of identifying guys that can make a difference and signing them to very cap friendly deals now is silly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thito_da_skins_fan Posted February 27, 2003 Share Posted February 27, 2003 Originally posted by goldenster95 Redskins | Brown Tendered - posted at KFFL (http://nfl.kffl.com) 0:41 PT: The Washington Times reports the Washington Redskins gave a one-year tender offer to exclusive-rights free agent OL Wilbert Brown. :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NavyDave Posted February 27, 2003 Share Posted February 27, 2003 Don't get TCO started about the O line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posse81 Posted February 27, 2003 Share Posted February 27, 2003 Originally posted by laurent What am I missing here? Didn't Powell already get signed to a new deal?? laurent, It never got done. The WP is reporting today that talks are stalled over a clause regarding a jump in pay should Powell be a starter. He could easily leave now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BD Posted February 27, 2003 Share Posted February 27, 2003 Powell threw a little hissy fit about getting more money for being a starter, and now he's going to test the market... but the market and the draft is very deep at DT, so I don't know what he's thinking as a relatively untested guy. I think that now that Shade's gone, we need to replace Terrell. We'll probably have to do that in FA though, not the draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NavyDave Posted February 27, 2003 Share Posted February 27, 2003 Powell may be in for a shock because I didnt think he was all that and at his age, size and lack of productivity he is looking at being a backup on other teams. Powell and Gardener test the waters an in shape BDW who is willing to renegotiate, this could be a blessing in disguise since it should mean we draft a solid D linemen in the first round instead of flash. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaRock Posted February 27, 2003 Share Posted February 27, 2003 All good news except wilbert brown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zen-like Todd Posted February 27, 2003 Share Posted February 27, 2003 What did you expect me to say about the o-line? BTW, in case you didn't know, I was talking to this guy at the supermarket, and he said he was Wilbert Brown's cousin's girlfriend's doctor's mistress' husband, and that Wilbert has been working out really hard and expects to be the next Larry Allen. So don't worry guys, we're set at that spot. :puke: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RTerps2002 Posted February 27, 2003 Share Posted February 27, 2003 I don't understand why we didn't resign Ohaulante, Pierce and Susifield to long term deals either Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bulldog Posted February 27, 2003 Share Posted February 27, 2003 these signings might be minor snippets in the papers now, but I think in the long run that Ohalete and Pierce might end up being key performers for this team. Ohalete has very good physical skills and sems to have a knack for being around the ball. Pierce could be a starter at OLB with an injury to Armstead in 2003. And one would think that a good performance by Pierce as a spot player in 2003 could lead to the release of Armstead in 2004 when his cap numbers become less manageable at age 34. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NavyDave Posted February 27, 2003 Share Posted February 27, 2003 Which is why I dont understand why we dont sign them both to multiyear deals now ala philly so they arent that expensive and a great bargain when they come into their own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hauss Posted February 27, 2003 Share Posted February 27, 2003 I agree Navy Dave--a small signing bonus and you could probably lock them for 3 years--if they don't make it--what have we lost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skins26 Posted February 27, 2003 Share Posted February 27, 2003 My guess is we havent resigned them to multi year deals yet because they are just EFA's. So by signing them to one year deals we are still making them earn their money since none of them have COMPLETELY proven that they should get multi year deals yet except maybe Ohalete. This way it makes sure they arent complacent this year and that they werent just like one year flops. And if they do well again then they will just be RFA's which means we can still sign them to multi year deals next year withouth the risk of losing them to other teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skins26 Posted February 27, 2003 Share Posted February 27, 2003 Can these guys turn down the offer or does this mean they are basically signed to this?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Montilar Posted February 28, 2003 Share Posted February 28, 2003 They can turn down the offer. and then sit out the year and get the same offer next year. Next year when they are restricted free agents, the skins will decide what to offer them based on thier play. If they perform well, most likely they'd get the high end deal, meaning teams would have to give up a 1 and a 3 to sign them away. The middle deal would mean giving the skins a 1st, and the low end deal (minimum offer) would mean giving up a draft pick equal to where they were drafted. (Which in the case of Ohalete would be nothing as he wasn't drafted.) So there's no reason to bankroll them till next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skins26 Posted February 28, 2003 Share Posted February 28, 2003 Exactly Montilar thats what i was saying. We can just make sure they are the real thing and give them the big contracts next year. The RFA's we just offered minimum deals because well basically none of our RFA's are any good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.