Dirk Diggler Posted March 27, 2007 Share Posted March 27, 2007 I guess Jamaal Anderson falling out of the first round in his last mock wasn't really an oversight. http://www.nfl.com/draft/story/10091269 6. **Washington: LaRon Landry, S, LSU -- Lots of rumors they will trade out of this spot if they can get their hands on Chicago linebacker Lance Briggs. If they stay in the No. 6 spot, they could take Landry. If Chicago winds up in this spot, it could be for a defensive tackle like Amobi Okoye to pair up with Tommie Harris. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diggs43 Posted March 27, 2007 Share Posted March 27, 2007 I knew they wanted a DT with that pick. With Tank's issues and all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mania Posted March 27, 2007 Share Posted March 27, 2007 How does Anderson not get draftedin the first round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinstzar Posted March 27, 2007 Share Posted March 27, 2007 I knew they wanted a DT with that pick. With Tank's issues and all. The Bears have no need for a D tackle that early. Tank Johnson is only 26 years old and they have Ian Scott who is basically the same person as Tank Jonnson. If Chicago gets into that spot they won't use it. They will wait to see who drops and they will move down and get more picks. That is what they do. They will move down and get a Pozluzny or Pat Willis type backer and an extra pick. An alternative could be to move up into Clevelands spot at 3 if Calvin Johnson is still there. They could give Cleveland the six and the 37 they have to get in that spot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McD5 Posted March 27, 2007 Share Posted March 27, 2007 Briggs and Anderson at 31 would be tempting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kramdizzle Posted March 27, 2007 Share Posted March 27, 2007 personally the more i read about Landry the more i like him over the D line. IF** our dline can stay healthy that can be more than servicable, notice how i didnt say good. plus this is not a GREAT year for Dlinemen read about how Landry puts people in position to make the plays ALA Clark with taylor. he doesnt bite on pump fakes and has great recovery speed. let me tell you something........I think i have a new man crush Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinsinparadise Posted March 27, 2007 Share Posted March 27, 2007 LOL, I spent 30 minutes arguing that Adams is more regarded than Anderson by draft types with someone on the board -- sorry forgot the name. Anyway now Anderson drops out of the first round, completely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tastes Like Chicken Posted March 27, 2007 Share Posted March 27, 2007 If Chicago lands the stud DT that we are in position to draft, I will go off like never before and my family and neighbors will think that I have Tourette's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siven Posted March 27, 2007 Share Posted March 27, 2007 ****, if we can get Briggs and Anderson at 31. it'd be the steal of the century, but, whats the point of getting Briggs, when you have Rocky, MW, Fletcher, Lemar. 4 good solid linebackers. Why not wait a year on Briggs, and then take him when he hits FA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oldskool Posted March 27, 2007 Share Posted March 27, 2007 Kirwin's logic at times amazes me and he proves it here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commander_N_Chief Posted March 27, 2007 Share Posted March 27, 2007 ****, if we can get Briggs and Anderson at 31. it'd be the steal of the century, but, whats the point of getting Briggs, when you have Rocky, MW, Fletcher, Lemar. 4 good solid linebackers. Why not wait a year on Briggs, and then take him when he hits FA. I've said it outside of these forums and now I'll say it here...with the way our FO so loves to take care of their players when paydays come around :doh: don't be shocked to see MW get shipped out of Washington after this season. I'd hate to see it happen, but it's not going to shock me if this isn't peace of mind when they let MW go to another team. Dear god I hope my thought isn't true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Veretax Posted March 27, 2007 Share Posted March 27, 2007 ****, if we can get Briggs and Anderson at 31. it'd be the steal of the century, but, whats the point of getting Briggs, when you have Rocky, MW, Fletcher, Lemar. 4 good solid linebackers. Why not wait a year on Briggs, and then take him when he hits FA. would it be a steal sure, but that 24 teams we'd be sweating through . I still don't think we need briggs as much as chicago or someone else wants our #6. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dana87 Posted March 27, 2007 Share Posted March 27, 2007 We should wait for the pot to get sweeter before we pull the trigger on this trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigredskin77 Posted March 27, 2007 Share Posted March 27, 2007 Just take Landry at #6 please. Forget D-end in the first. THose d-lineman are not worth the #6 pick. Take landry please. Get a D-end in the later rounds. Baraka Atkins would be a great pick in round 5 if available. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinzFan007 Posted March 27, 2007 Share Posted March 27, 2007 i just did my mock and ive got use taking landry too if we stay at 6 which i dont think we will. i dont think we will move to the bears spot either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wilbur58z Posted March 27, 2007 Share Posted March 27, 2007 Anybody remember when Taylor Jacobs was projected as a top 15 pick? Mocks had him going to us at #12 before we traded that pick for Coles. Dude fell to the 2nd round....of course, the 'Skins STILL ended up with the turd. What a sick joke that was.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Om Posted March 27, 2007 Share Posted March 27, 2007 You know it's a matter of time before the rumor expands to include not only Chicago's 1st rounder (#31), but their second (#63). Best start writing your reaction threads now or they'll get lost in the resulting mega-merge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F Landry Posted March 27, 2007 Share Posted March 27, 2007 Briggs and Anderson at 31 would be tempting. That is exactly what I was thinking. That would be...sick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
macnoke03 Posted March 27, 2007 Share Posted March 27, 2007 How does Anderson not get draftedin the first round. That's what I don't understand. Did something happen to make him drop from a projected top 10 pick to completely out of the first round? :whoknows: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLEED-B&G Posted March 27, 2007 Share Posted March 27, 2007 ****, if we can get Briggs and Anderson at 31. it'd be the steal of the century, but, whats the point of getting Briggs, when you have Rocky, MW, Fletcher, Lemar. 4 good solid linebackers. Why not wait a year on Briggs, and then take him when he hits FA. exactly we can still move down without getting Briggs and get two players at actual positions of need....who woulda thunk it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted March 27, 2007 Share Posted March 27, 2007 LOL, I spent 30 minutes arguing that Adams is more regarded than Anderson by draft types with someone on the board -- sorry forgot the name. Anyway now Anderson drops out of the first round, completely. Please show me one out of the hundreds of other mocks that don't have Anderson in the 1st round. You found one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted March 27, 2007 Share Posted March 27, 2007 That's what I don't understand. Did something happen to make him drop from a projected top 10 pick to completely out of the first round? :whoknows: Yeah it is pretty much a mystery there. Maybe some teams are talking trash about him so they can pick him up later? Dunno. But I promise you he won't be there at #31. I think (from what I've read on a few draft boards) that there is a saying or thinking going around that he won't be able to produce for a year or two at least, which is rather odd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cphil006 Posted March 27, 2007 Share Posted March 27, 2007 Trade down and still get Landry!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cphil006 Posted March 27, 2007 Share Posted March 27, 2007 If Chicago lands the stud DT that we are in position to draft, I will go off like never before and my family and neighbors will think that I have Tourette's. is that a good thing or a bad thing? what stud DT? Not Okoye or Branch... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted March 27, 2007 Share Posted March 27, 2007 LOL, I spent 30 minutes arguing that Adams is more regarded than Anderson by draft types with someone on the board -- sorry forgot the name. Anyway now Anderson drops out of the first round, completely. http://www.fftoolbox.com/nfl_draft/2007_mockdrafts.cfm There. A nice big database of different mocks. Lets see where Anderson is. Most have him in the top 10. None that I saw had him even in the bottom of the 1st, letalone not in the 1st. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.