brianforster Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/04/05/the-haynesworth-story-is-just-getting-started/ We only have a few more days to milk the Donovan McNabb trade aftermath, but PFT has come up with some exciting non-Draft programming for the next few weeks. We call it: Who wants Albert Haynesworth? One of the biggest signings in free agency was offered to the Eagles, and NFL Network's Jason La Canfora expects the Redskins to continue to try to deal him. The connection to the Eagles wasn't the only time PFT has heard a rumor of Haynesworth's availability this offseason. The financial implications of a possible Haynesworth trade are tricky. La Canfora writes the Eagles showed zero interest, so any financial stipulations didn't come up. Haynesworth reportedly isn't thrilled with the idea of playing nose tackle. We wonder how he'll react when he hears the Redskins tried to get rid of him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinnyfan57 Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 Good. ..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redskindan07 Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 We need people who fit the scheme and want to play here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsfan07 Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 He's the reason Orakpo made the pro bowl last year. I really hope we don't try and ship him outta here already. Dude is a monster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Godfather Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 Good...... Riddance. ..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
p0rtis26 Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 Cut him. I don't care the $ implications. There's no cap and $nyder is made of $. That would be the best outcome for the team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodriggo Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 Maybe it'll motivate him to be in shape for the season and not have to take every other play off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DGREENHULK Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 This is going to get UGLY fast Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RabidFan Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 Well he chose hear over TB and more money because he DID fit the scheme last year and brought some major improvement to our DL and team sack totals. Everyone bashes the guy but he's just being honest when asked the question of why he came here and would he have if knew we'd be a 3-4 team in his second year. He's getting the JC treatment of scheme/playbook changes each year here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinnyfan57 Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 He's the reason Orakpo made the pro bowl last year. I really hope we don't try and ship him outta here already. Dude is a monster. You know how tired I am of hearing this nonsense? Maybe you should explain that to Allen and Shanny. I guess they didn't realize how great your golden fatass is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SittingBull Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 20+ mill for not even a full season? What a waste if we were to get rid of him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
addicted Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 I thought some stupid website said that and this hadn't been confirmed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KevinthePRF Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 WhoTF is Greg Rosenthal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinnyfan57 Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 Everyone bashes the guy but he's just being honest when asked the question of why he came here and would he have if knew we'd be a 3-4 team in his second year. He's getting the JC treatment of scheme/playbook changes each year here. You know who else is.... EVERYONE ON THE TEAM!!! But Albert is the only one not buying into the program. He's the only one I have to hear post after post about how he doesn't like the scheme. Guess what, this isn't about what Albert likes or doesn't like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
p0rtis26 Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 Portis in the Maybach, Haynesworth on the yaught. Let's get rid of them both. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Always A Commander Never A Captain Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 He's the reason Orakpo made the pro bowl last year. I really hope we don't try and ship him outta here already. Dude is a monster. Very very true. Thank you. Cut him. I don't care the $ implications. There's no cap and $nyder is made of $. That would be the best outcome for the team. That's retarded. Cut him? Are you kidding? You have no idea how good Haynesworth is then. We'd have a gaping hole on our Dline if we just cut him. Maybe it'll motivate him to be in shape for the season and not have to take every other play off. You don't know what you're talking about. You realize he played the highest snap % with us than he ever did with the Titans? And you realize that the snap % he played is higher than most DT's? I guess you didn't, otherwise you wouldn't have posted this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinnyfan57 Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 20+ mill for not even a full season? What a waste if we were to get rid of him. Danny's money. That's the price you pay for doing bad business. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oldskool Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 Still trying to figure out why this team is insistent on being a 3-4 team when it's better suited for 4-3... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Santana_Fan Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 Dumb move if we get rid of him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinnyfan57 Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 You don't know what you're talking about. You realize he played the highest snap % with us than he ever did with the Titans? And you realize that the snap % he played is higher than most DT's? I guess you didn't, otherwise you wouldn't have posted this. You realize that stat is based off of the games he played in right? It doesn't factor in the 4 games he sat out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Always A Commander Never A Captain Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 Oh and don't believe a word that PFT ever says about Haynesworth, they're the ones that editted what Haynesworth said when and to what questions, just to stir **** up and get pageviews. I'm referring to the interview he had after he missed some of the mini-camp. **** PFT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLongshot Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 Still trying to figure out why this team is insistent on being a 3-4 team when it's better suited for 4-3... I'm figuring the defense will be a hybrid of some sort. Even so, I don't see the fascination with it. As for big Al, I think this all will end up being nothing. The talk was probably for that deal only, probably to avoid giving up draft picks. I'm sure they talked other players as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Always A Commander Never A Captain Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 You realize that stat is based off of the games he played in right? It doesn't factor in the 4 games he sat out. Of course, why would it? It's a snap % of all the plays he could have been in on. Not every single play the defense ever had. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gortiz Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 you are either with us and shanny ... or you are not. seems big Al is not ... peace brotha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TD_washingtonredskins Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 Still trying to figure out why this team is insistent on being a 3-4 team when it's better suited for 4-3... I don't see the harm in varying the defenses you play. I'm sure if training camp rolls around and they don't have the horses for a 3-4, they'll play a 4-3. But what's the harm in trying to implement a 3-4? A very high percentage of the teams that run it have found success. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.